Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion rights advocates march to the Florida Capitol.
Abortion rights advocates march to the Florida Capitol to protest a bill to limit abortions in February 2022 in Tallahassee, Florida. (Mark Wallheiser/Getty Images)

Abortion

The 19th Explains: 15-week abortion bans may become law in three states. What does that mean?

Florida's legislature has passed one such ban, and similar bills are moving in two other states. They offer one roadmap for the future of abortion policy.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2022-02-22 11:06
11:06
February 22, 2022
am

Updated

2022-03-04 07:25:20.000000
America/New_York

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Three states are poised to pass laws banning abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy — a limit not currently allowed under Roe v. Wade but one that could soon become legal if the landmark Supreme Court case is weakened or overturned, which is likely to happen this summer.

Florida’s legislature passed a bill Thursday night that would ban abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy. Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to sign the legislation imminently, and it is set to take effect July 1. 

Bills are also moving in West Virginia and Arizona, where at least one legislative chamber has passed a bill instituting a 15-week ban. Both states have Republican majorities in their state legislatures, as well as Republican governors who have indicated they support abortion restrictions. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

None of these bans would have an immediate impact, in part because of how each state legislature works, and in part because of the likelihood that abortion rights supporters will file legal challenges, citing the bills’ violations of Roe v. Wade’s protections. But the bills indicate a path for states to curb abortion access while not altogether stopping it. Some people believe the Supreme Court is more likely to allow a 15-week abortion ban than a six-week ban, or a total prohibition of the procedure.

“From where we are today, where abortion is legal up until viability, 15 weeks is obviously dramatic in terms of the shortened amount of time,” said Laurie Sobel, associate director of women’s health policy at the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. “But because of the dialogue around Texas it suddenly seems, among people who don’t follow it closely, like, oh well, 15 weeks, that seems like a good compromise.’”

Will these laws take effect? What impact would they have? What do they say about the future of abortion access? The 19th explores the implications of these 15-week bans.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Do these laws violate Roe v. Wade? Does that matter? 

Currently, 15-week bans are considered unconstitutional because of the abortion rights guarantee established in Roe v. Wade. Per the 1973 ruling, which was reaffirmed in 1993, the Supreme Court held that the Constitution preserves the right to an abortion up until a fetus can live independently outside the womb, typically around 23 to 25 weeks.

But the Supreme Court is currently revisiting that decision in a case argued this past December. The case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, concerns a Mississippi law that would ban abortions after 15 weeks, well before the threshold established by Roe v. Wade. 

Mississippi’s law has not taken effect. But in its arguments before the court, Mississippi’s attorney general argued not only that the 15-week ban should stand but that justices should use this opportunity to reverse Roe v. Wade. That would allow states to ban abortion entirely. 

At the December oral arguments, a majority of the court’s justices indicated openness to weakening or eliminating the Roe protection. Legal observers expect the court to either effectively undo Roe v. Wade entirely or allow states to ban abortion from 15 weeks onward. 

No lawmaker or expert has put forth medical reasoning to explain the 15-week threshold. 

A decision in the case is expected in June or July.

When would these new 15-week bans take effect? 

In West Virginia, laws typically take effect 90 days after they have been signed — putting that state’s bill on track for enforcement by the end of May or early June depending on when exactly it’s passed and signed. Florida’s bill says its law would take effect July 1. And in Arizona, new laws generally take effect 90 days after the legislature adjourns, which means it would probably have a start date around August. 

But all that depends on when and how the Supreme Court has ruled on the Dobbs case. If the court has not yet opened the door to 15-week bans, these new state laws could be temporarily blocked or delayed.

Both West Virginia and Arizona also have total abortion bans, passed before 1973,  could take effect if Roe is completely overturned. (West Virginia’s dates back to 1848.) If those laws do in fact take effect, they could supersede these newer 15-week bans.   

Abortion rights advocates and anti-abortion protesters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court.
Abortion rights advocates and anti-abortion protesters demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court as the justices weigh whether to uphold a Mississippi law that bans abortion after 15 weeks and overrule the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision in December 2021. (Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images)

What kind of impact would these 15-week bans have? 

Republican supporters have sought to frame the 15-week ban as a moderate compromise compared with total abortion bans or laws like one in Texas, which prohibits the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it via civil lawsuits. Nationally, almost 93 percent of abortions occur before 13 weeks of pregnancy, per federal data collected in 2019. 

But abortions performed later than 15 weeks usually involve extenuating circumstances: serious health concerns that developed later in pregnancy, or cases in which a patient wasn’t able to collect the money and other support — time off from work or child care, for instance — to come any sooner. Minors who are unable to tell their parents, or who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest, are also more likely to face delays that could put them past the 15-week mark. 

“If you’ve never had a period before, or you’re not familiar with your period or you don’t understand the consequences or what can happen to your body from rape, intercourse or you don’t understand what those things are — you could be pregnant well past 15 weeks before being aware,” said Amber Gavin, vice president of advocacy and operations for A Woman’s Choice, an abortion clinic network that operates in Jacksonville, Florida. The clinic provides abortions just past 20 weeks. 

Are there exceptions to the bans?

None of the bans being discussed have exceptions for people who became pregnant as a result of rape or incest. 

The Florida bill says it would allow for abortions after 15 weeks only if two separate doctors could detect a “fatal fetal abnormality.” Arizona’s would allow an exception only if doctors believe giving birth would put the pregnant person at “serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function.” West Virginia says its ban does not apply if there is a “medical emergency or in the case of a severe fetal abnormality.”

In practice, though, it’s unclear if those exceptions would have much of an impact, Sobel said. Patients have to know those exceptions exist, and doctors run the risk of criminal penalty if someone second-guesses their definition of an emergency.

“If you’re facing a year in prison and losing your medical license based upon providing an abortion after 15 weeks because of a medical emergency?” Sobel said. “The chilling effect on providers could be real, especially if they start enforcing this and you see doctors facing criminal charges.” 

  • More abortion coverage from The 19th
    Nurses check women's vitals as they lay down before, or after their abortions.
  • Texas’ six-week abortion ban is still causing more than twice as many patients at clinics in nearby states
  • Experts say Biden could use executive powers to protect abortion access
  • Laws restricting abortion may also limit options for people who miscarry

How will these laws affect people who live in neighboring states? 

Florida, which currently allows abortion up to 24 weeks, has long been considered a potential refuge if Roe is overturned: Nearby states like Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia and Louisiana all have laws on the books that would ban most or all abortions if Roe is overturned, though none are currently enforced. 

“We’re already seeing patents from Georgia and different parts of the country coming from places where abortion is already restricted,” said Gavin in Jacksonville. “Folks in the southeast area are going to have to travel to North Carolina.”

West Virginia’s law has a similar potential for regional impact, said Katie Quinonez, executive director of the Women’s Health Center of West Virginia, the state’s sole abortion clinic, which currently provides abortions up until 17 weeks and 6 days. She worries about the loss of even three weeks in which people can get abortions.

In 2019, about 14 percent of abortions performed in West Virginia were for people who had traveled from out of state, according to data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Many of those patients come from Ohio and Kentucky, Quinonez said — states where legislators are now weighing their own new abortion restrictions, including a six-week ban in Ohio modeled after the one currently active in Texas. 

That could create a cascading effect, making it harder for people across the region to access care, Sobel said.

“It’s going to be very challenging for a lot of people,” she said. “I don’t want to say it’s a picnic right now. It’s not like people have been able to access abortion freely in those states right now. But it’s going to become more challenging.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

From the Collection

The 19th Explains

People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
  • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

    Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

    Kate Sosin · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

    Mariel Padilla · December 1

Up Next

A nurse holds a group picture taken with fellow nurses.

Business & Economy

Travel nurses saw an increase in pay during the pandemic. Now, they could lose those benefits

Travel nurses, who are in high demand and earning as much as twice their pre-pandemic wages, are in an uproar after legislators call for an investigation that could lead to lowering their pay.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram