Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • The full PUMP Act is now in effect. Here’s what it does for lactating parents.

        Chabeli Carrazana · April 28
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • This Delaware candidate could be the first transgender member of Congress

        Orion Rummler · June 26
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What are 'late-term abortions' — and why are politicians talking about them? 

        Mel Leonor Barclay, Shefali Luthra · August 21
      • The 19th Explains: Why child marriage is still legal in 80% of U.S. states

        Mariel Padilla · July 5
      • The 19th Explains: The Supreme Court’s decision in the LGBTQ+ 303 Creative case

        Kate Sosin · June 30
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      The State of Our Nation

      • States passing abortion bans reflect what only a small minority of their constituents actually want

        Jasmine Mithani · October 24
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Voting organizers are breathing ‘a deep sigh of relief’ over Supreme Court rulings on elections — for now

        Barbara Rodriguez · July 6
      • Ranked-choice voting is gaining momentum. So are efforts to stop it.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 24
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Janet Protasiewicz and Dan Kelly stand at lecterns with a sign between them that says Campaign 2023 at the only one-on-one debate
Wisconsin Supreme Court candidates Janet Protasiewicz, left, and Dan Kelly participate in a debate on March 21, 2023, in Madison, Wis. (Morry Gash/AP)

Politics

Wisconsin Supreme Court debate — like much of the race — focuses on abortion

Early voting started Tuesday in the race between liberal Janet Protasiewicz and conservative Dan Kelly, which has become the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history.

Grace Panetta

Political reporter

Grace Panetta

Published

2023-03-21 15:09
3:09
March 21, 2023
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Your trusted source for contextualizing politics news. Subscribe to our daily newsletter.

The two candidates in a pivotal race for Wisconsin Supreme Court sparred on abortion access and judicial independence in their only one-on-one debate, held Tuesday afternoon.

The election between liberal Janet Protasiewicz and conservative Dan Kelly will decide the balance of the court and likely the fate of abortion in the state, where it has been inaccessible since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Both candidates singled out their opponent’s support from outside abortion-focused groups as evidence their decisions in a lawsuit over the state’s 1849 abortion ban, which is likely to end up in the high court, would be predetermined and based on politics as opposed to the law.  Protasiewicz has emphasized her support for abortion rights in her campaign messaging and attacked Kelly as extreme on the issue, highlighting his ties with Wisconsin’s anti-abortion groups. 

“I’ve been very clear about my values to the electorate because I think the electorate deserves to know what a person’s values are, rather than hiding them,” Protasiewicz said in the debate. “I’ve also been very clear that my decision that I render will be made based solely on the law and the constitution.” 

While Kelly has criticized abortion in earlier writings, he has not taken a clear position on its legality in this campaign. Throughout the debate, Kelly accused Protasiewicz of telling “sloppy,” “irresponsible” and “defamatory” lies about his positions and the nature of his support from anti-abortion groups. Protasaciewcz, meanwhile, derided Kelly as “one of the most extreme partisan characters in the history of the state.” 

The debate, hosted in Madison by the State Bar of Wisconsin in collaboration with WISC-TV and WisPolitics.com, came on the first day of early voting in the race to replace retiring conservative Justice Patience Roggensack. Election Day is April 4. 

The race, which has already broken a record for the most expensive judicial race in U.S. history, has attracted high amounts of outside spending, including by groups focused on abortion. The tenor of the debate reflected both the immense stakes — and the increasingly high levels of partisan rancor — in the technically nonpartisan race for Wisconsin’s Supreme Court. 

The political arm of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Wisconsin has spent over $150,000 in independent expenditures supporting Protasiewicz and opposing Kelly in March so far, according to campaign finance filings. Protasiewicz has also been backed by Emily’s List, the group’s first-ever endorsement in a judicial race. In the debate, she said she “wasn’t aware” of any direct contributions made to her campaign by either group.

“But if I can tell you my opponent is elected, I can tell you with 100 percent certainty that the 1849 abortion ban will stay on the books,” she added. 

  • Previous coverage
    Smiling portrait of Janet Protasiewicz
  • Janet Protasiewicz and Daniel Kelly will face off for crucial Wisconsin Supreme Court seat
  • Emily’s List jumps into Wisconsin Supreme Court election with endorsement of liberal judge
  • How Dobbs made the Wisconsin Supreme Court race one of the biggest elections of 2023

Kelly has been endorsed by Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America, a major national anti-abortion group, as well as Wisconsin Right to Life, Pro-Life Wisconsin and Family Action Wisconsin. Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America’s affiliated super PAC, Women Speak Out, has spent $36,000 in March supporting Kelly and opposing Protasiewicz. 

In the debate, both Protasiewicz and a question from one of the moderators pointed to language on the website of Wisconsin Right to Life stating that its political action committee endorses “candidates who have pledged to champion pro-life values.” Pro-Life Wisconsin says it endorses candidates “who recognize the personhood of the preborn baby and hold the principled and compassionate no-exceptions pro-life position.”

Kelly said it was “absolutely not true” and a “misrepresentation” by Protasiewicz that he had agreed to any pledges from either organization, saying Wisconsin Right to Life’s pledge applies to only state legislative candidates. The group’s website distinguishes that in judicial races, it backs candidates “whose judicial philosophies and values” align with the organization’s views.

“I had no conversations with those organizations about how I would rule on any issue, including the abortion issue,” Kelly said in response to a question from debate moderator and CBS 58 reporter Emilee Fannon. 

“I’m not a legislator, because I don’t talk about my politics. I understand what the court is supposed to do, and that’s resolving legal questions,” he added. “Those endorsements had nothing to do with the pledges required of those who run for political office.” 

Protasiewicz, in response, said it was up to “the big room of people” attending the debate to serve as the “jurors” in the matter. 

“I’ve told you what the website says, you’ve heard what he has to say,” she said. “I’ve also been very clear about what my views are, what my personal opinion is, in regards to a woman’s right to choose. My personal opinion is that it should be the woman’s right to make a reproductive health decision, period.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

Become a member

Up Next

State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh of Nebraska

LGBTQ+

Nebraska filibuster over trans rights echoes Wendy Davis’ 2013 abortion standoff

State Sen. Machaela Cavanaugh’s legislative blockade reflects how advocates for and against trans rights often rely on the playbook used in fights over abortion access.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Ways to Give
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram