Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Biden’s new environmental justice office aims to tackle the health impacts disproportionately faced by people of color

        Jessica Kutz · June 2
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
      • Meet J. Michelle Childs, South Carolina judge and possible Supreme Court contender

        Candice Norwood · February 18
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: How pregnant people can prepare for a summer of heat waves

        Jessica Kutz · June 17
      • The 19th Explains: How new Title IX guidelines on sexual misconduct may give more help to survivors

        Nadra Nittle · June 14
      • The 19th Explains: How would overturning Roe v. Wade affect IVF?

        Jennifer Gerson · May 27
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Donate to get our member newsletter

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

ERA protest in 2018
From left, Carol Jenkins of the Equal Rights Amendment Task Force, actor Alyssa Milano, and Rep. Jackie Speier of California attend a news conference on ratifying the ERA on June 6, 2018. (Photo By Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call)

Politics

Federal judge dismisses legal effort to recognize Equal Rights Amendment

The Virginia attorney general is considering “any and all options moving forward, including an appeal”; U.S. House is expected to take up a related resolution this month.

Barbara Rodriguez

State Politics and Voting Reporter

Barbara Rodriguez portrait

Published

2021-03-06 10:13
10:13
March 6, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to formally recognize the Equal Rights Amendment, a legal setback for supporters who have been trying to add the amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The ruling comes just over a week before the U.S. House is expected to vote on a resolution that aims to effectively affirm that the amendment is viable, which supporters hope will clarify its status. But it’s still unclear what any of this will mean for the future of the amendment.

U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras said in a 37-page ruling released Friday evening that the lawsuit filed by three Democratic attorneys general did not have standing to proceed “laudable as their motives may be.”

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The Equal Rights Amendment, or ERA, proposes adding language to the U.S. Constitution that prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex, which its supporters believe will add legal protections for women. Some groups also believe it will provide protections against discrimination on the basis of gender and gender identity. The fight to add the ERA has lasted for decades, though, with opponents raising arguments about women’s roles and worries that it would add legal protections for abortion. (The 19th explains the history of the fight over the Equal Rights Amendment here.)

Congress passed the amendment in 1972 with the needed two-thirds majority vote, but with a stipulation that state legislatures ratify it in seven years. Three-fourths of state legislatures (38 out of 50) are needed to ratify any amendment, but only 35 did so for the ERA by the 1979 deadline amid a concerted campaign to stop its implementation. Congress extended the deadline by three years at the time, but no other legislatures ratified the amendment.

Then from 2017 to 2020, statehouses in Nevada, Illinois and Virginia ratified the ERA, starting a new debate about its status.

A newsletter you can relate to

Storytelling that represents you, delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The attorneys general for those states then sued, seeking to require the United States archivist to acknowledge the ERA by publishing and certifying the amendment as part of the Constitution. The archivist, under the National Archives and Records Administration, had refused to do so under guidance from the U.S. Department of Justice. The DOJ at the time issued an opinion citing the expired deadline on the ERA for not proceeding with adding the amendment.

Contreras made two main points in ruling that the attorneys general had no standing to sue: He believes the archivist’s actions “are formalities with no legal effect.” He also highlighted the deadlines set by Congress for ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment.

“Plaintiffs’ ratifications came too late to count,” he wrote.

Mark Herring, the attorney general in Virginia who helped file the lawsuit, said Friday night on Twitter that he was disappointed in the ruling and hinted at additional legal action.

“I’m not giving up this fight and I will consider any and all options moving forward, including an appeal,” he wrote. “It has been an honor to stand alongside every one of the advocates who has fought so hard to ensure women’s equality is protected under the Constitution and we won’t stop now.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Justice declined to comment. A message left with the National Archives and Records Administration on Saturday was not immediately returned.

Carol Jenkins, president and CEO of the ERA Coalition and the Fund for Women’s Equality said in a statement Friday night that she was “disappointed” in the decision. She said her organizations are “optimistic of validation on appeal.”

Jenkins also said supporters are focused on lobbying Congress to support a pair of ERA resolutions filed in both chambers. Supporters believe the resolutions effectively remove the deadline stipulation, which is not part of the original text of the amendment. While it is expected to pass in the House, which is scheduled to take up the measure the week of March 15, its fate in the closely divided Senate is less clear. 

Herring said he welcomed “any support from both the Biden Administration and Congress in ensuring that this amendment is recognized as part of the Constitution once & for all.”

Other supporters of the ERA see the path through Congress more favorably. Julie C. Suk, a legal scholar who coordinated and filed the constitutional law scholars’ amicus brief in the lawsuit, said in an email that the judge’s ruling on Friday did not consider the constitutionality of Congress’ ability to extend its deadline on the ERA. She is the author of “We The Women: The Unstoppable Mothers of the Equal Rights Amendment.”

“For a variety of reasons, my own view in many writings has been that the ERA has a much more promising path to survival in Congress rather than in the courts,” she said.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

2022 Hybrid Summit: 50 Years of Title IX

In case you missed it, watch our biggest event of the year

Watch Now

Donate to support our mission

Up Next

Demonstrators gathered outside the Georgia Capitol in opposition of the HB 531 bill.

Politics

Georgia is the epicenter of the fight over how Americans can vote

Legislators have filed dozens of bills that aim to change how people vote, and voting rights groups are pushing back.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram