Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Several progressive organizations sent a letter criticizing decisions made by Attorney General Merrick Garland about which cases the Department of Justice has continued to pursue. (PHOTO BY ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES)

Justice

Progressive groups criticize DOJ for defending Trump defamation case related to sexual assault allegation

A letter to Biden cites Merrick Garland decision to continue representing former president in defamation lawsuit brought by E. Jean Carroll.

Amanda Becker

Washington Correspondent

Amanda Becker portrait

Published

2021-07-08 17:00
5:00
July 8, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

A group of progressive organizations told President Joe Biden this week that they believe that his Justice Department is continuing to support “anti-democratic” precedents set during Donald Trump’s administration, citing its continued defense of the former president in a defamation lawsuit brought by an author who says Trump sexually assaulted her. 

“Survivors of sexual assault were hurt to learn that the Department of Justice chose to continue to defend Donald Trump in E. Jean Carroll’s defamation suit against the former president,” the groups wrote in a letter, which was addressed to Biden, as well as Attorney General Merrick Garland, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco, White House Chief of Staff Ron Klain and White House Counsel Dana Remus. 

“Unfortunately, this is but one example of many in which Merrick Garland’s Justice Department has maintained flawed legal positions of the Trump administration which contravene not only the administration’s goals, but basic norms of American democracy,” the groups added in the letter that was reviewed by The 19th. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Signatories were the open-government group Demand Progress Education Fund, Climate Hawks Vote, the justice-system focused People’s Parity Project, the Latinx advocacy group Presente.org, the human rights group Project Blueprint, the women’s advocacy organization UltraViolet and the Revolving Door Project, a good governance group. 

“The Justice Department must immediately change course or allow for new leadership that will act in a manner consistent with the administration’s stated values,” they wrote to Biden in a letter that cited Garland by name multiple times.

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. 

The Department of Justice (DOJ) defends the laws, policies and officials of the federal government when they are challenged in court. New administrations will often step in and continue an departing administration’s legal defense in a case for both continuity and to avoid having the country’s top law enforcement agency seem overly politicized. Sometimes, that can put presidents in politically fraught positions. President Barack Obama’s Justice Department, for example, for several years continued representing Bush administration officials whom a terrorism suspect had accused of authorizing torture. 

But when Garland’s Justice Department last month moved ahead in its defense of Trump in the defamation lawsuit brought by Carroll it was noteworthy because it involved the former president himself, and there were already questions about whether the department should be defending a claim made by an elected official that related to their life as a private citizen. 

Carroll’s lawsuit follows a 2019 book in which she says Trump assaulted her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the 1990s. Trump said the allegation was not true, that they’d never met, that Carroll was “not my type,” and that she made the assault allegation in order to sell books. Carroll sued for defamation. 

A White House spokesperson told CNN that the DOJ did not consult President Biden before filing the brief. 

Last year, Attorney General William Barr made the unusual request to make the United States the defendant in Carroll’s defamation lawsuit instead of Trump, arguing his remarks were made as part of his official duties as president, and the government should therefore assume his defense. When the court agreed, it was seen as an additional hurdle for Carroll’s case to clear, since federal law protects employees of the federal government from defamation claims related to comments made during their official duties unless they are made with “actual malice.”

If the court concludes in Carroll’s case that Trump is protected by the statute, it could have implications for other pending legal matters, including several related to his remarks ahead of the January insurrection at the U.S. Capitol. 

The groups that sent the letter said they believed “what is driving Garland’s decision-making is an attempt to maintain the appearance that the DOJ is independent and remains consistent across administrations” but that it “makes no sense” given that Biden “made clear on the campaign trail, Trump treated the Department as his personal legal defense firm.”

The groups said under Garland’s leadership, the Justice Department also has attempted to shield former Trump officials such as Education Secretary Betsy DeVos from testifying; is continuing to seize land via eminent domain for Trump’s proposed border wall; and last month said it could and would defend a religious exemption to federal civil rights law that allows religious schools to accept federal money even if they discriminate against LGBTQ+ students. 

“Attorney General Merrick Garland is treating the Trump presidency as if it were business as usual. In reality, it was deeply anti-democratic, consistently undermining accountability and the rule of law,” the groups wrote. 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

A person walks by an empty massage parlor.

Education

Study finds evidence of sex trafficking in trade schools

Researchers identified at least 18 schools across five states that state certification boards suspected of forcing their students into the sex industry.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram