Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: Who will be most impacted by Medicaid changes — and when

        Rebekah Barber · March 28
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Student walks out onto Fenway Park Field for graduation
Students arrive to Fenway Park for the Northeastern University Commencement in Boston on May 13, 2022. (Erin Clark/The Boston Globe/Getty Images)

Education

Working parents and people of color — not ‘elites’ — stand to benefit from student loan forgiveness, advocates say

In oral arguments before the Supreme Court this week, the Biden administration defended the president’s plan to forgive up to $20,000 in student debt.

Nadra Nittle

Education reporter

Nadra Nittle

Published

2023-03-03 15:30
3:30
March 3, 2023
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Your trusted source for contextualizing the news. Sign up for our daily newsletter.

More than 40 million Americans — disproportionately women, people of color and working-class borrowers — stand to have some or all of their school debt canceled if President Joe Biden’s student loan relief plan survives legal challenges now before the Supreme Court. For three and a half hours on Tuesday, the high court heard oral arguments for a pair of lawsuits opposing the Biden administration’s plan to forgive up to $20,000 in student debt for borrowers with annual incomes under $125,000.  

One point of contention is whether forgiveness is fair to people without student debt, with some justices echoing the popular Republican talking point that borrowers belong to a privileged slice of society thanks to their college degrees. Attorneys — and debt relief advocates — have challenged that notion.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

While arguing that the Biden administration had the right to cancel student debt, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar discussed the challenges borrowers face.

“Over the past three years, millions of Americans have struggled to pay rent, utilities, food, and many have been unable to pay their debts,” Prelogar said. “Loan forgiveness is a paradigmatic form of debt relief, and the [education] secretary acted within the heartland of his authority and in line with the central purpose of the HEROES Act in providing that relief here.”

The Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students (HEROES) Act of 2003 allows the education secretary to “waive or modify any statutory or regulatory provision” during national emergencies. Prelogar said that the secretary acted in accordance with the statute when he initiated the student debt relief program because the COVID-19 pandemic constituted a crisis. 

During the oral arguments, Prelogar “did an extraordinary job of myth-busting” about student loan borrowers, said Mike Pierce, executive director of Student Borrower Protection Center, a nonprofit focused on reducing student debt. Most borrowers aren’t affluent and many never completed their higher education. Borrowers say that loan debt has prevented them buying homes, starting families or simply making ends meet. 

“We know that 40 percent of all people that have student loans didn’t graduate from college,” Pierce said. “So, this is very much a progressive policy because it drives debt relief into communities that wouldn’t otherwise be reached by other kinds of programs. I think it’s also important to note that 26 million people filled out the government’s application before this Texas judge told them to take it down. And of those 26 million people, the vast majority live in communities where average incomes are lower middle class. That’s the typical borrower in America right now.”

Chief Justice John Roberts, however, invoked the “major questions doctrine” to question whether the Biden administration had the right to broadly forgive federal student debt. The doctrine prohibits federal agencies from making large-scale economic and political decisions without the go-ahead from Congress. He also stood out as one of the justices pressing the fairness of debt forgiveness and implying that borrowers have more advantages than, say, entrepreneurs who didn’t have the chance to attend college.

“Nobody’s telling the person who is trying to set up [a] lawn service business that he doesn’t have to pay his loan,” Roberts said. “He still does, even though his tax dollars are going to support the forgiveness of the loan for the college graduate, who’s now going to make a lot more than him over the course of his lifetime.”

Fenaba Addo, associate professor of public policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, told The 19th that the income caps included in the debt relief program ensure that elite Americans will not be the primary beneficiaries. According to the Biden administration, 90 percent of relief dollars will assist people who earn less than $75,000 annually.

While research indicates that people who attend college typically have higher lifetime earnings than those who did not, this is not always the case, especially in the example that Roberts provided. An entrepreneur in a male-dominated field such as lawn service will not necessarily earn less than women and people of color with a college education. Women who receive a higher education often become “pink-collar workers,” employed in fields such as teaching, social work and health care that traditionally have not paid as much as industries overrun by men — with or without college degrees. Moreover, many college-educated people of color lack generational wealth and experience a persistent wage gap that limits their ability to pay off student debt, depressing the wages they do earn.

Addo’s research on borrowers who have accumulated the most student debt and struggle with repayment reveal “pretty consistently across datasets that Black borrowers are struggling the most and have the most debt, specifically Black women,” she said. 

  • More from The 19th
    A graduate, surrounded by other graduates in caps and gowns, waives during a commencement ceremony.
  • Women — particularly women of color — stand to benefit most from Biden’s student loan relief plan
  • Five women on life with student loan debt — and how forgiveness from Biden could help
  • The Pell Grant exists because this woman lobbied for it

Such borrowers include women like Ifrah Abdalla who told The 19th that she has roughly $40,000 in student debt. Of Somali and Oromo heritage, Abdalla arrived in Minnesota as a child refugee from Ethiopia. In 2019, she earned a sociology degree from the University of Minnesota, becoming the first person in her family to graduate from college. Her journey to a bachelor’s degree was not easy: Abdalla had to balance her higher education with raising a small child. 

“As a single parent, it was so hard to balance being a full-time student and then trying to work full time,” she said. “So what I would do is I used [student loans] to help me with rent. We had to pay to park on the college campus. Even just basic tools that you needed to survive college, like your notebooks or just having a laptop. So my loans added up a lot faster than other students’ loans. …The American Dream has been sold to us since we were all children that we have to go to college to be successful. It’s just so expensive.”

Her student loans also helped her put her daughter in daycare while she attended classes. With the help of the Jeremiah Program, a national program based in Minneapolis that works to disrupt the cycle of poverty by helping single mothers achieve economic mobility, Abdalla was able to earn a college education.

Ashley Mages also credits the Jeremiah Program with helping her to graduate from college. She gave birth to a daughter in 2009 after becoming pregnant her senior year of high school, and the Jeremiah Program gave her access to housing and discounted onsite daycare. In 2014, she graduated from the University of Minnesota with a mechanical engineering degree. Although she worked three part-time jobs that helped her pay for daycare and living expenses and received a Pell Grant to help with college costs, Mages left college with $20,000 of student debt. Now working as a senior controls engineer, she managed to pay off her debt just a couple of years after college graduation by living very frugally — eating ramen, sharing housing and driving an old car that constantly broke down. Still, she doesn’t resent the Biden administration for trying to forgive the debt of lower- and middle-class people who have yet to pay off their loans. 

“If I still had the loans, I would [potentially] benefit and that is completely fine because I’m blessed and fortunate and privileged to be in a situation where that’s not a concern at this point,” she said. “When I was in that situation, it would have meant the world to me to have that burden released and to be able to prioritize other goals and other things that I needed.”

Addo said that student debt forgiveness and other government policies should not involve pitting groups of Americans against each other. She also challenged the idea, as the stories of Abdalla and Mages do, that only privileged people borrow money to attend college.

“Often, the narrative that people like to put out there is that it is elite people who went to elite colleges who have exorbitant amounts of debt,” she said. “But [student debt] is accumulated at all kinds of institutions.”

The Biden administration, for example, has forgiven the debts of people who attended predatory for-profit colleges. These institutions have primarily targeted low-income students and students of color who left them, often without a degree, to discover that the coursework they completed was not transferable to traditional academic institutions.          

Since announcing the debt relief plan in August, the Biden administration has faced a series of lawsuits that stopped the program from moving forward after millions of borrowers applied for forgiveness. Some of those cases are stuck in lower courts and others have been thrown out, but the two cases now before the Supreme Court question whether the Biden administration had the power to broadly forgive student debt. While state attorneys representing Republican-led Arkansas, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and South Carolina brought one lawsuit, the other was brought by two Texans who did not qualify for all the debt relief that was offered.  

The oral arguments focused heavily on whether the Biden administration could erase $400 billion in student debt without congressional approval. While conservatives on the Supreme Court suggested that the president did not have the executive authority to do so, legal experts and debt cancellation advocates say that the Biden administration may win the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs lack legal standing to sue. Article III of the Constitution indicates that individuals suing in federal court must demonstrate that a government policy has harmed them firsthand. Legal scholars on both sides of the partisan aisle contend that the federal forgiveness program has not injured any of the plaintiffs directly, a concern that emerged during oral arguments. 

“There were members of the conservative [Supreme Court] majority that voiced some skepticism about whether the president acted within the bounds of the law, but the lawyers that are watching this case focused really squarely on there not seeming like there is a majority on this court to find that these challenges have standing in the first place,” Pierce said. “And what that means is that you could have five or six justices take issue with whether or not this action was lawful, but nonetheless dismiss both of these cases and allow the president to deliver debt relief to everybody.”

The Supreme Court is expected to announce its decision on the student debt forgiveness program in the summer.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

A silhouetted student stands near a window in a college dormitory holding a laptop in one hand.

Education

College students have never had a roadmap for navigating sexual assault — until now

The Campus Accountability Map & Tool provides a breakdown of sexual violence on college campuses and highlights information survivors need, including important points of contact at academic institutions.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram