Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Donate to our newsroom

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion

Texas ruling would allow abortion during dangerous pregnancy complications

The temporary injunction also would allow the procedure for fatal fetal anomalies and protects doctors from prosecution in such cases. But the state appealed the decision, blocking it from taking effect.

 

Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski are among the plaintiffs who sued Texas over its abortion law. (Montinique Monroe for 19th News)

Shefali Luthra

Reproductive Health Reporter

Published

2023-08-04 19:30
7:30
August 4, 2023
pm

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Your trusted source for contextualizing abortion news. Sign up for our daily newsletter.

A Texas judge ruled Friday that the the state cannot deny people access to abortion when facing dangerous pregnancy complications, including fatal fetal anomalies. But hours later, the state attorney general’s office appealed the decision to the Texas Supreme Court, blocking the temporary injunction from taking effect until that court has ruled.  

The injunction would allow doctors to exercise their own medical judgment about when patients need abortions to protect their lives or health. Though the state’s three different abortion bans nominally allow abortions when a patient’s life is in danger, doctors and other medical providers had previously said the language was not clear enough for them to act until the pregnant person’s condition had worsened to the point they could soon die. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Separately, the ruling also found that Texas’ six-week abortion ban, known as Senate Bill 8 and enforced through private citizen lawsuits, violates the state constitution. 

The state judge set a trial on the merits of the Texas abortion laws, scheduling that hearing for March 2024.

If enforced, the Texas injunction could have massive implications for people in the state who need abortions for wanted pregnancies that have become untenable. Texas is the largest state in the country to have banned almost all abortions. Still, the ruling would not affect the majority of people who seek abortions, who usually seek termination earlier on after discovering an unplanned pregnancy, and not because of physical complications.

  • More from The 19th
    Chairwoman Kay Granger (center) talks with Rep. Steve Womack on Capitol Hill.
  • House Republicans are baking abortion restrictions into spending bills — and avoiding public votes
  • Texas denied abortions to these women when their lives were in danger. Now they’re suing the state.
  • For years, Republican states wouldn’t pass diaper laws. The end of abortion protections changed that.

The case at hand, Zurawski v. Texas, is believed to be the first case since 1973 in which women have sued the state over being denied an abortion. The plaintiffs include more than a dozen women who were unable to get abortions in their state. All experienced complications with wanted pregnancies. Some traveled out of state for abortions. Amanda Zurawski, the lead plaintiff, was forced to wait until she developed sepsis to get an abortion in Texas. One woman, Samantha Casiano, was forced to have a child who doctors said had no chance of living — and who died within hours of being born. 

Casiano, one of the women who testified in Austin last month, vomited on the stand describing her experience. Zurawski’s infection closed one of her fallopian tubes, meaning she will face greater challenges in conceiving again and is now relying on in vitro fertilization to become pregnant. Multiple plaintiffs have also reported feeling afraid for their lives if they become pregnant again in the state of Texas.

The state of Texas has attempted to argue that any confusion over abortion exceptions is not the fault of the law itself, but instead the result of doctors being unwilling to make complex medical decisions. Lawyers for the state also argued that some of the women lacked standing to challenge the law in court, because they were not currently pregnant and seeking an abortion. 

Doctors across the country have reported uncertainty over whether they can provide abortion care even when necessary because of medical complications, including when cancer patients require chemotherapy — which must be paused while pregnant – or when their water breaks early in pregnancy. In such cases, the standard medical care would be abortion, but it is not always clear if those situations qualify under states’ various medical exceptions clauses.

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski pose for a portrait near the Texas State Capitol.
Texas denied abortions to these women when their lives were in danger. Now they’re suing the state.
People gather for an abortion rights rally at the federal courthouse in San Antonio
Texas woman asks judge to let her terminate pregnancy after lethal fetal diagnosis
Anna Zaragarian, Lauren Miller, Lauren Hall and Amanda Zurawski.
Texas will continue its ban on abortions in medical emergencies, state Supreme Court rules
Activists hold signs both for and against abortion.
The 19th Explains: What to know about Texas’ abortion law

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Our newsroom's Spring Member Drive is here!

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.