Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A banner that reads
A banner hangs on the side of the Planned Parenthood of St. Louis building. (Photo by Robert Cohen/St. Louis Post-Dispatch/Tribune News Service/Getty Images)

Abortion

Abortion bans could add hundreds of miles of travel to those seeking the procedures, analysis shows

If the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade, just 13 states could become destinations for people from more than 20 others that would be expected to restrict abortions.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2021-10-28 07:00
7:00
October 28, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Thirteen states are poised to become the nation’s abortion havens if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade and gives states the power to ban access to the procedure, according to a new analysis by the nonpartisan Guttmacher Institute. 

The court is set to hear two major cases addressing national abortion protections, guaranteed by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade, which found that the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right to an abortion up until a fetus can live independently outside the womb. The first, with oral arguments scheduled for November 1, looks at a six-week ban from Texas. The second, scheduled for December 1, looks at a 15-week ban from Mississippi. 

It’s not clear how or when the court will rule. Much depends on the nuances of any eventual decision. But conservatives hold a 6-3 majority on the court, and if they uphold one of the laws, it could lead to the elimination of Roe v. Wade’s abortion rights guarantee, meaning states are free to restrict or even ban access to the procedure altogether.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

There are many permutations for how the court could rule. It could uphold the Mississippi ban but block Texas’ law. It could hold that states are allowed to block abortions at 15 weeks, but not earlier. Or it could issue a ruling that opens the door to states blocking abortions at six weeks, or even earlier. 

Depending on the details of any ruling, people seeking abortions could have to travel hundreds of miles each way to end a pregnancy, the Guttmacher paper shows, adding to the burden of time and money and making abortions further out of reach for many people who are already struggling to afford them. If states interpret the court’s ruling as allowing all levels of bans on abortion, the impact would be particularly severe for those who live in one of the 21 states that already have laws in place to ban most abortions were Roe v. Wade to be overturned.

Some of those 21 states have what is called a “trigger law,” which would theoretically ban all abortions if the Supreme Court moves to overturn Roe v. Wade — though such a law taking effect is unprecedented, and legal scholars are divided over how this would actually work. Many also have passed laws bans banning abortion after six weeks of pregnancy. Most of those six-week bans are currently blocked by courts; Texas is the only one whose six-week abortion ban is being actively enforced, in large part because of its unique mechanism. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

An additional five states — Florida, Indiana, Nebraska, Montana and Wyoming — do not currently have laws that would end abortion access, but, based on recent political activity, appear likely to enact such restrictions if Roe v. Wade is overturned, the paper suggests. 

“You’re looking at the South, the Plains, the Midwest,” said Elizabeth Nash, who analyzes state policy for the institute. “We’re looking at a wide swath of the country with the real serious potential to ban abortion.”

Still, the impact could be vast. More than 36 million women of “reproductive age” — defined as ages 15 through 49, per the World Health Organization – live in those 26 states. 

It’s not fully clear if all states on the list would necessarily enact new abortion restrictions. Florida, for instance, is on the list in large part because one of its legislators introduced a six-week abortion ban inspired by the Texas law, which outsources enforcement to private individuals via civil lawsuits —- a provision that the Supreme Court has cited in declining to block it. But Florida’s government has historically been hostile to abortion restrictions — this past year, state lawmakers tried and failed to pass a law that would have banned abortion after 20 weeks of pregnancy. 

  • More from The 19th
  • One year in, Justice Amy Coney Barrett has energized Supreme Court’s rightward turn
  • Pregnant undocumented minors, many of them rape survivors, no longer have access to abortions in Texas

California, Colorado, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Washington and Virginia are listed as the 13 “destination states” — places that do not have abortion bans on the books and are not likely to immediately pass them, and that are closest to states that would likely ban abortion access if Roe v. Wade is overturned. 

And in two of those states — Kansas and North Carolina – that status is tenuous. Both currently have Democratic governors who have blocked the state legislatures’ efforts to enact abortion restrictions. But Kansas’ governor will face reelection in 2022 and North Carolina will face an open gubernatorial election in 2024. Republican victories could open up both states to passing stricter abortion restrictions. 

The Guttmacher paper models how far people would have to travel and to where under three different scenarios. The first analyzes the impact if all 26 states banned abortion after 20 weeks. The second analyzes what would happen if all those states passed a 15-week ban, following in Mississippi’s footsteps. 

Both of those cases would affect a far smaller number of people than either a six-week or total ban; currently, most people seek abortions before 13 weeks. But for those people, the loss of access could be particularly meaningful. Often, people seeking abortions later in pregnancy have faced larger barriers in getting together the money and time for the procedure or have discovered health concerns later in the pregnancy.

The third scenario from Guttmaacher imagines all 26 states banning abortion access entirely. 

If, for instance, all 26 of the states on Guttmacher’s list banned abortion, a handful — California, Illinois, Kansas,  New Mexico and Pennsylvania — would absorb much of the shock, the analysis suggests. For 8.9 million people, Illinois would be the closest state with legal abortion access. Patients could theoretically come from as far as Louisiana.

“What does that mean to attempt to get people to abortion care when they’re potentially traversing three or four states at a time and going to be away from home for days?” Nash said. “We’re talking about millions of people in that situation.”

Currently, a medication abortion typically costs at least $550 — but depending on the state and stage of pregnancy, it can come out to much more. Days of lodging, car gas, plane tickets or child care add on to those expenses. Traveling three or four states instead of one, Nash suggested, means that the procedure will be relatively unaffordable not only for low-income people but also for many middle-class Americans. Most people who seek abortions already have at least one child, per data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In Texas, whose six-week ban has largely eliminated abortion access, the implications are already emerging. Texans seeking abortions — and who have the time, money and means to travel — are flooding clinics in states such as Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arkansas. In Oklahoma, clinics are so overwhelmed that many people who live in the state can’t get appointments. They’re turning to abortion providers in Kansas.

“If states banned abortion tomorrow, these clinics would be facing a very difficult time to absorb the capacity,” Nash said.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

A view of the U.S. Supreme Court under a cloudy sky.

Abortion

Supreme Court to hear two challenges to Texas abortion law on November 1

In the interim, the law — which has effectively ended access to abortion in Texas — will remain in effect

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram