Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
      • U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik wants to elect more Republican women into office

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 13
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
      • Meet J. Michelle Childs, South Carolina judge and possible Supreme Court contender

        Candice Norwood · February 18
      • ‘The bench is loaded’: A record number of Latinas are running for governor

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 11
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: The governor’s races we’re watching in 2022

        Barbara Rodriguez · May 3
      • The 19th Explains: What to know about Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing

        Candice Norwood, Terri Rupar · March 21
      • The 19th Explains: Colleges are dropping the SAT in admissions. That’s a good thing for most girls.

        Nadra Nittle · March 3
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
      • Girls are being socialized to lose political ambition — and it starts younger than we realized

        Barbara Rodriguez · September 23
      • Kathy Hochul’s rise in New York spotlights the barriers to women becoming governors

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 23
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
      • LGBTQ+ seniors fear having to go back in closet for the care they need

        Sara Luterman · October 12
      • The pandemic continues to strain nursing homes. What happens if a lot of them close?

        Mariel Padilla · September 9
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Donate to get our member newsletter

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion rights advocates hold signs that read
Abortion rights advocates hold signs during a Los Angeles protest in April 2022. (Jae C. Hong/AP)

Abortion

Blue states have passed laws to shore up abortion access, but it may not be enough to address potential surge

Several Democratic-led statehouses have taken steps in recent months to codify abortion protections, but  few have done anything to increase access in anticipation of out-of-state patients.

By

Shefali Luthra, Barbara Rodriguez

Published

2022-05-03 17:07
5:07
May 3, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Even as Republican-led states have passed an onslaught of abortion restrictions in recent years, some Democrat-controlled legislatures have gone in the opposite direction, working to codify protections and, in a few cases, even increase access.

A leaked draft decision that shows the Supreme Court voted to overturn Roe v. Wade prompted several Democratic governors and state lawmakers to highlight those efforts. But while they may have shored up access in their states, many of those recent actions do not address a projected surge of people who will travel from other states to access an abortion. And with many part-time legislatures done for the year, time may have run out for further action.

Spurred by the looming Supreme Court decision, some states took steps to codify the protections established by Roe, which in 1973 held that the U.S. Constitution guaranteed a right to an abortion. Colorado, New Jersey and Washington passed such laws this year, meaning 16 states and the District of Columbia have statutory abortion rights protections. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

But in states where abortion isn’t expected to be heavily or almost completely restricted if Roe is overturned, clinics are worried about whether they have the capacity to provide abortions for everyone who may seek them. There have been few legislatures this year that have expanded the capacity to provide abortions, even as researchers estimate the number of patients seeking to travel to their clinics from out of state could increase by millions. 

Policy analysts note that for many patients who will live in newly restrictive states — where legislatures have passed bans on abortions after six weeks or 15 weeks or even all-but-total bans, plus restrictions on medication abortion — the cost of traveling for an abortion will come to hundreds if not thousands of dollars. 

A handful of states are starting to push bills that would address those logistical and financial hurdles. But abortion policy experts told The 19th that these laws are few and far between — and still in their early stages.

“We’re at the very beginning of this. It’s just occurring to blue states that people are going to travel from out of state and maybe something should be done,” said Mary Ziegler, an abortion law expert at Florida State University. “No one is really getting into it in any greater kinds of depths.”

In Illinois — which is expected to be a destination for many people seeking out-of-state abortions — lawmakers last year passed legislation that ended a requirement that parents be notified when a minor seeks an abortion. That follows a 2019 law that codified abortion rights in the state. 

But those changes will do little to address the surge of people likely to come there, said David Cohen, a law professor at Drexel University in Philadelphia who has studied the legal impact of abortion restrictions across state borders. Nothing else is likely to pass this year: Lawmakers wrapped their session last month.

“Illinois is surrounded by states where abortion is going to be banned. Illinois is ground zero for needing protections for providers,” he said. “And their session is over, barring an emergency.”

At a news conference Tuesday, in the wake of the leaked Supreme Court draft, Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker indicated Illinois would be open to all pregnant people seeking abortions.

“Illinois is a beacon of hope in an increasingly dark world because we will fight like hell, not just for the women of Illinois, but for every person in our state and every person across the nation who believes not in limiting civil rights and human rights, but in expanding them,” he said, according to The Chicago Sun-Times.

  • More abortion coverage from The 19th
    Anti-abortion rights demonstrators and clinic escorts stand in front of the EMW Women's Surgical Center.
  • Impacts of leaked Supreme Court draft decision could have a ‘chilling effect’ on abortion access
  • What we know about the Supreme Court draft opinion — and what it could mean for abortion access
  • ‘You never forget it’: These are the stories of life before Roe v. Wade transformed America

Some states have taken more comprehensive action. In California, the legislature has passed a law eliminating co-pays from the California’s Medicaid abortion benefit. California is among the small group of states where Medicaid, which insures low-income people, actually covers abortions. Its Planned Parenthood clinics are working to hire more staff. 

And lawmakers in Sacramento are pushing more bills, including one that would, among other changes, create a state abortion fund that would help people pay for abortions and associated travel costs, including those from out of state. Another bill would help support clinics that provide abortions for people without insurance that covers it. Both pieces of legislation are still in committee, but the governor has indicated he supports passing laws that would turn California into an “abortion sanctuary.”

On Monday, California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom announced his support for adding abortion protections to the state constitution. Newsom is up for reelection this year.

“We know we can’t trust the Supreme Court to protect reproductive rights, so California will build a firewall around this right in our state constitution,” he said as part of a statement co-signed by legislative leaders. 

An anti-abortion activist kneels on the street in prayer in front of Planned Parenthood - Manhattan Health Center while abortion rights activists block the clinic using white umbrellas.
Anti-abortion activists demonstrate in front of Planned Parenthood – Manhattan Health Center, while abortion rights activists block the clinic with umbrellas in New York City in December 2021. (YUKI IWAMURA/AFP/Getty Images)

Many statehouses, like Illinois’, are part-time and done with their formal legislative sessions for the year. But New York, one of the states with robust abortion protections, still has a few weeks of session left. Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, a Democratic assemblymember there, said she has filed a bill that would create a mechanism for health providers and organizations to seek additional money to address gaps in their funding if they face increased demand for abortion access. She did not have an estimate yet on potential financing because lawmakers have already passed the upcoming state budget.

“We’ll have to sort of navigate how to move this legislation forward and what the dollar amount looks like,” she said. “Again, it was a concept we were working on, and now, it was just urgent to get it moving.”

Elizabeth Nash, who tracks abortion policy at the nonpartisan Guttmacher Institute, said some states may take additional action now that the future end of Roe has become more crystalized. (On Tuesday, Chief Justice John Roberts confirmed the authenticity of the draft but added it doesn’t represent the higher court’s final ruling in the case.)

“I’m just wondering if this is sort of a breakthrough moment for progressive states to say, ‘Oh, OK, now we’ll put some money toward this,” she said.

Other states have added concrete budget numbers to logistics. Oregon’s legislature voted to allot $15 million to an abortion fund intended to help people traveling in from other states. 

Those are meaningful investments, said Cohen of Drexel University.

“If Roe is overturned, the problems that are going to be created — a lot of them can be solved by money,” he said. “Not all. But a lot can.”

Late last month, Connecticut legislators approved a bill that would create legal protections for out-of-state people seeking abortions. The provisions would ensure that another state’s abortion restrictions — including penalties against someone who performed or facilitated an abortion — would not be enforceable in Connecticut. The state’s governor has indicated he will sign the legislation.

Connecticut’s legislation addresses new restrictions passed in red states that attempt to punish people who cross state lines to access an abortion. But it does not include protections for mailing abortion-inducing medication to people in states where it has been outlawed, though the legal outlines of such a prosecution are unclear. And the bill’s supporters acknowledge that few people are expected to travel to Connecticut for abortions compared with other states that might be closer. Few of its neighbors have passed restrictions on the procedure, and other blue-leaning states are closer to those expected to ban abortion.

The Connecticut bill would also expand who can perform abortion services in the state to include advanced practice registered nurses, physician assistants and nurse-midwives.

A newsletter you can relate to

Storytelling that represents you, delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Other states are considering similar expansions so that more medical providers can perform abortion services. In Maryland, lawmakers put $3.5 million annually toward a fund that will train more medical providers in performing abortions, potentially addressing capacity issues.

Maryland Republican Gov. Larry Hogan vetoed the creation of the fund, but Democrats in the legislature had enough votes to override it. The mandated fund will be in effect in 2023. While lawmakers set aside immediate money for the budget year that begins in July, it’s unclear if Hogan will veto that money.

Maryland Del. Ariana Kelly was a lead sponsor of the bill. She said that the state had rarely touched abortion policy because abortion protections had been codified decades ago but that the looming Roe decision forced lawmakers to take action. The legislation expands the types of medical professionals who can perform an abortion and expands insurance coverage for abortion services. 

“We knew that we were going to see people coming from out of state. We saw what happened with Texas. We saw the increased wait times in those adjacent states to Texas,” she said.

Gonzalez-Rojas in New York said the state could see an influx of out-of-state travel for abortion access. She said it’s important that the state be ready to address that need.

“We want to do that without stigma, without shame and with dignity and care and compassion, given what we’re facing as a nation.” she said.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Building stronger together.

A new model for nonprofit journalism: For our readers. For our team. For our community.

Become a member

Sign up for our newsletter

Up Next

Anti-abortion rights demonstrators and clinic escorts stand in front of the EMW Women's Surgical Center.

Abortion

Impacts of leaked Supreme Court draft decision could have a ‘chilling effect’ on abortion access

Abortion clinics have already been working to try to publicize information about what is currently legal — as well as about the impending Dobbs decision.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram