Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Immigration advocates rally to urge Congress to pass permanent protections for DACA recipients and create a pathway to citizenship, near the U.S. Capitol June 15, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Education

Ending DACA could mean direct consequences for women, teachers and students

An appeals court decision has imperiled the future of the program. If it ends, the education field could lose hundreds of teachers per month and affect students.

Nadra Nittle

Education reporter

Nadra Nittle

Published

2022-10-06 15:23
3:23
October 6, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

On Wednesday, the nation’s 600,000 Dreamers received mixed news about the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals Program (DACA): The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a Texas judge’s ruling that the program was implemented unlawfully but will maintain the program for current DACA recipients. Women represent over half of DACA recipients, and research indicates that women are the Dreamers most likely to attend college, a choice that would be off limits to many of them without the benefits of the program.

Started by former President Barack Obama in 2012, DACA allows undocumented people brought to the United States as children to live, work and study in the country without the threat of deportation if they meet certain criteria. These individuals are called Dreamers because of The DREAM Act, an unsuccessful 2001 bill that would have given them legal status. DACA has withstood multiple legal challenges since its launch, including former President Donald Trump attempting to end it, a move the Supreme Court blocked in 2020. But policy experts say the current threat to the program is the most serious to date. 

In fact, the federal government has frozen all new DACA applications since July 2021, when U.S. District Judge Andrew Hanen of Texas ruled that the Obama administration started the program illegally. That pause on new applicants remains in place after the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decision to affirm the Texas ruling on DACA, which celebrated its 10th anniversary in June. The latest ruling was not unexpected by the Biden administration, which moved to codify DACA in August “by finalizing a rule that will reinforce protections, like work authorization, that allow Dreamers to live more freely,” President Biden said in a statement then. Judge Hanen must now review the rule, slated to take effect October 31. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

  • More education coverage
    Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during the first meeting of the interagency Task Force on Reproductive Healthcare Access. President Biden can be seen tuning in remotely on a screen.
  • Education Department reinforces Title IX protections for abortion and pregnancy
  • Burned out and priced out: L.A. teachers are struggling
  • Higher pay, smaller class sizes, more special ed support: Why Seattle teachers are striking

If DACA remains closed off to new applicants or ultimately ends, there will be direct consequences for education, including for students and teachers. The education profession, overwhelmingly made up of women, is one of the top careers DACA recipients pursue. Already in the midst of a teaching shortage, the education field stands to lose 800 DACA-protected professionals per month for two years should the program be dismantled.  

The 19th spoke with Jessie Hernández-Reyes, policy analyst for higher education for the Education Trust, a national educational equity nonprofit, about how threats to DACA have affected students and families. She also discussed the advantages of the program and the avenues available to states, lawmakers and institutions to continue serving the undocumented population if DACA is struck down. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Nadra Nittle: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the Texas judge’s ruling that DACA was implemented unlawfully. What are your thoughts about the decision?

Jessie Hernández-Reyes: Yesterday’s decision by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals is alarming and has harmful future implications for current and future undocumented students and undocumented students in higher education. The Court of Appeals has sent the case back down to the Texas District Court to determine the lawfulness of the Biden’s Administration’s new rule on DACA, meaning that DACA is still in jeopardy of being struck down. Despite the overwhelming positive impact of this program, DACA continues to face uncertainty in the courts. Congress can permanently protect DACA recipients and expand the benefits of DACA to those not currently eligible for the program by providing the undocumented community a pathway to citizenship or expanding [or] reopening DACA.

A lot of folks in the higher ed space, and, also, just broadly in the undocumented student space, should be nervous about what’s happening. There have been a series of legal challenges to DACA since its inception. But if we go back a little bit in time to July of 2021 … when the [Texas] ruling happened, 80,000 applications were put on hold, so they have not been processed since then. Overall, this is nerve-racking for folks.

What benefits do DACA recipients in college have that other undocumented students do not? 

More than 427,000 undocumented individuals are enrolled in higher education, so one out of 50 students in higher ed is undocumented. However, from that larger group, less than half of the undocumented student population in higher ed is eligible or currently covered under DACA. I also want to highlight that this is a racial equity issue, since students of color overwhelmingly make up the population of undocumented students in higher ed. Forty-nine percent of them are Latino. Twenty-four percent are Asian American or [of] Pacific Islander background, and then 13 percent of them identify as Black. 

Right now, students that are covered under DACA are able to reap some of the benefits. For example, because DACA provides them work authorization, they have the ability to actually work as opposed to their undocumented student peers who don’t have access to DACA. DACA recipients are able to work on campus or work off campus because of this work authorization.

There [are] seven U.S. states where only DACA recipients can access in-state tuition and state financial aid. But if they weren’t covered under DACA, they wouldn’t be able to receive those benefits. One of those seven states is Massachusetts. If these students didn’t have DACA and had to pay out-of-state tuition, they would be paying three times the cost of tuition. By being able to access in-state tuition and state financial aid, they’re able to afford college a bit more. And, by association, they’re able to benefit from the economic and social mobility that comes from a college education.

College enrollment has declined during the pandemic, and ending DACA may result in even more students not attending college. What are your thoughts about that?

Undocumented students, including DACA recipients, are not eligible for federal financial aid under the Higher Education Act. That means they’re not eligible for federal student loans, work study or grants. So that already affects college affordability for them. And, again, depending on which state they’re in, they may or may not have access to in-state tuition or state financial aid. So these students are already facing barriers and challenges to affording college in the first place. I definitely do think institutions are missing out on this student population because if these students can’t afford it, they will likely not enroll, and there’s no vehicle for them to really take out loans. Either they’d have to resort to private loans or just take on this debt, which is not something that most students will do, especially if they have added responsibilities at home. There was a proposal to actually expand federal financial aid to DACA recipients. It didn’t end up going through, but that’s something else that could be done to address college affordability for undocumented individuals at large.

WASHINGTON, DC – JUNE 15: Immigration advocates rally to urge Congress to pass permanent protections for DACA recipients and create a pathway to citizenship, near the U.S. Capitol June 15, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

According to pro-immigration lobbying group FWD.us, if DACA ends, the teaching profession will be disproportionately affected, with losses of 800 teachers each month for two years. Can you discuss that?

It is troubling that 800 teachers with DACA per month for the next two years would be ousted from their jobs if DACA ends, given that there are already restrictions in many states on undocumented individuals obtaining a teaching license. In states where undocumented individuals are allowed to obtain teaching licenses, some states only allow for DACA recipients to obtain teaching licenses, among other professional/commercial licenses. The end of DACA would remove the possibility of current and future undocumented students in higher education to pursue teaching as a profession, which is sorely needed considering the current teaching shortage the country faces, and the importance of having a teacher workforce that is representative of [the] students in this country, where 98,000 undocumented students graduate from U.S. high schools every year.

What recourse is available to states or lawmakers who want to support undocumented people with or without DACA?

States that limit in-state tuition and state financial aid to undocumented students with DACA can make financial aid available to all undocumented students. Institutions themselves can also review the ways that they are supporting undocumented students. If a student comes to them and they want to talk about getting a lawyer, is there somewhere that they can go to talk about their case and what’s next? Something else that institutions can do is review what their opportunities are for undocumented students. Undocumented students without DACA are not legally able to work, but they can get income by becoming an independent contractor or starting a business or participating in a fellowship. Institutions of higher education can review some of their opportunities and see if they’re making sure that their fellowships are open to all undocumented students, since fellowships don’t require looking at a student’s legal status. 

Also in the states that don’t provide in-state tuition or state financial aid or even the possibility of receiving professional occupational licenses to undocumented students, they should broaden the access.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

What toll have legal challenges to DACA had on mixed-status families in which some members may be undocumented, some may be DACA-eligible and others may be citizens?

Let’s say that the student enrolled in higher ed [is] not necessarily undocumented but one of their family members is. That takes a large toll on them, especially in terms of their physical [and] emotional well-being because they’re awaiting a decision and they don’t know what’s going to happen to their family member. DACA provides the students some sense of physical and mental well-being since they are protected from deportation. There was a survey that was done on undocumented undergraduate students, and 40 percent of them reported thinking about their own deportation frequently, and almost half of those respondents surveyed said they thought about their parents’ or their guardians’ deportation more than once a week. So it’s something that is on the students’ minds pretty frequently.

Also, being in a mixed-status family, there might be one person with DACA who’s earning income. So this decision could mean the loss of an income or having to figure out how this person is going to bring income to this family given that their work authorization is stopped or that they’re subject to deportation because of the end of DACA. 

To qualify for DACA, one needs to meet certain criteria, such as earning a high school diploma or GED or currently being enrolled in school. And one must not have a serious criminal record. These requirements have received criticism from some immigrant advocates who believe it separates the community into “good” and “bad” immigrants. Do you agree?  

While we don’t have a specific position on the DACA requirements, we know that current DACA requirements, specifically the requirement that an individual must have continuously resided in the United States since June 15, 2007, up to the present time to be eligible for DACA, is limiting and bars many current undocumented students entering higher education from potentially accessing DACA if new applications were to be accepted anytime soon. The 2022 graduating high school class, for example, is one of the first graduating classes where most undocumented students are ineligible for DACA because they entered the U.S. after this date.

What’s your response to DACA’s detractors?

We have to consider what the contributions are of the undocumented population, and, then, specifically, of the undocumented student population. What do they contribute to our workforce, our economy and just society at large? Undocumented individuals are more likely than the average U.S. resident to be in the prime of their working years. Most undocumented individuals are also working, and, then, also, they have a pretty big impact in terms of what they contribute in terms of state and local taxes and their purchasing power. Research shows that undocumented individuals contributed $20 billion in taxes at the federal level, $12 billion at the state and local level, and then they possess [billions of dollars] in annual purchasing power. So undocumented individuals are here and they’re contributing and they’re active members of our society. Higher education is the vehicle for economic and social mobility. If we’re excluding this population from higher education, then our education is truly not accessible or equitable for everyone.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

Crystal Mason speaks on stage at a Beto O'Rourke rally in Forth Worth, Texas in March 2022.

Politics

States are stepping up prosecutions for voter fraud. But who gets the harshest punishment?

In a number of high-profile cases, women of color have been sentenced to time in prison — including Crystal Mason of Texas.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram