Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A child hugs their parent as abortion rights activists gather for a demonstration.
Abortion rights activists march through the streets of downtown Detroit in May 2022. (Matthew Hatcher/SOPA Images/Getty Images)

Election 2022

Will an abortion petition be on the ballot in Michigan in November? It’s up to a court.

A ballot measure that would put a right to an abortion in the Michigan Constitution is in front of the state Supreme Court after a four-member board deadlocked on a challenge that described formatting and spacing errors. 

Barbara Rodriguez

State Politics and Voting Reporter

Barbara Rodriguez portrait

Published

2022-09-07 05:00
5:00
September 7, 2022
am

Updated

2022-09-07 14:28:20.000000
America/New_York

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

DETROIT — A ballot measure that would enshrine abortion rights into the Michigan Constitution has been thrown into limbo just weeks before it was set to be presented to voters, though its supporters say they’re hopeful a court ruling this week will get it on the ballot.

The Michigan Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on whether the ballot measure brought by the group Reproductive Freedom for All (RFFA) will make it to voters in the November midterm election. The group has filed an emergency complaint to the court asking for an expedited ruling.

The complaint came after the two Republicans on a four-person elections board known as the Michigan Board of State Canvassers voted last week to reject the ballot measure after opponents challenged it. Democrats on the board voted to advance the measure, resulting in a tie that blocked its certification.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Organizers for Reproductive Freedom for All — a coalition that includes Planned Parenthood Advocates of Michigan and the ACLU of Michigan — collected more than 750,000 signatures over several months in support of the ballot measure, far more than the roughly 425,000 needed. It’s one of several abortion-related ballot measures that citizens around the country have organized around in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June 24 ruling that overturned federal abortion rights.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The future of abortion rights is expected to increase voter turnout in November, according to political strategists and pollsters tracking voter sentiment. In August, voters in Kansas overwhelmingly rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have eliminated state abortion protections.

Abortion being handed back to states has brought attention to Michigan, where a 1931 abortion ban has not been in effect amid litigation. (On Wednesday, the Michigan Court of Claims struck down the nearly century-old law as unconstitutional.) Although Reproductive Freedom for All began collecting signatures before the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in June, some see the ballot measure as another way to ensure the 1931 abortion ban remains dormant. 

The ballot measure would guarantee the right to an abortion up until fetal viability, and restrict the state’s ability to regulate abortion after that point if the health of the pregnant person is in danger, as well as care related to a pregnancy, including birth control, according to the group. Citizens to Support MI Women and Children, a coalition of anti-abortion groups, opposes the scope of the ballot measure, saying it would overturn several abortion restrictions in the state.

  • More from The 19th
    An illustration of a pregnant person and a gavel coming down on top of them.
  • Local judges now have more power to decide who gets an abortion
  • Republican midterm candidates are trying to rewrite their history on abortion. Here’s what that means.
  • Key Equal Rights Amendment activists long avoided tying it to abortion. A group of teenagers is changing that.

Reproductive Freedom for All has argued to the court that rejecting the ballot measure would violate the rights of people who signed a petition in support of it. In its filing, the group says it’s losing “valuable time and resources” to educate the public about the proposal.

“I think it’s just another testament to how deranged our politics really has become, not only in Michigan, but all across the country, when essentially two people can thwart the will of nearly three quarters of a million citizens who signed on to a petition for a ballot proposal,” said Dr. Michael Hertz, an organizer for Reproductive Freedom for All and a retired OB-GYN who met with potential voters at an event in northern Michigan over the Labor Day weekend.

Citizens to Support MI Women and Children challenged the ballot measure in a legal filing that described some spacing and formatting errors in the text “as a hodgepodge of nonsensical gibberish.” The coalition estimates there are 60 errors that were not in a version of the ballot measure submitted earlier in the year.

“Constitutional amendments aren’t about big grand themes or big ideas … they’re really about very specific words that have been carefully chosen and have legal meaning,” said Christen Pollo, a spokesperson for the group. “And in this case, we’re looking at strings of 108 characters that don’t have any definition in the English language. The correct number of errors put in our constitution is zero, not 60.”

Reproductive Freedom for All says that spacing on the proposed amendment was inadvertently minimized but not eliminated and that a simple copy and paste of the electronic version of the petition would show that. The group also argues that the board exceeded its authority in rejecting the ballot measure.

The Michigan Supreme Court, which leans Democratic, has typically ruled in favor of ballot measures when enough petition signatures have been submitted. The anti-abortion coalition has not challenged the validity of the signatures. The court is set to take up the abortion rights ballot measure and another ballot measure that would expand voting rights in the state. Democrats and Republicans were also deadlocked on that vote. Most observers expect a ruling in both cases by Friday to give election offices time to print ballots.

Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, a Democrat who is running for reelection this year, expressed alarm at the board’s actions on both ballot measures.

“Technicalities should not undermine the voice of the voters and the will of the people from coming to fruition,” she told The 19th on Monday. “And yet when we see a hyper politicization of these canvassing boards at the state or local level, that’s essentially the danger: that they choose partisanship over the law and doing what’s right. My hope is that the law will prevail here.”

Benson drew parallels to a scenario in which an elections board blocks certification of an election. She said that in the hours after the board’s vote, there were rumors that the ballot measure was officially rejected. She said it’s important for the law to be communicated clearly to the public — in this instance, that there was a legal remedy through the state supreme court.

“Part of the strategy is to create confusion and sort of feed into this chaos, in this moment, and cause people to disengage and not pay attention, and not want to pay attention because it’s too noisy,” she said.

At a Labor Day picnic in Detroit, other elected officials and organizers expressed frustration that the state’s highest court had to even get involved.

“It would be a travesty to go against the will of the people,” said Debbie Rosenman, an activist in Bloomfield Hills in southeastern Michigan who volunteers for a group called Fems for Democracy and helped collect signatures. A rally in support of the ballot measure was scheduled Wednesday in Lansing.

U.S. Rep. Brenda Lawrence, a retiring Democrat representing Detroit and surrounding areas, called the rejection “insulting” to the hundreds of thousands of people who signed a petition to get the issue on the ballot.

“Hopefully the court will make the right decision,” she told The 19th. “You can have your personal opinion. But America is about a democracy. … I feel strongly that if we get it out there, based on the people who signed the petition, that we can win.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Sen. Daniel A. Ivey-Soto speaks during a legislative session at the New Mexico State Capitol

Politics

What makes state legislatures uniquely prone to alleged harassment

Alleged cases in New Mexico and beyond highlight the power dynamics and underlying bureaucratic structures that make legislatures a place ripe for abusive behavior.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram