Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Donate to our newsroom

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion

Tensions run high outside Supreme Court as hundreds gather after Roe v. Wade draft opinion leak

Some anti-abortion activists celebrated plans to “dance on the grave” of Roe v. Wade, while abortion rights advocates feared for the future.

Crowds are seen protesting in front of the Supreme Court.
Abortion rights advocates demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court on May 3, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Dee Dwyer for The 19th)

By

Candice Norwood, Orion Rummler

Published

2022-05-03 23:02
11:02
May 3, 2022
pm

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Two stark realities were represented outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday morning: Abortion advocates stood somberly holding signs, their voices overtaken by the shouts of an adjacent group of anti-abortion activists chanting plans to “dance on the grave” of Roe v. Wade.

By Tuesday evening the dynamic had flipped: Most of the protesters outside of the Supreme Court were chanting in favor of Roe, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court decision granting a federal right to abortion. Hundreds of protesters rallied outside the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday, after many abortion rights advocates and anti-abortion activists had already stayed past midnight the previous night. 

Several moments underscored high tensions after Politico published a leaked opinion draft that would overturn Roe. The draft, written by Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, indicated that the court would overturn Roe completely. Chief Justice John Roberts verified the document’s authenticity Tuesday, but stressed it is not the final opinion of the court.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

For many court watchers, the contents of the leaked decision are not entirely surprising. Many have expected abortion rights to be scaled back in some capacity, if not completely. Still, multiple abortion rights demonstrators told The 19th that hearing the news Monday night hit them hard.

“In my lifetime, I’ve seen the passage of civil rights, voting rights and Roe v. Wade – basic fundamental protections for everyone around this country – getting slowly eroded and dismantled,” said Carol Joyner, 61, who lives in Washington, D.C., and joined the protests on Tuesday. 

  • More abortion coverage from The 19th
    A woman stands at the check-in window of an abortion clinic in Louisiana.
  • Abortion providers expected that Roe v. Wade could be overturned. But the leaked draft made it real.
  • Why didn’t Congress codify abortion rights?
  • Kamala Harris: ‘There is nothing hypothetical about this moment’ on abortion

Many of the anti-abortion activists, however, were visibily excited. “It was incredible,” Steve Corson, 65, of Arizona said about learning the news of the draft opinion. “It was like a miracle, and I jumped up and down and praised the Lord last night. And this morning I came here and I’m still celebrating because it’s gonna happen.”

One group, the Progressive Anti-Abortion Uprising, beat drums and danced as they celebrated what several described as a long awaited effort to strike down Roe. 

“We believe that providing adequate care to communities of color like social programs, places where they get affordable pregnancy care. Those are all really important. But we don’t think that any of our liberation comes at the expense of our children’s lives,” said group member Kristin Turner. 

Demonstrators hold signs that read "the system is sexist! fight for socialism," "bans off our bodies" and "my body, my choice" as they demonstrate in front of the Supreme Court.
Abortion rights advocates listen to speeches during protests in front of the Supreme Court on May 3, 2022 in Washington, D.C. (Dee Dwyer for The 19th)

Some of the crowd became more tense as the day continued, with face-to-face shouting when some anti-abortion demonstrators crossed the barrier between the two groups, each shouting through megaphones. Around 7 p.m., a small number of competing activists started shoving each other outside the Supreme Court following a shouting match — leading to at least one person falling to the ground. D.C. police officers on bicycles later formed a protective ring around anti-abortion protesters after they left the immediate Supreme Court grounds. 

Nicole Marikisohn, a 32-year-old abortion clinic escort who lives in Alexandria, Virginia, said that though she is distraught by the draft opinion, she is also concerned about misinformation around current abortion access care being spread. 

“Abortion access is still protected in all 50 states in this country right now in varying degrees,” she said. Nothing regarding abortion care will immediately change until the court hands down its decision. 

Michigan resident Katie Polik, 25, arrived in Washington, D.C., on Saturday for vacation. When she saw the news about the drafted opinion, Polik said she thought it was important to be present at the protests. Back in Michigan, a pre-Roe v. Wade abortion ban is still on the books, and Polik worries it will go into effect again if the Supreme Court officially overturns the federal standard set by the Roe ruling. 

“In a country where maternal mortality is so incredibly high, to not have access to health care that can ensure your safety is kind of wild and upsetting,” Polik said.

Since 2005, 13 states have passed “trigger bans,” designed to abolish abortion in those states if Roe is overturned. Four states, in addition to Michigan, have complete prohibitions on abortion that passed before 1973 that have never been repealed.

Several trans and LGBTQ+ people protesting in support of abortion on Tuesday said they are worried that the draft ruling would directly harm their rights.  The opinion argues that landmark LGBTQ+ cases cannot be used to support Roe, including cases such as Lawrence v. Texas, which ruled that gay sex is not a crime, and Obergefell v. Hodges, which made marriage equality the law of the land.

Sign up for more news and context delivered to your inbox, daily

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Preview of the daily newsletter from The 19th

The opinion says the appeal “to a broader right to autonomy” in cases like Lawrence v. Texas and Obergefell v. Hodges is not comparable to the issue of abortion, although Alito adds that dismissing such a link is not meant to undermine those cases. The opinion also pokes holes in protections offered by the 14th Amendment’s due process and equal protection clauses, essential pillars of current legal battles over gender-affirming care for transgender youth.

Herb Geraghty, executive director of anti-abortion group Rehumanize International, said that though he advocates for trans and LGBTQ+ rights — especially as a bisexual and nonbinary person — he believes the current draft opinion would narrowly impact abortion access and not affect LGBTQ+ rights. 

“I am worried about any threats to LGBTQ rights, potential and hypothetical, that could arise as a result of any ruling from the Supreme Court. But again, ultimately, what we’re talking about is an extreme act of violence against a living human being,” he said. 

For others looking to a future without Roe, they have already witnessed the challenges people have faced without it. Adriane Fugh-Berman, 63, said she fears such a future would lead to more harm as people seek out less safe alternatives.

“You can’t stop abortion, you can only stop safe, legal abortion,” she said.

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

A woman holds a lit candle in the middle of a crowd of abortion rights activists.
People are rallying this weekend for abortion rights. What comes next?
A person yells into a megaphone, as other demonstrators join in, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court
What we know about the Supreme Court draft opinion — and what it could mean for abortion access
The first post-Roe March for Life showed anti-abortion activists are far from done
93 days: The summer America lost Roe v. Wade

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Our newsroom's Spring Member Drive is here!

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.