Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s swearing in makes history during unprecedented time for the Supreme Court

        Candice Norwood · June 30
      • Biden’s new environmental justice office aims to tackle the health impacts disproportionately faced by people of color

        Jessica Kutz · June 2
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: How pregnant people can prepare for a summer of heat waves

        Jessica Kutz · June 17
      • The 19th Explains: How new Title IX guidelines on sexual misconduct may give more help to survivors

        Nadra Nittle · June 14
      • The 19th Explains: How would overturning Roe v. Wade affect IVF?

        Jennifer Gerson · May 27
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Support The 19th

As a nonprofit newsroom, members are critical to our sustainability. Your financial support helps make our journalism possible.

Become a Member

Donate to support our mission

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Joe Biden delivers remarks in front of the White House.
(Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Abortion

Experts say Biden could use executive powers to protect abortion access

The White House vowed last October to pass laws that would maintain abortion protections. But so far, the administration has made little progress.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2022-02-07 05:00
5:00
February 7, 2022
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

With legislation shoring up abortion access unlikely to pass Congress and the Supreme Court poised to scale back protections, the Biden administration appears unlikely to fulfill its promises to expand and protect abortion access — unless, as some advocates are calling for him to do, he uses executive powers.

Abortion rights, while hardly a signature issue for President Joe Biden, were a major component of the National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality, a list of policy goals and commitments released in October by the administration. In that document, the White House vowed to “protect the constitutional right to safe and legal abortion established in Roe v. Wade.”

That commitment included “supporting the repeal of the Hyde Amendment,” which bars the use of federal funds to pay for an abortion. In practice, the Hyde Amendment prevents most states’ programs for Medicaid — the federal-state health insurance plan that covers low-income people — from covering abortion, which can cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Theoretically, the administration has taken steps in the direction of maintaining abortion access. It submitted a budget to Congress last May that would repeal the Hyde Amendment, though in Washington, the president’s budget is treated more as a signal of priorities than a serious policy proposal. It also endorsed the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that would codify Roe v. Wade protections. 

But the impact has been minimal. While both proposals have passed the U.S. House of Representatives, they have little chance of success in the Senate. Passing legislation such as the Women’s Health Protection Act requires 60 votes. Meanwhile, all 50 Democrats would need to unite to repeal the Hyde Amendment. Neither of those appears likely to happen. 

A newsletter you can relate to

Storytelling that represents you, delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The Senate is evenly split between the parties, but Democrats control the chamber because Vice President Kamala Harris has the tie-breaking vote. Two Democratic senators — Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania — are generally unfriendly toward legislation that expands abortion access and declined to sign on in support of the Women’s Health Protection Act. Democrats’ margin has for now become even slimmer, with Sen. Ben Ray Luján, of New Mexico, temporarily incapacitated after a stroke. 

Meanwhile, Biden has said little publicly about the White House’s stance on abortion rights. 

The White House did not respond to multiple requests for updates on how or when it hopes to move forward with either effort. But the looming midterm elections mean the window to pass either bill into law may be growing narrower. Democrats are considered at great risk of losing their slim governing majorities in both the House and Senate this November, though some believe a ruling by the Supreme Court that restricts abortion access could mobilize their voters. 

Some experts suggested that, given the limited possibilities in Congress, the administration should use executive power.

“Legislative fixes are nonstarters, and every second that’s spent trying to work on legislation is a second that’s not being spent trying to affect access on the ground,” said David Cohen, a professor at Drexel University’s Kline School of Law, who focuses on constitutional law and gender. “I don’t think anyone thinks legislation is going to happen, and if they do they’re living in a fantasy world.”

There are a few avenues the White House could take, suggested Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University who studies abortion. In particular, she said, the Biden administration should rely on the the Food and Drug Administration to issue regulations that expand access to medication abortion, a two-pill regimen that people can use to safely end a pregnancy at home up until 10 weeks. 

“The most significant thing the Biden administration has done is through the FDA, and the most significant things the Biden administration will be able to do going forward are through the FDA,” she said. 

  • More from The 19th
    Woman looks at phone with image of mifepristone
  • Laws restricting abortion may also limit options for people who miscarry
  • ‘You never forget it’: These are the stories of life before Roe v. Wade transformed America
  • Proposed bill would cover breastfeeding support for families fleeing natural disasters

Already, the administration has moved in that direction.This past December, the agency loosened regulations on how one of the medication abortion pills — a drug known as mifepristone — is dispensed. Previously, the agency held that the mifepristone must be administered in-person, even though medical groups have long said that the pill can be safely taken at home. 

The FDA’s move — initially prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and made permanent in December — allowed for medication abortion pills to be prescribed virtually and sent to patients through the mail, eliminating numerous barriers for patients who do not have the time or resources to travel to a licensed clinic or health care facility. 

But without more White House action, the impact will probably be limited. So far, 19 states have laws in place that require physicians to dispense mifepristone in-person, essentially rejecting the FDA guidance. More state legislatures are preparing similar legislation. The administration could attempt to overrule those state laws, Ziegler and others said, challenging them in court and arguing that the FDA regulations, as a representation of federal law, preempt state ones. 

There is no precedent for using FDA guidance to overrule state limitations on medication abortion. But it’s an argument that at least has a chance of succeeding in courts, legal experts said. 

“There is some support for the idea that states cannot ban FDA-approved medication,” said Greer Donley, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Law School, who specializes in laws surrounding medication abortion access. “This is a novel legal argument. Maybe it would mean states cannot ban the sale of medication abortion, which would mean states must allow abortion up to 10 weeks.”

Abortion rights activists demonstrate in front of Supreme Court.
Abortion rights activists demonstrate outside the Supreme Court in January 2022. (ALEX EDELMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

That could take on new relevance if the Supreme Court does use its major abortion case — Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — to overturn or severely weaken Roe v. Wade, an outcome legal observers say is highly likely. Such a ruling would eliminate the federal abortion rights guarantee and could allow states to ban abortion entirely. A decision in the case is expected this summer. 

If such an argument withstood legal challenges, it could render toothless any state law that attempted to ban abortion prior to 10 weeks of pregnancy. 

“If the Supreme Court does overrule Roe, there is more urgency for the Biden administration to pursue arguments like this,” Donley added. 

There are other strategies the administration could explore, experts said. The Department of Health and Human Services could encourage states to use their own Medicaid funds — which are not governed by the Hyde Amendment — to cover abortion services, though it’s not clear how much impact that would have. 

Cohen also suggested looking at whether the government could lease federal land to abortion clinics. In theory, those clinics could then operate within the borders of a state that has limited or even banned abortion. Since they would not be on state property, those clinics could be exempt from the state’s abortion laws and instead governed by only federal statute. (Similar approaches could be tried on reservation land, if tribal leaders also sought to maintain abortion access.)

Again, he added, it’s not guaranteed that such an approach would survive a court challenge. But it’s not out of the question, either. 

“It is possible that clinics can operate on federal lands without having to follow state law. That has to be explored. The federal government needs to push the envelope,” Cohen said. “It’s not a slam-dunk legal argument, but these are the kinds of things that need to be tried.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Support The 19th

As a nonprofit newsroom, members are critical to our sustainability. Your financial support helps make our journalism possible.

Become a Member

Donate to support our mission

Up Next

Woman looks at phone with image of mifepristone

Abortion

Laws restricting abortion may also limit options for people who miscarry

Advocates and physicians worry state legislation on medication abortion will also impact the availability of non-surgical treatment for miscarriage.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram