Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
      • Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s swearing in makes history during unprecedented time for the Supreme Court

        Candice Norwood · June 30
      • Biden’s new environmental justice office aims to tackle the health impacts disproportionately faced by people of color

        Jessica Kutz · June 2
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: Why some trigger laws still aren’t in effect after Roe v. Wade was overturned

        Jasmine Mithani · July 6
      • The 19th Explains: How pregnant people can prepare for a summer of heat waves

        Jessica Kutz · June 17
      • The 19th Explains: How new Title IX guidelines on sexual misconduct may give more help to survivors

        Nadra Nittle · June 14
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • ‘There are a lot of people who don’t want to know the truth’: Why an Arizona election official is leaving her job

        Barbara Rodriguez · July 18
      • Abortion is directly on the ballot in at least five states this year

        Barbara Rodriguez · July 15
      • States add early voting, and women could benefit — but it’s complicated

        Barbara Rodriguez · June 16

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Donate to get our member newsletter

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Photo illustration of Supreme Court justices with the writers of the Dobbs dissent emphasized
Rena Li for The 19th

Abortion

Liberal justices’ dissent sketches out ‘the loss of power, control, and dignity’ in a post-Roe America

“After today, young women will come of age with fewer rights than their mothers and grandmothers had,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote.

Amanda Becker

Washington Correspondent

Amanda Becker portrait

Published

2022-06-24 17:38
5:38
June 24, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority on Friday overturned Roe v. Wade by finding that abortion is not a “liberty” protected by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Its writers did not specify that it was, they said.

The court’s liberal justices countered in a scathing dissent that of course the writers didn’t specify it, they were all men. At the time of the amendment’s passage, first-wave feminists were explicitly told that it “was not their time to seek constitutional protections.” They wouldn’t even get the right to vote for another 50 years. 

“Of course, ‘people’ did not ratify the Fourteenth Amendment. Men did. So it is perhaps not so surprising that the ratifiers were not perfectly attuned to the importance of reproductive rights for women’s liberty, or for their capacity to participate as equal members of our nation,” Justice Stephen Breyer wrote on behalf of himself and Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“Those responsible for the original Constitution, including the Fourteenth Amendment, did not perceive women as equals, and did not recognize women’s rights,” Breyer continued, adding that the court may as well rely on standards from the Dark Ages, and that this “consigns women to second-class citizenship.”

Breyer’s dissent on behalf of the court’s dwindling liberal wing was in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, concerning a 15-week abortion ban in Mississippi. The court’s 6-3 conservative majority said that the law could stand. Five of them also agreed that “the Constitution does not prohibit the citizens of each state from regulating or prohibiting abortion.” 

  • More abortion coverage
    A demonstrator holding a sign that reads
  • Roe v. Wade has been overturned. In these states, abortion access will no longer be accessible.
  • From marriage equality to interracial marriage, Supreme Court conservatives appear divided on handling civil rights after Roe decision
  • Here’s when each trigger law banning abortion could go into effect

In doing so, they tossed out the court’s 1973 Roe decision establishing the right to an abortion, along with its 1992 ruling in Casey v. Planned Parenthood that affirmed it. “The court overrules those decisions and returns that authority to the people and their elected representatives,” Justice Samuel Alito wrote on behalf of a five-justice conservative majority. 

“The majority tries to hide the geographically expansive effects of its holding. Today’s decision, the majority says, permits ‘each State’ to address abortion as it pleases. That is cold comfort, of course, for the poor woman who cannot get the money to fly to a distant state for a procedure,” Breyer writes. 

States will indeed now determine whether people have access to abortion care and to what extent. There are 13 states with so-called “trigger laws” on the books that were written to ban abortion if and when Roe was overturned. As of late Friday afternoon, at least five — Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Missouri, South Dakota — had already taken effect. Other states have pre-Roe statutes on the books restricting abortion that will again be in place. Some Republicans in the House of Representatives will soon introduce a proposed federal 15-week ban based on Mississippi’s law. 

The conservative majority in the Dobbs case said that one problem with Roe and Casey is that they can be difficult to implement — Casey said states could place restrictions on abortion, for example, so long as it didn’t create an “undue burden” for people to obtain one. But determining undue burdens is left up to the courts. Breyer argues that the new patchwork of state laws taking effect will create even greater legal chaos.

  • The Latest:
    Greyed out map with text that reads
  • The Latest: What abortion looks like in every state — right now

“Must a state law allow abortions when necessary to protect a woman’s life and health? And if so, exactly when? How much risk to a woman’s life can a state force her to incur, before the Fourteenth Amendment’s protection of life kicks in?” Breyer asks.

He walks through examples. First, a birthing parent with pulmonary hypertension who has a 30 to 50 percent risk of dying if they continue the pregnancy. Then, is using dilation and evacuation or medication for miscarriage management an abortion? What about someone who travels across state lines after their home state bans abortion care? Can health care providers in a state that protects access to abortion send medication to a patient in another state?

“The Constitution protects travel and speech and interstate commerce, so today’s ruling will give rise to a host of new constitutional questions. Far from removing the Court from the abortion issue, the majority puts the Court at the center of the coming ‘interjurisdictional abortion wars,’” Breyer wrote. 

Breyer reserves the bulk of the dissent to examining whether Friday’s ruling will change what it means to be an American who can give birth in 2022, when more than half the U.S. population is now not fully covered by the privacy rights implied in the 14th Amendment.

“The loss of power, control, and dignity will be immense,” he writes.

Want the latest abortion coverage?

Subscribe to The 19th News(letter), delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“As of today, this Court holds, a state can always force a woman to give birth, prohibiting even the earliest abortions. A state can thus transform what, when freely undertaken, is a wonder into what, when forced, may be a nightmare,” he continues.

This is the picture that Breyer paints: It is highly likely that some day very soon a woman will be forced to bear her rapist’s child — even if it is a young girl pregnant by her father. Pregnant parents could be compelled to carry fetuses to term that have severe physical abnormalities and cannot survive outside the womb. Abortion providers could face criminal liability — and abortion patients, too. 

“Whatever the exact scope of the coming laws, one result of today’s decision is certain: the curtailment of women’s rights, and of their status as free and equal citizens,” Breyer wrote. 

“After today, young women will come of age with fewer rights than their mothers and grandmothers had.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Support The 19th

As a nonprofit newsroom, members are critical to our sustainability. Your financial support helps make our journalism possible.

Become a Member

Donate to support our mission

Up Next

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland arrives at a press conference in Washington, D.C.

Abortion

The Biden administration just hinted at how it could protect access to medication abortion

The administration may try to “preempt” state laws banning medication abortions, officials suggested.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram