Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Amy Klobuchar speaks at the Capitol on the For the People Act
Sen. Amy Klobuchar, with Sens. Jeff Merkley, left, and Chuck Schumer, speaks at the Capitol on March 17 about the For the People Act. (Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via AP Images)

Politics

Sen. Amy Klobuchar thinks this is the time to pass major voting legislation

As the Senate takes up a sweeping voting rights bill, the Minnesota senator says opposition to the ‘For the People Act’ reinforces the need for filibuster reform. 

Amanda Becker

Washington Correspondent

Amanda Becker portrait

Published

2021-03-24 08:42
8:42
March 24, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The U.S. Senate’s rules panel on Wednesday will begin debating a sweeping voting access and ethics bill offered by Democrats known as the “For the People Act,” which is intended to expand voting rights and curb the influence of money in politics.

The legislation passed the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives earlier this month as Republican-controlled state legislatures across the country pushed to implement new restrictions on voting after record turnout in the 2020 elections. There was no evidence of irregularities that affected the outcome of the election, which some officials in defeated President Donald Trump’s administration called “the most secure in American history.”

Democratic Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, who chairs the Senate Rules Committee, detailed the For the People Act to The 19th. She explained why she thinks the proposed legislation has a chance of becoming law in the evenly divided chamber after stalling in previous congressional sessions and why she supports changing Senate procedure to get it done. While Klobuchar has said for some time that she was open to making changes to the filibuster, she recently told Mother Jones she thinks the Senate should get rid of the requirement that means most legislation needs 60 votes to pass.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

What is the For the People Act and what are its most important elements? 

The For the People Act is about making it easier for our democracy to work and giving people a say. There’s a reason we use the first few words of the Constitution in describing it, and that is that we the people are the fundamental source of our democracy. And unfortunately, in the words of our new senator, [Raphael] Warnock of Georgia, there are some people who don’t want some people to vote, and that’s why it’s so important to put these protections in place: first, making voting easier; second, getting big money out of politics; third, strengthening the ethics rules. We had a record number of Americans vote — 160 million, nearly — and you wonder how that happened in the middle of a public health crisis, a horrific pandemic? Well, it’s because a lot of states made it easier. They took requirements that you needed a notary to get an absentee ballot and they made vote by mail the norm, while still allowing people to vote in person. They opened up early voting for safety reasons. And to take that all away with over 250 bills that have been introduced now across the country in state legislatures would be a travesty. It is Exhibit A for why we need to pass this bill.

Voting access is an issue that you’ve been working on generally for some time now. This bill was around during the last Congress but not taken up by the Senate. Why do you think things could be different this time around?

People are very aware after what happened last year that there are people trying to take away the vote. I think before, maybe it was just a bunch of studies and bills in certain states and obvious voter suppression, but now it’s become a national discussion because people know very well about the lawsuits, and the insurrection, that’s been a major shift. The second thing this is, the first time I’ve ever gotten to have a hearing. We’ve never had a hearing in the U.S. Senate on this bill because we [Democrats] didn’t have the gavel. Now — and this is the full circle of our democracy — because people were allowed to vote in Georgia, because people really pushed, people like Stacey Abrams, so that happened. We [Democrats] now have the U.S. Senate because the people voted and they voted for [Sen. Jon] Ossoff and Warnock [Georgia’s newly elected Democratic senators] and so now we’re having the hearing and now we can pass the bill. In fact, right now as we speak, there are people in Georgia trying to limit the right to vote. So, to me, this has been a year of focus on voting that changes the dialogue, and we also have the ability to have the gavel and bring the bill to the floor after we get it through committee.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

This is the first hearing on this bill in the Senate. What should people expect? What might the process look like? 

This is going to be the major hearing, and part of that is because we may have other hearings about voting in the Rules Committee and about ideas, but it was really important to have one major hearing. The House has already passed this bill. We are having some key witnesses, including Eric Holder, the former attorney general, who now works on voting rights issues. [Michigan] Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson is an expert on this and made a bunch of reforms in her state. The director of the Brennan Center [which tracks legislation on voting] will be testifying. Fred Wertheimer, who is the former president of Common Cause, and probably the most interesting name among them is the former Republican chair of the Federal Election Commission, Trevor Potter, he’s testifying for us, he’s testifying for the bill. Tiffany Muller, the president of End Citizens United, she’s also testifying. 

Do you think that this bill is something that the two parties in the Senate can come together on? Has there been any initial outreach to your Republican colleagues? Do you think there’s space for people to work together on this?

There are nine major provisions in this bill that are bipartisan, so let’s start with that, including a number of mine. I have 15 things in here but one of them is the Honest Ads Act [which would apply rules on advertising transparency to online ads]. There’s the election security with backup paper ballots that’s in there, that’s bipartisan. You also have the fact that there are secretaries of state and governors of both parties, and significantly Republicans, that have supported a number of elements in this bill. Democrats and Republicans in the real world, as in not in Washington, D.C., support this bill. In one poll 62 percent, another poll over 70 percent. Just because you’ve got the opposition of [Republican Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell or something like that doesn’t mean that’s where the people of this country are.

You just mentioned a bunch of provisions that are bipartisan. Do you think that this will end up coming to a vote as a big package, like in the House, or do you see a scenario in which it might get broken up into different pieces depending on which has the most support?

Because we waited for a decade to do anything on this, there’s a reason that we have three pillars here, with ethics and campaign finance and of course with voting, the principal pillar. So at this point we’re keeping the bill together, for sure. Just like it was in the House.

This bill, like almost everything going forward, is getting wrapped up in talk about filibuster reform. You’ve said for some time now that you were open to filibuster reform, and in the past couple of weeks you’ve clarified what that could mean. Did this bill inspire you to refine your thinking on that subject? 

I have been very clear that I thought we needed to make reforms to the filibuster. I thought that before we saw some of this opposition to this bill. But, if anything, this just really reinforces what I believe. If we can’t salvage our democracy because people are trying to stop people from voting, we shouldn’t be relying on archaic rules to let people plow right over our democracy, because that’s what they’ve been doing, and that’s what they tried to do with all those lawsuits that were thrown out, and there’s nothing more fundamental than the right to vote.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

Incoming GOP women members of Congress

Politics

Women are still less than one-third of Congress and state legislatures, even after two big election cycles

A Republican rebound drove overall gains in 2020, but women are still underrepresented at all legislative levels, according to a new analysis by Rutgers University’s Center for Women and Politics.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram