Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Donate to our newsroom

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

LGBTQ+

In Texas, parents’ rights don’t extend to gender-affirming care, state Supreme Court says

The Texas Supreme Court ruled that parents only have the right to seek medical treatments for their children “that are legally available."

People march to the Texas State Capitol during a Queer March demonstration.
People march to the Texas State Capitol during a Queer March demonstration on April 15, 2023 in Austin, Texas. People from across Texas rallied together in protest against a slew of anti-LGBTQIA+ and drag bills being proposed among legislators. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

Orion Rummler

LGBTQ+ Reporter

Published

2024-06-28 14:17
2:17
June 28, 2024
pm

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

The Texas Supreme Court found that parents in the state do not have the constitutional right to seek gender-affirming care for their children. 

The court on Friday upheld the state’s ban on gender-affirming care for transgender youth in a ruling that pushed the state’s interpretation of parental rights into a more limited scope when it comes to medical decision-making. Texas parents are guaranteed the right to raise their children without political interference — a right that includes decisions on medical care — but the court deemed restrictions on gender-affirming care to be a permissible exception. 

“Fit parents have a fundamental interest in directing the care, custody, and control of their children free from government interference. But we have never defined the source or precise scope of this interest,” the court’s ruling read. “Our precedents make clear that this interest is not absolute.” 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The court said using gender-affirming care to treat gender dysphoria is a nascent form of medicine, a finding at odds with the actual history of gender-affirming medical care. It also pointed out that Texas has the right to regulate the practice of medicine within its borders. 

Texas’ gender-affirming care ban had already gone into effect last September when the state Supreme Court denied plaintiffs’ request for emergency relief. The law blocks the provision of hormone therapy and puberty blockers to minors and mandates that medical professionals will have their licenses revoked if they provide trans adolescent patients with gender-affirming care. 

  • Previous coverage
    Isabella Morningstar talks with Marcus Anthony at Thrive Youth Center.
  • Texas politics leave transgender foster youth isolated — during and after life in state care
  • Texas Supreme Court to hear legal challenge to ban on gender-affirming care for kids
  • The 19th Explains: Everything you need to know about gender-affirming care

The ACLU, alongside national LGBTQ+ legal groups including Lambda Legal and the Transgender Law Center, sued the state over its gender-affirming care ban last summer on behalf of families and health care workers. They accused Texas of violating the state constitution, which guarantees the right to parental autonomy, arguing that the law discriminates against parents who are exercising a fundamental right to make decisions about the care and custody of their child.

As The 19th previously reported, at least one of the families in the lawsuit had split up in order to secure medical care for their trans child; the mom temporarily moved with her two children and the dad stayed in Texas for his job. 

Parental authority is not a constitutionally mandated absolute, the Texas Supreme Court said in its ruling on Friday. According to the court, the state’s law banning gender-affirming care for trans youth “does not sever parents’ control or autonomy to make medical decisions for their children” or displace parents’ role as the ultimate decision maker for their children. 

“The law merely restricts the availability of new treatments with which medical providers may treat children diagnosed with a newly defined medical condition, gender dysphoria,” the court’s ruling reads. However, gender dysphoria — the intense sense of discomfort or anxiety felt when one’s physical gender is out of sync with their gender identity — is not a new medical condition. The first formal studies and research into gender dysphoria were conducted in Germany in 1920, while specialized health care for transgender adolescents began in the 1980s, according to The World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). 

In its ruling, the Texas Supreme Court said that parents only have the right to seek medical treatments for their children “that are legally available,” and that parental rights “at times give way to other competing interests such as the interest in protecting children from harm.” 

Sign up for more news and context delivered to your inbox, daily

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Preview of the daily newsletter from The 19th

Although the new state Supreme Court ruling doesn’t change the reality on the ground for trans youth and their families, it relies on a limited interpretation of parental rights at a time when states across the country have cited parental rights as reason to curtail LGBTQ+ topics in schools, and to limit support for trans students. 

LGBTQ+ advocates and legal experts denounced the court’s ruling on Friday. Karen Loewy, senior counsel and director of constitutional law practice at Lambda Legal, said that it would be “impossible to overstate the devastating impact of this cruel and arbitrary ruling” on Texas transgender youth and their families.

“Instead of leaving medical decisions concerning minor children where they belong, with their parents and their doctors, the court here has elected to let politicians — in blatant disregard for the overwhelming medical consensus — determine the allowed course of treatment, threatening the health and the very lives of Texas transgender youth,” Loewy said in a statement.

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

‘This is a make or break moment’: Tennessee families ask Supreme Court to take on gender-affirming care
A person chants at the Texas State Capitol during a Queer March demonstration in Austin.
Anti-LGBTQ+ laws are being blocked in federal courts across the country
A pride flag is seen in front of the White House.
White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors
Drag artist Vidalia Anne Gentry raises her fist as she speaks during a news conference in front of the Tennessee Capitol.
Tennessee governor signs laws targeting drag shows and banning health care for transgender youths

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Our newsroom's Spring Member Drive is here!

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.