Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

An illustration of a pregnant person and a gavel coming down on top of them.
(Getty Images)

Abortion

Local judges now have more power to decide who gets an abortion

The surge of new bans is expanding the significance of how judges rule on local abortion matters.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2022-08-31 11:33
11:33
August 31, 2022
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

As abortion bans with narrow restrictions go into effect across the country, local and state judges — who typically lack medical training and are predominantly White men — are playing an increasingly significant role in determining whether someone is able to access an abortion. 

Judges have long been influential in deciding whether minors are able to get abortions through a mechanism known as judicial bypass. In the majority of states, minors have for years only been able to get an abortion if they obtain parental consent first. Those who are unable to do so can petition a judge to override the requirement.

The judicial bypass system has been criticized by many physicians and abortion rights supporters, who note that getting a hearing can take weeks, affecting what options are available to petitioners. Decisions can be largely shaped by the personal and political inclinations of individual judges. State and local judges are selected separately from those who serve on the federal judiciary. In some states, judges are elected. In others, they are political appointees selected by the governor.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

In one case from this past January, a Florida judge denied a 17-year-old girl her judicial bypass in part because of her GPA. (An appeals court overturned that decision, and the judge recently lost a reelection campaign.) Earlier this month, a 16-year-old was denied because of questions about her “maturity.”

“The personality of the judge, and his training and his social economic status is all very important,” said Carol Sanger, a professor at Columbia School of Law who has studied the judicial bypass process.

The bevy of new abortion restrictions has expanded the impact the judicial bypass requirement can have. Roe’s overturn has allowed more states to enact abortion bans earlier in pregnancy. Three states — Georgia, South Carolina and Ohio — are now enforcing six-week abortion bans, and Florida is enforcing a 15-week ban.

  • More abortion coverage
    Greyed out map with text that reads
  • What abortion looks like in every state — right now
  • Republican midterm candidates are trying to rewrite their history on abortion. Here’s what that means.
  • ‘I would wish this on absolutely no one’: How three women dealt with pregnancy in the year since Texas’ six-week abortion ban

That means that the process of appealing a bypass ruling — which can take weeks in some cases — puts young people up against a truncated timeline, Sanger said. For instance, she noted, Florida’s truncated deadline could mean the process of appealing could simply take too long, so even if it successful, it could be too late. 

“All sorts of personal preference and beliefs contribute to how a judge decides these cases,” Sanger said. “The hearings now act as a kind of scolding, and they’re humiliating. You’re asked about, ‘Were you and your boyfriend using birth control?’ or ‘What‘s the matter with your parents that you can’t tell them?’”

In states that ban abortions after six weeks of pregnancy, the time required to get a judicial bypass often puts abortions out of reach. Most people do not realize they are pregnant until the fourth week of pregnancy at the absolute earliest.

Texas started to enforce a six-week cutoff for abortions last September. Once that law took effect, the vast majority of minors who could not obtain parental consent were unable to get an abortion in the state, said Irma Garcia, client services manager for Jane’s Due Process, which helps young people get abortions. And without the support of their parents, many were also unable to travel out of state for a procedure. 

“Any delay to reaching a decision on cases where the law is in effect has tremendous consequences for people accessing abortion,” said Brigitte Amiri, deputy director at the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project.

Beyond judicial bypass cases, many abortion bans across the country include thin, vaguely defined exceptions that allow for abortion to be provided if continuing a pregnancy would jeopardize the life, or sometimes the health, of the pregnant person.

Eleven states are now enforcing almost total abortion bans, in addition to the three with six-week bans. All of these bans have nominal exceptions if the abortion would save the pregnant person’s life — but the legislative language is often unclear, and likely to be tested in state court, another area where judges hold influence.

It’s also unclear to doctors and other abortion providers what constitutes this kind of medical emergency, and under what circumstances physicians or other abortion providers could be held liable for providing an abortion. 

“What if I break the law but save my patient?” a West Virginia physician recently told The 19th, as the state debated its own abortion ban, which has not been passed but was written similarly to many laws now being enforced. “And what if I don’t break the law and my patient dies? If I save my patient do I lose my medical license? And do I go to prison?” (The physician’s name is being withheld because abortion providers who work at his clinic have been threatened with violence.)

There is no medical term that determines something “an emergency.” And many physicians are worried that merely knowing that someone’s condition could worsen without an abortion may not be enough to qualify for an exception.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

For instance, patients experiencing ectopic pregnancies — a life-threatening situation in which a fertilized egg is stuck outside the uterus — require abortions, per an amicus brief filed by a group of medical organizations in a federal case challenging components of Idaho’s abortion ban. But waiting for a true “emergency” could mean delaying care until the patient is at severe risk of internal bleeding and requires emergency surgery, increasing the chance of death.

 How laws are enforced and interpreted — and which cases are considered truly life-threatening — will vary from county to county, legal experts noted. And they will be based in large part on how local prosecutors and judges enforce them. 

“The fact of the matter is these doctors don’t know what the judges are going to do with these laws once they get before them. They don’t know what Judge X or Y will say,” said Molly Meegan, chief legal officer and general counsel for the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 

That uncertainty can in some cases deter health care professionals from providing abortions they might, under their own interpretation of the law, feel legally secure doing. It is often harder to know in advance how a particular judge might lean, and judges are often assigned through a random process. In some states, the penalty for performing an illegal abortion can be lifetime imprisonment, or fines of up to $100,000. 

“No doctor wants to be dragged through court and a potentially expensive, reputation-damaging experience, even if the ultimate result is safe,” said Greer Donley, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh, who focuses on abortion policy. “This is where you have aggressive prosecutors capable, just by the threat, of chilling conduct — and aggressive judges, too.” 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Blake Masters listens to supporters during a campaign event.

Abortion

Republican midterm candidates are trying to rewrite their history on abortion. Here’s what that means.

At least three candidates have edited their campaign websites to remove references to strict abortion bans — a reflection of growing voter backlash to the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram