Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Sen. Susan Collins walks with Sen. Lisa Murkowski on Capitol Hill.
Sen. Susan Collins walks with Sen. Lisa Murkowski on Capitol Hill. (Kent Nishimura/Los Angeles Times/Getty Images)

Abortion

Collins, Murkowski introduce alternative Senate bill to codify abortion rights

The two Republican senators dropped the bill as an amendment to the Women’s Health Protection Act, which failed to pass the Senate Monday.

By

Amanda Becker, Shefali Luthra

Published

2022-02-28 16:33
4:33
February 28, 2022
pm

Updated

2022-02-28 18:05:47.000000
America/Chicago

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Editor’s note: This article has been updated throughout.

The Women’s Health Protection Act failed to move forward in the U.S. Senate on Monday, just hours after two Republicans introduced an alternate measure they hope can be the start of bipartisan talks to codify abortion rights. 

Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska introduced the legislation as an amendment to the WHPA, which Democrats’ preferred to codify abortion rights. Both Republicans have supported abortion rights in the past, but voted no on the WHPA. 

The failure of the WHPA was expected.  It needed 60 votes to move forward in the evenly divided 100-seat Senate, and received 46 votes in support. An impetus for the push to enshrine abortion rights are two cases before the Supreme Court that could weaken or overturn Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that guaranteed abortion rights up to fetal viability. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Democratic Sen. Patty Murray warned ahead of the WHPA vote that “sometime in the next few months, we will, very likely, see the historic reversal of a fundamental right Americans have known for nearly 50 years regarding one of the most personal decisions any individual can make.”

Collins and Murkowski said in a statement provided to The 19th that the aim of their legislation would be to codify the Supreme Court’s rulings in Roe v. Wade and the 1992 case Planned Parenthood v. Casey, while preserving states’ rights to enact abortion-related statutes that comply with those rulings. 

  • More from The 19th
    Anti-abortion demonstrators march during the
  • Idaho and Oklahoma expected to be first states to pass Texas-inspired six-week abortion bans
  • Majority of abortions in 2020 were via medication, new data analysis shows
  • The 19th Explains: 15-week abortion bans may become law in three states. What does that mean?

“Our legislation would enshrine these important protections into law without undercutting statutes that have been in place for decades and provide basic conscience protections that are relied upon by health care providers who have religious objections to performing abortions,” Collins said. 

One concern that Collins and Murkowski cited is language in the WHPA related to a 1993 law meant to protect religious freedom. The WHPA states that except as specified, it “supersedes and applies to the law of the Federal Government and each State government,” including the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. That law “prohibits any agency, department or official of the United States or any State (the government) from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion.”

More generally, the two senators said they wanted to debate and revise any “extraneous and over-reaching provisions.”

Lawmakers have different notions of what it means to “codify Roe v. Wade.” The protections originally established in 1973 have been narrowed in subsequent decades, thanks to Planned Parenthood v. Casey and subsequent abortion rights cases. 

Democrats say the WHPA would codify Roe; but some Republicans, including Collins and Murkowski, say it would go further. Mary Ziegler, an abortion law expert at Florida State University, said that whether the WHPA is broader than Roe is hard to say, but it “definitely goes further than what is allowed under current abortion doctrine.”

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Ziegler said another factor is the Supreme Court’s forthcoming ruling in a case called Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization regarding a 15-week abortion ban. 

“The [WHPA] definitely frames the issue more as a matter of reproductive justice and definitely disallows more restrictions than the current interpretation of Roe/Casey,” Ziegler said. 

But at the same time, she added, “other people have a very different understanding of what Roe is — and the original Roe decision arguably looks different from what the court has interpreted it to mean.”

It’s unclear what congressional action on abortion rights could look like moving forward.

“As presently constituted, Congress isn’t going to do anything. That’s pretty clear … there’s going to be an open question about whether Dobbs changes that,” she added. 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

A volunteer waits near a polling station.

Election 2022

Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

Elected officials, volunteers and advocates have raised concerns about confusion over new mail voting rules and the reversal of practices that made it easier for many women and people with caregiving responsibilities to cast a ballot. 

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram