Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A view of the U.S. Supreme Court under a cloudy sky.
The court said that it will merge the Justice Department's case with another legal challenge, which was initiated by abortion providers in Texas. (Photo by BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/Getty Images)

Abortion

Supreme Court to hear two challenges to Texas abortion law on November 1

In the interim, the law — which has effectively ended access to abortion in Texas — will remain in effect

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2021-10-22 11:48
11:48
October 22, 2021
am

Updated

2021-10-22 15:59:48.000000
America/New_York

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The U.S. Supreme Court said Friday that it will hear two challenges to Texas’ six-week abortion ban on November 1. In the interim, the law — which has effectively ended access to abortion in Texas — will remain in effect.

The Court’s decision comes in response to a legal challenge initiated by the Department of Justice, which has argued the federal government suffers particular harm as a result of the Texas law. The government is also arguing that the law runs directly afoul of the precedent established in Roe v. Wade, which held that the Constitution guarantees the right to an abortion up until a fetus can live independently outside the womb — typically around 24 weeks of pregnancy. 

The court said that it will merge this case with another legal challenge, which was initiated by abortion providers in Texas. The case could shape abortion rights for decades. If the court somehow upholds the Texas law, it will almost certainly pave the way for similar legislation in other anti-abortion states.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

In a partial dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor supported the court’s decision to take on the case but issued scathing criticism of its refusal to block the law.

“These circumstances are exceptional. Women seeking abortion care in Texas are entitled to relief from this Court now. Because of the Court’s failure to act today, that relief, if it comes, will be too late for many,” Sotomayor wrote. 

The Texas law has been in effect for almost two months. Rather than criminalizing the procedure, it says that anyone who “aids or abets” an abortion after six-weeks could be sued by private citizens. A successful plaintiff would receive at least $10,000, and have legal fees reimbursed by the state.

The court will not specifically examine the constitutionality of a six-week ban. Rather, the justices will be looking at the legality of Texas’ private enforcement setup, as well as whether the Justice Department has the right to challenge the law. But regardless of the specific questions at play, a decision in favor of Texas could still signal to other anti-abortion lawmakers that a ban like Texas’ is a viable path to pursue.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The law has virtually eliminated access to the procedure in Texas. Many clinics have stopped providing abortions altogether. Those who can afford the journey and are past six weeks of pregnancy are seeking abortions in surrounding states, including Oklahoma, New Mexico, Arkansas and Kansas. But many others — particularly those without the time off, financial resources or child care to travel out of state — may end up carrying unwanted pregnancies to term. 

Abortions are now virtually unavailable for minors in Texas, who are required to either get parental consent or go through a special judicial approval process that makes it very difficult to meet the six-week deadline. Undocumented teens who are seeking abortions have been sent to immigration facilities in other states, because most of them already past six weeks when they discover they are pregnant.

“Texans deserved better than this,” said Amy Hagstrom Miller, the CEO of Whole Woman’s Health, one of Texas’ biggest abortion providers. “The legal limbo is excruciating for both patients and our clinic staff.  Lack of access to safe abortion care is harming our families and communities, and will have lasting effects on Texas for decades to come. We’ve had to turn hundreds of patients away since this ban took effect, and this ruling means we’ll have to keep turning patients away.”

The federal government has sought legal relief. But the impact has been limited.

On October 6, a lower federal court first issued an injunction blocking the Texas law. U.S. District Court Judge Robert Pitman wrote that SB 8 had already resulted in “irreparable harm,” both for Texans seeking abortions and for the state’s fragile network of abortion clinics. He also wrote that the law clearly violated the Roe v. Wade precedent.

Only two days later, though, the injunction was in turn blocked by the conservative U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit, which has jurisdiction over federal cases out of Texas. 

Texas’ labyrinth of abortion restrictions — including a requirement that anyone seeking an abortion wait 24 hours between doctors’ visits — means that few patients were able to access the procedure in the brief window between rulings. 

And at the time, many doctors indicated that they still did not feel safe providing abortions after six weeks, given the likelihood on an unfavorable 5th Circuit ruling. That is in large part because SB 8 includes a retroactive provision that means doctors who perform abortions even when the law is blocked could later be sued, if the law is reinstated.

President Joe Biden has criticized the Texas law, but the White House has not laid out any specific contingency plan in the event it is upheld.

“The President has been clear in his position that SB 8 is blatantly unconstitutional. It not only violates the right to safe and legal abortion established under Roe v. Wade, but it creates a scheme to allow private citizens to interfere with that right,” White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said.

The long-term future is uncertain. The court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is generally considered hostile toward abortion rights. The court is also scheduled to hear a separate abortion case — Dobbs v. Jackson Woman’s Health — on December 1. That case examines the constitutionality of a 15-week abortion ban that was passed in Mississippi but has not taken effect.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Abortion

Proposed budget bill injects funding for reproductive health — and drops the Hyde Amendment

A bill introduced in the Senate Appropriations Committee puts the focus on reproductive rights by proposing an end to the Hyde Amendment and offering an unprecedented level of funding for Title X

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram