Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Two people holding hands at their ewdding.
In uncertain moments like these, LGBTQ+ advocates typically reassure their communities that, even in a worst case scenario, the law will protect them. This time could be different. (AJ Reynolds/Athens Banner-Herald via AP)

LGBTQ+

A more conservative Supreme Court could bring drastic changes for LGBTQ+ Americans

Across the nation, queer people are debating fast-tracking major life changes, expecting that rights they now have could be stripped away.

Kate Sosin

LGBTQ+ reporter

Kate Sosin portrait

Published

2020-09-25 17:01
5:01
September 25, 2020
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Carl Charles never liked guns. The product of a conservative military family in Colorado, Charles resisted learning to shoot at a young age. When he was in high school, the Columbine High School massacre — which his friends survived — cemented his fears. 

That lifelong aversion suddenly shifted last Friday when Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died, and President Donald Trump said he wanted to fill her seat before the November presidential election. 

“I think with the dangers inherent in what a really virulent conservative majority on the Supreme Court could mean for many people, not just LGBT people, but in particular, I’m thinking about LGBT people of color… I started to think about that need to protect myself and my family,” he said.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Charles is transgender, and his husband is a Black man. The couple is very visibly queer, he says. They’re planning a move from New York to Atlanta, a city that Charles describes as a blue dot “in the middle of a very big red sea.”

And so, all things considered, Charles has concluded he might need guns. He’s learning how to use them.

In uncertain moments like these, LGBTQ+ advocates typically reassure their communities that, even in a worst case scenario, the law will protect them. But Charles isn’t just another queer person trying to read the tea leaves. He’s a staff attorney at Lambda Legal, the nation’s largest LGBTQ+ legal organization. He’s among the legal team battling Trump’s military ban. With a 6-3 conservative court, he thinks some of the hardest-won gains for equality could be on the chopping block.

“I think what’s plausible, and will probably be first and foremost, is marriage equality,” Charles said. “But I don’t think that will be a one track attack for them. I think they’ll be doing all of this simultaneously,” adding that a number of trans rights cases are currently making their ways through the courts. 

Transgender student Gavin Grimm’s five-year battle with his Virginia school board to use a boy’s bathroom at his high school is likely to hit the Supreme Court after an appeals court twice ruled in his favor. And a case involving Drew Adams, another transgender student who won his federal case in Florida to use a bathroom at his high school, might also be headed to the Supreme Court. 

Trump said he plans to announce his nominee on Saturday. Lambda lawyers said the top contenders fall far short of Ginsburg’s legacy when it comes to applying the law fairly for LGBTQ+ Americans. 

Five years from now, is this going to be possible in the same way? You can’t really know the answer. 

Lambda Legal and 26 other LGBTQ+ advocacy organizations vociferously opposed potential nominee Amy Coney Barrett during her 2017 confirmation to the 7th Circuit, referencing her affiliation with Alliance Defending Freedom, an anti-LGBTQ+ legal organization that the Southern Poverty Law Center has designated as a hate group. Barrett also signed onto a letter that praised the Catholic church’s teachings “on marriage and family founded on the indissoluble commitment of a man and a woman.” 

Another potential pick, Allison Jones Rushing, has also worked with Alliance Defending Freedom. Joan Larsen, thought to be a top contender, wrote in an article in 2004 that she thought homosexuality shouldn’t be decriminalized. 

Charles isn’t the only one worrying that LGBTQ+ gains at stake. Across the nation, queer people are debating fast-tracking major life changes, expecting that rights they now have could be stripped away. Trans and nonbinary people report trying to quickly access gender-confirming medical care out of fear that the Affordable Care Act will be struck down, and their insurance companies will stop covering transgender surgeries and hormones. There is a rush to put through legal name changes.

Erin Taylor, 24, and her girlfriend never talked about getting married before. The couple has been together for a year.

“I don’t want to super speed up the process,” said Taylor. “I want to be able to do it on my own time.”

For Taylor, she thought that looked like getting married in five years and maybe adopting kids after that. Ginsburg’s death, however, forced her to rethink the timeline.

“Five years from now, is this going to be possible in the same way?” she asked. “You can’t really know the answer.” 

On Wednesday, four of Charles’ Lambda colleagues laid out their concerns in a Facebook live event about what a 6-3 conservative Supreme Court could mean.

“There are many threats in the legal realm to the rights of LGBTQ people,” said Lambda Litigation Director Diana Flynn. “But perhaps the most eminent one is the assertion of religious objections to compliance with the civil rights laws.”

Most immediately, queer legal experts are eyeing Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, a case over whether Philadelphia rightfully terminated a foster care contract with Catholic Social Services after the agency refused to place kids in same-sex households.

Karen Loewy, senior counsel for Lambda Legal, stressed that the case has far-reaching implications. Exemptions for government contractors could mean that LGBTQ+ seniors lose access to safe housing and meal programs, she said.

“You’re really seeing the harm really across the lifespan from allowing religiously-affiliated government contractors to say, ‘Well, your civil rights laws don’t apply to me,’” Loewy argued.

Kenneth Upton, senior litigation counsel for Americans United for Separation of Church and State, said it’s cases like Fulton, where plaintiffs are seeking exemptions from discrimination law, that worry him. 

“We could go back to the time when in some states you could get married, in some states you could adopt children, in some states you couldn’t.”

Texas, he points out, has no statewide LGBTQ+ anti-discrimination protections. From repealing anti-sodomy laws to granting marriage equality laws, the state legislature has never passed a pro-LGBTQ+ measure. Queer people in the Lone Star State have gained the rights they have entirely through the courts. 

“Even if the Supreme Court were to undo everything, it doesn’t automatically fall back to where it was. It’s up to the states,” Upton said. “Would they reinstate sodomy laws in Texas? I don’t know that they would. Maybe enough things have changed. I’m not convinced that they would continue to let gay people get married.” 

Alphonso David, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the county’s largest LGBTQ+ organization, believes that marriage equality is settled law. But he also echoes the concerns from other advocates about protections against discrimination. 

“What I do see is the risk that the court could allow individuals on the guise of religious liberty to discriminate against gay couples, as they exercise their fundamental rights in marriage,” he said.

He believes religious exemptions to pro-equality laws could render them largely meaningless. Hospitals could have a right to deny queer spouses hospital visitation. Queer married couples could lose parenthood rights to non-biological children if they don’t adopt them. Essentially, he fears that marriage for LGBTQ+ people would be largely symbolic. 

Brad Polumbo, a gay conservative writer and journalist, thinks those fears are overblown. He points to the court’s historic LGBTQ+ ruling in June, in which a conservative-majority court voted 6-3 in favor of nondiscrimination workplace protections. 

“I think the extent to which conservative judges are hostile to LGBT rights is exaggerated and catastrophized,” he said. “If we want to talk about other issues outside of gay marriage, maybe there’s some more substantive action that could happen, and some of it could be bad or wrong,” he said, adding that he thinks a conservative court would uphold trans rights passed into law by Congress but fall short of doing so on their own. 

David Brown, legal director at the Transgender Legal Defense and Education Fund, is also optimistic, not just because they don’t see the court reversing itself.

“Most people’s access to health care, by and large, is not because of ACA,” they said, adding that most major companies’ health plans cover trans surgeries, and several states also mandate that coverage. “The impact would probably be the biggest on folks who lose coverage entirely.” 

A full repeal, they think, is unlikely in a pandemic. 

While LGBTQ+ legal experts caution against panicking, they are telling their clients now might be the time to tie up those legal loose ends. 

“Am I saying people need to rush to the courthouse and get married after they’ve gone on three dates over Zoom with someone? No, that’s not what I’m encouraging folks to do,” Charles said. “What I am saying is if you’re in a position to do those things, and you’ve been thinking it’s not necessary or you wouldn’t need those protections, I think there’s a good argument to be made that you might.” 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi pays her respects to Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as she lies in state in the U.S. Capitol on Friday, Sept. 25, 2020. Ginsburg died at the age of 87 on Sept. 18 and is the first women to lie in state at the Capitol.

Justice

Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s memorial marks a moment in history for women

Generations of women paid tribute to the justice, who was the first woman to lie in state in the U.S. Capitol.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram