Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

protesters sit around a yellow sign for abortion rights inside the indiana state capitol in indianapolis
INDIANAPOLIS, IN - JULY 25: A group of abortion rights activists sit around a sign inside of the Indiana State Capitol building on July 25, 2022 in Indianapolis, Indiana. Activists are gathering during a special session of the Indiana state Senate concerning abortion access in the state. (Photo by Jon Cherry/Getty Images) (Jon Cherry/Getty Images)

Abortion

Indiana Senate committee advances near-total abortion ban after eight hours of public testimony

More than 60 people testified, and not a single person was in favor of the bill. The Indiana Senate Committee on Rules and Legislative Procedure voted on Tuesday to advance it.

Mariel Padilla

General Assignment Reporter

Mariel Padilla portrait

Published

2022-07-26 14:58
2:58
July 26, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

INDIANAPOLIS — High school students, religious leaders, doctors, nurses, mothers, advocates, a former legislator from a neighboring state and a staff member from the attorney general’s office stood one by one before an Indiana Senate committee. Without exception, they all argued against SB 1, a bill that would completely ban abortion with a few narrow exceptions, including if the life of the pregnant person is at risk and in cases of rape or incest, though some thought it was too weak while others argued against any new restrictions. 

After nearly eight hours of public testimony from about 60 people, the Indiana Senate Committee on Rules and Legislative Procedure on Tuesday voted 7-5 during a special session to advance the new abortion restrictions. Indiana is the first state to meet and focus on new restrictions since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, which had provided a federal right to an abortion. The full Senate will convene Thursday to offer and debate amendments to the bill, and a final vote is expected on Friday. 

Hundreds of people had registered to speak, but limited time meant only a fraction were able to take the microphone. Each witness had three minutes to convey their opinion, and many faced questioning from the lawmakers. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Not a single person testifying was in favor of SB 1: Many, including all of the anti-abortion organizations that were represented, didn’t think the bill went far enough to restrict abortions. Some felt the language was too vague and open to too much interpretation, while other speakers were opposed to any restrictions on abortion care altogether. 

Just before the committee voted, Sen. Sue Glick, a Republican and author of the bill, urged her colleagues to advance the bill to the full Senate, despite what she called its shortcomings. Glick and several other Republicans acknowledged that “nobody agrees it’s a perfect bill.”  

  • More from The 19th
    A woman holds a sign at a protest in Indianapolis.
  • Indiana opens special session to debate near-total abortion ban
  • Indiana doctor performed abortion for a 10-year-old girl, document shows
  • What abortion looks like in every state — right now

“Am I happy with the bill? Not exactly,” Glick said. “Nor was I happy when it was drafted. This is a very difficult process, and it’s a very difficult issue. It involves some of the most intimate things that could possibly be discussed. I’m asking for support from this committee that we’ll bring it to the floor so we can discuss it in detail, and if it’s the will of the body to kill the bill on the floor — then so be it.” 

Sen. Ed Charbonneau, a Republican who voted to advance the bill, said he hoped that input from the full Senate would help make a “bad bill less bad.” 

The proposed legislation included exceptions for rape and incest — exceptions that anti-abortion advocates argue might not have been included if not for news that a 10-year-old girl who was sexually assaulted in Ohio became pregnant and traveled to Indiana to terminate the pregnancy. 

The atmosphere in the Senate chamber was charged: Committee members sat up front, and the senators’ usual seats were filled with members of the public hoping to testify. Every seat in the public gallery was taken, with police stationed at the doors to keep rowdy protestors out and ensure the chamber remained civil. Those in the gallery were told no clapping, no boo-ing, no holding signs during the testimonies. Still, there were many snaps, a few outbursts and the occasional but brief applause. And the steady hum of hundreds of protesters in the lobby, chanting and carrying signs to display in the glass windows at the back of the chamber, provided a backdrop to the entire proceeding.

At one point after concluding public testimony — which included a mix of personal stories and expert witness — Senate Minority Leader Greg Taylor, a Democrat, was brought to tears, recalling his sister’s unplanned pregnancy at 16. Taylor recalled the trauma that his sister went through, and continues to go through, and said he couldn’t fathom forcing other young women to undergo the same. 

anti-abortion advocates in blue at the Indiana Capitol
(Mariel Padilla/The 19th)

Many medical professionals testified as well, though their critiques of the bill varied. Some worried that the bill would discourage obstetrician-gynecologists from providing care in rural areas, specifically, out of fear that they will run afoul of the law and be charged with a felony. Others argued that the bill relies too heavily on the “medical judgment” of physicians in determining whether and at what point the life of the mother is at risk and if a fetal anomaly is fatal enough to justify the abortion under the law. Still, some physicians who oppose abortion pushed for more accountability and enforcement requirements in the bill text — insisting that physicians who provide abortions against the law should face criminal consequences in addition to losing their licenses. 

Many religious leaders and ministers, overwhelmingly Christian, testified, often quoting the Bible to argue that abortion should be criminalized with no exception on moral grounds. The prospect of eternal damnation was invoked, with senators and witnesses discussing at length who would go to hell and how that is decided. There were, however, a couple religious leaders, including a rabbi, that argued against any infringement on a woman’s autonomy. 

Clare Stephens, a registered nurse who testified Tuesday, said she was against the bill because it didn’t go far enough to restrict abortion access in Indiana. Stephens particularly took issue with the language in the bill that allowed for abortion when the fetus was diagnosed with an “irremediable medical condition.” She shared her story: When her mother was four months pregnant with Stephens and her twin sister, doctors diagnosed twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) — a serious prenatal condition in which twins share unequal amounts of the placenta’s blood supply. In the majority of cases, only one baby survives to birth. The doctors encouraged Stephens’s mother to terminate the pregnancy, she said, because the twins had a less than 20 percent chance of survival, and if they did survive would likely have severe handicaps or birth defects. 

“Again and again, the doctors pushed and pressured our parents to abort us,” Stephens said in her testimony. “Three times a week, mom went in for an ultrasound and three times a week these doctors would emphasize that it’s not too late to terminate pregnancy.” 

Stephens and her twin sister were born at 35 weeks without any complications. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“The doctors got it wrong, and we are not alone,” Stephens said. “I represent thousands. Born with a fetal anomaly or not, don’t our lives have value?” 

Danielle Spry, a registered labor and delivery nurse and a mother whose fetus was diagnosed with a fatal fetal anomaly, also testified the day prior that she was against the bill. However, Spry said she believed every woman should have the right to choose. About 18 weeks into her second pregnancy, Spry said, her doctor saw an anomaly on the ultrasound. After further examination, the doctor found that Spry’s fetus had a large hole in her diaphragm, not allowing for lung development, and would certainly suffocate to death at birth. 

“My husband and I knew that as much as we loved her and as much as we wanted to bring her home, allowing her to suffer was not an option,” Spry said. “We ended our pregnancy at 19 weeks and six days, which was the last day in Indiana we could legally have the procedure. … I cannot even fathom the trauma if I didn’t have that choice and was forced to carry her to term, fielding questions from strangers about my growing belly.” 

The Indiana House is expected to take up the anti-abortion measure next week. If the legislation passes, then it will take effect in September.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

Rep. Cori Bush is walking up a set of stairs at the U.S. Capitol.

Abortion

Rep. Cori Bush wants to establish a federal office to fund reproductive care

A proposed bill would set up a place in the Department of Health and Human Services to support efforts like family planning, doula care and mobile clinics.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram