Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A person yells into a megaphone, as other demonstrators join in, in front of the U.S. Supreme Court
Activists rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court on May 2, 2022 in Washington, DC. (Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Abortion

What we know about the Supreme Court draft opinion — and what it could mean for abortion access

If Roe is overturned, the level of abortion access — or if the procedure is legal at all — would be left to the states.

By

Shefali Luthra, Abby Johnston, Terri Rupar

Published

2022-05-02 20:55
8:55
May 2, 2022
pm

Updated

2022-05-05 13:06:14.000000
America/New_York

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

This developing story is being updated.

On Monday night, Politico reported that Roe v. Wade — the 1973 decision that enshrined federal abortion protections — will be overturned, according to an initial draft authored by Justice Samuel Alito. The decision, related to Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, was expected this summer. Politico obtained an early draft circulated among the court.

With Roe overturned, the level of abortion access — or even if the procedure is legal at all — will be left to the states. For months, in anticipation of the decision being overturned or weakened by the Supreme Court, Republican-led states have been passing new abortion restrictions that clearly violated the court precedent. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Here is what we know about the decision and what abortion access will look like in key states. 

What do we know about what the Supreme Court will do — and when?

Alito’s draft opinion obtained by Politico was clear in its interpretation: “We hold that Roe and [Planned Parenthood v.] Casey must be overruled.”

However, it is unclear if this is what the final decision, expected to be released this summer, will say.

  • Read Next:
  • Read Next: Impacts of leaked Supreme Court draft decision could have a ‘chilling effect’ on abortion access

So what happens if the Supreme Court rules like this? 

If the Supreme Court knocks down Roe v. Wade, the legality of abortion will be left up to the states, meaning abortion access is completely dependent on where a person lives. For months, Republican-led states have been passing abortion restrictions that clearly violated Roe v. Wade in anticipation of the decision.

Roe protected the right to an abortion up until fetal viability. Now, if Roe is overturned, states will be able to outlaw abortion at any point in a pregnancy — or completely.

“It is time to heed the Constitution and return the issue of abortion to the people’s elected representatives,” Alito wrote in the draft opinion.

  • Read Next:
  • Read Next: ‘You never forget it’: These are the stories of life before Roe v. Wade transformed America

Is abortion still protected in the United States?

The draft opinion was obtained by Politico, but has not been handed down. As of yet, the Supreme Court has not overturned Roe v. Wade, which ensures that abortion is protected to the point of fetal viability. Nothing will immediately change until the court hands down its decision.

What case is this related to?

In December, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the case Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization over a Mississippi law that banned abortion after 15 weeks, which violated the fetal viability standard.

What are the two Supreme Court cases that currently determine abortion rights?

Roe v. Wade, decided in 1973, held that the Constitution guaranteed a right to an abortion until a fetus could live independently outside the womb, a limit that has been put at about 22 to 24 weeks of pregnancy. In 1992, the high court ruled in Planned Parenthood v. Casey that states could restrict access as long as they did not impose an “undue burden” on people looking to end a pregnancy.

Can the Supreme Court undo those previous decisions?

Generally courts rely on previous decisions, a principle known as “stare decisis.” But the Supreme Court can and in some cases has overturned its own precedents, something Alito points to in the draft decision. “A precedent of this Court is subject to the usual principles of stare decisis under which adherence to precedent is the norm but not an inexorable command,” the draft decision states. In it, Alito points to the overturning of the court’s decision in Plessy v. Ferguson, when it ruled in favor of racial segregation, later reversed in Brown v. Board of Education. 

What is a draft decision, and what do we know about how it leaked out?

Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday criticized the leak of the draft decision but confirmed its authenticity. He emphasized that it is not “the final position” of the court or any of the justices. 

After the justices hear oral arguments in a case — as they did with Dobbs in December —  they vote on how to rule. The most senior justice in the majority assigns a justice to write the opinion, but that decision can go through various drafts, and justices can change their votes. A decision is not final until it’s released. Politico reported that the draft it obtained is from February. 

We don’t know how the draft leaked out, but we do know that leaks this big from the court are rare. In his statement confirming the authenticity of the draft, Roberts called it “a singular and egregious breach” and said he was ordering an investigation by the marshal of the court. 

What are states doing to restrict abortion?

Since 2005, 13 states have passed “trigger bans,” designed to abolish abortion in those states if Roe is overturned. In Arkansas, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Utah and Wyoming, steps must be taken by the attorney general or other officials before those bans would go into effect. In Kentucky, Louisiana and South Dakota, the bans would appear to take effect immediately. And in Idaho, Tennessee and Texas, they appear to be set to take effect 30 days after Roe is struck down.  

Five states without trigger bans have complete prohibitions on abortion that passed before 1973 and have never been repealed.

States have been pushing abortion restrictions for months in anticipation of Roe being struck down, putting unprecedented limits on access to the procedure. Some are modeled on the law that went into effect in September in Texas that allows civil lawsuits against anyone who “aids and abets” someone getting an abortion. Texas’ law permits such suits after six weeks of pregnancy, before many people know they are pregnant.

Here are some of the notable passages The 19th has been following:

Kentucky: In April, Kentucky passed a law that put so many restrictions on abortion that clinics had to stop providing the procedure. A federal judge has blocked that law. 

Mississippi: This state is at the heart of the Supreme Court's decision on Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization. The 15-week ban passed by the legislature and signed into law was subsequently blocked by the courts, unable to go into effect pending a Supreme Court decision.

Oklahoma: Oklahoma passed a similar law to Texas' — and also one that would ban virtually all abortions, with an exception if the pregnant person’s life were in immediate danger; pregnancy resulting from rape or incest is an exception only if it has been reported to law enforcement.

  • Read Next:
  • Read Next: Why so many abortion restrictions are working their way through state legislatures now

What is happening in Democrat-led states?

Some states with Democrat-led legislatures have been moving to shore up abortion access, codifying protections and in some cases even providing new funds for those seeking or providing the procedure. But some are worried that they’re not prepared for a potential influx of people from other states. 

What do we know about medication abortion and the role it could play?

We know that in 2020, the majority of abortions happened via medication. The two-pill medication abortion option has been approved for people up until their 10th week of pregnancy, and involves a patient taking mifepristone and then, 24 to 48 hours later, misoprostol. 

The federal government has moved to make it easier for people to get the pills, allowing them to be dispensed via telemedicine. This could mean people in states with abortion bans could still receive the pills, but the legality is still unclear.

What can Congress do, or what have they done? 

In September, the U.S. House passed the Women’s Health Protection Act, which would prohibit states from passing most abortion restrictions. The legislation was filibustered in the Senate in February and failed to advance. Since Roe was deciding 49 years ago, Congress has attempted at times to pass legislation that would either codify or overturn Roe, but it has never succeeded.

  • Read Next:
  • Read Next: Why didn’t Congress codify abortion rights?

Who is on the Supreme Court?

Nine justices sit on the Supreme Court. Stephen Breyer, who plans to retire this summer and will be replaced by Ketanji Brown Jackson, was nominated by President Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and has been on the court since 1994. The other justices, in order of seniority on the court, are: 

  • John Roberts, the chief justice, nominated by President George W. Bush, a Republican, in 2005
  • Clarence Thomas, nominated by President George H.W. Bush, a Republican, in 1991
  • Samuel Alito, nominated by George W. Bush in 2005 and joined the court in 2006
  • Sonia Sotomayor, nominated by President Barack Obama, a Democrat, in 2009
  • Elena Kagan, nominated by Obama in 2010
  • Neil Gorsuch, nominated by President Donald Trump, a Republican, in 2017
  • Brett Kavanaugh, nominated by Trump in 2018
  • Amy Coney Barrett, nominated by Trump in 2020

Politico reported that the justices who were siding with Alito are Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Coney Barrett.

What has President Joe Biden said? 

Biden released a statement Tuesday morning cautioning that the draft may not be the final decision. The Supreme Court has not released a statement disputing the accuracy of the draft, but drafts do not always fully reflect what a final opinion will say. 

The president in the statement said “a woman’s right to choose is fundamental” and that “basic fairness and the stability of our law demand that it not be overturned.” Biden said that the administration has been preparing a response to efforts to restrict abortion rights and “will be ready when any ruling is issued.” 

In the statement, Biden used the word “abortion,” something abortion rights advocates have been encouraging the president to do. He used it again when speaking to reporters, saying the ruling would be “radical” if the decision holds and that it would shift how laws could be made that affect people’s decisions, including “who you marry, whether or not you decide to conceive a child or not, whether or not you can have an aboriton.”

Biden also referred to the midterm elections, saying: “It will fall on voters to elect pro-choice officials this November.  At the federal level, we will need more pro-choice Senators and a pro-choice majority in the House to adopt legislation that codifies Roe, which I will work to pass and sign into law.”

Vice President Kamala Harris spoke Tuesday night at the annual gala for Emily’s List, which supports Democratic women who back abortion rights, and called on her audience to fight for those rights, saying there is “nothing hypothetical about this moment.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

A protesters speaks into a megaphone in the foreground. In the background, people hold signs that read

Abortion

Employees of one of the biggest reproductive health research orgs are unionizing at a pivotal moment in the abortion rights movement

The push comes after months of low morale at the institute — and just as the Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling that could weaken or overturn Roe v. Wade

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram