Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Patients' shoes are seen as they gather in the counseling area of the Jackson's Women's Health Organization
Patients gather in the counseling area at one of the last remaining abortion providers in the South, the Jackson Women's Health Organization in Jackson, Mississippi on June 7, 2022. (Erin Clark/The Boston Globe/Getty Images)

Abortion

The 19th Explains: Why some trigger laws still aren’t in effect after Roe v. Wade was overturned

The 19th breaks down the differences among the trigger laws, why some are being challenged and what this means for abortion access.

Jasmine Mithani

Data Visuals Reporter

Headshot of light-skinned person with shoulder-length hair and dark rimmed glasses

Published

2022-07-06 05:00
5:00
July 6, 2022
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Thirteen states passed laws meant to ban abortion after Roe v. Wade was overturned. Yet, two weeks after the Supreme Court’s decision, several of these so-called “trigger laws” are not in effect. 

Legal chaos has erupted across the country as attorneys general, state governors, legal advocates and journalists attempt to interpret the mess of laws to determine the status of abortion access. Much of this confusion has stemmed from trigger laws, as there was little legal precedent for how this kind of legislation would go into effect. The 19th breaks down the differences among the trigger laws, why some are being challenged and what this means for abortion access.

What are trigger laws?

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Trigger laws refer to abortion bans passed by state legislatures that would go into effect only if Roe v. Wade was overturned or some other circumstance made total bans legal. Thirteen states passed these trigger laws. 

When do trigger laws go into effect?

While all of the laws hinge on abortion legislation powers being returned to states, there are different conditions that have to be met before the law becomes enforceable. 

Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota’s bans went into effect immediately upon the Supreme Court ruling — as soon as the PDF of the opinion was published on the Supreme Court’s website.

The other 10 states require the formal step of certification before their bans could go into effect. Each state’s attorney general needs to review the Supreme Court’s decision with an eye for any potential barriers to enforcing an abortion ban, and then state in writing that there were no conflicts with current state or federal laws.

  • More abortion coverage
    Cathy Nix is seen walking and holding a clipboard outside Planned Parenthood. A couple other anti-abortion protesters sit near the clinic.
  • Pre-Roe abortion bans are cutting off access — even laws that aren’t supposed to be in effect
  • What abortion looks like in every state — right now
  • Abortions can continue in Louisiana and Utah for now after judges block trigger laws

So are all of the trigger bans now in effect? 

As of the late afternoon of July 5, every state except Wyoming received certification. In all states except Idaho, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming, certification was the final step before abortion was outlawed. 

Wyoming’s law goes into effect five days after certification, and the state has 30 days to certify.

Abortion bans in Idaho, Tennessee and Texas all go into effect 30 days after the Supreme Court issues a judgment, likely 25 days from the opinion date.

What’s the difference between an opinion, a ruling, an order and a judgment?

These terms are often used interchangeably, and only some have specific legal meaning, said Omar Noureldin, lecturer in law at the University of Southern California’s Gould School of Law. 

A ruling is not a specific legal term, but rather a general description of a case’s outcome, Noureldin explained. Some trigger laws were tied to a ruling that overturned Roe v. Wade.

Opinions are documents issued by courts to outline the result of the case and expand on the legal reasoning behind their decision. “It may expand on an area of law or it may clarify an area of law, or, in the case of the Dobbs decision, overrule an area of law,” Noureldin said. An opinion is what the Supreme Court published on June 25.

An order follows an opinion and directs the next steps for all parties involved in the case. In Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, the Supreme Court ordered that a judgment of the Fifth Circuit Court be reversed and that the lower court take over additional administrative steps. This was written in the same document as the opinion. 

Idaho, Tennessee and Texas’ trigger bans all go into effect 30 days after a judgment, which is the final say in a case — no more appeals, no more rehearings. Noureldin referenced the rules of the Supreme Court, which state any motion for a rehearing must be submitted within 25 days of the order announcement. After the window for rehearings closes, the decision is considered final and is entered as a judgment per the court order.  

Since any motion for rehearing needs to be granted by a court majority, there is almost no chance of reconsideration in the Dobbs case. In that case, the date of judgment would be no earlier than July 20. 

Activists gather near the Tennessee State Capital building. Signs read "Stand with Black women, "Against abortion? Ignore it like you do kids in foster care," "Y'all pro-life until the baby is black, brown, immigrant, LGBTQ, poor, disabled" and "not your body, not your decision"
Activists gather near the Tennessee State Capital building in Nashville in May 2022. (SETH HERALD/AFP/Getty Images)

If states can create their own laws, why are some trigger laws being blocked by courts?

Overruling Roe v. Wade means abortion bans are now federally constitutional, but new laws still need to comply with each state’s own legal code. In some way, versions of the seminal court case are now playing out across the country.

Trigger laws in Kentucky, Louisiana and Utah have been temporarily blocked. The injunctions in Kentucky and Louisiana prevent the laws from being enforced until full cases are heard by local courts. 

A Louisiana judge will hear arguments starting July 8; the suit claims the law is too vague, stymying proper interpretation. No date has been set for Kentucky’s suit.

Utah’s law was temporarily blocked for 14 days after Planned Parenthood of Utah argued that the sudden loss of abortion rights would negatively impact the health of state residents. The suit also asserted that the abortion ban violated rights guaranteed under the state constitution. Currently, Utah’s ban is set to be reinstated on July 11. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

What does all this mean for people trying to access abortion?

The legal status of abortion in some states with trigger laws has been changing almost hourly, forcing clinics to cancel appointments and redirect care. On the date of the Supreme Court ruling, abortion providers had to tell patients in waiting rooms that they could no longer be treated. 

Some clinics, like in West Virginia and Wisconsin, stopped providing abortions as a precaution against unclear pre-Roe bans. In the immediate aftermath of the ruling, Arizona’s clinics stopped providing abortions as lawmakers fought over contradictory laws. 

It’s unclear how some trigger laws will be enforced. In an abundance of caution, Planned Parenthood of Montana has stopped providing medication abortions to patients from states banning abortion.

Temporary holds have provided some relief, as clinics in Utah and Louisiana have confirmed to The 19th that they have resumed providing abortions. But the future is uncertain: some clinics are staying open to provide other forms of reproductive care, and others are relocating to states where abortion is protected.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

From the Collection

The 19th Explains

People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
  • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

    Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

    Kate Sosin · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

    Mariel Padilla · December 1

Up Next

Boxes of the drug mifepristone line a shelf at an Alabama abortion clinic.

Abortion

State-level abortion bans could restrict care in neighboring states, too. Here’s how.

A Montana abortion provider decided to limit what kinds of abortions it offers out-of-state patients. It could foreshadow similar moves elsewhere.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram