Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Donate to our newsroom

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion

Experts say Biden could use executive powers to protect abortion access

The White House vowed last October to pass laws that would maintain abortion protections. But so far, the administration has made little progress.

Joe Biden delivers remarks in front of the White House.
(Win McNamee/Getty Images)

Shefali Luthra

Reproductive Health Reporter

Published

2022-02-07 05:00
5:00
February 7, 2022
am

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

With legislation shoring up abortion access unlikely to pass Congress and the Supreme Court poised to scale back protections, the Biden administration appears unlikely to fulfill its promises to expand and protect abortion access — unless, as some advocates are calling for him to do, he uses executive powers.

Abortion rights, while hardly a signature issue for President Joe Biden, were a major component of the National Strategy on Gender Equity and Equality, a list of policy goals and commitments released in October by the administration. In that document, the White House vowed to “protect the constitutional right to safe and legal abortion established in Roe v. Wade.”

That commitment included “supporting the repeal of the Hyde Amendment,” which bars the use of federal funds to pay for an abortion. In practice, the Hyde Amendment prevents most states’ programs for Medicaid — the federal-state health insurance plan that covers low-income people — from covering abortion, which can cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Theoretically, the administration has taken steps in the direction of maintaining abortion access. It submitted a budget to Congress last May that would repeal the Hyde Amendment, though in Washington, the president’s budget is treated more as a signal of priorities than a serious policy proposal. It also endorsed the Women’s Health Protection Act, a bill that would codify Roe v. Wade protections. 

But the impact has been minimal. While both proposals have passed the U.S. House of Representatives, they have little chance of success in the Senate. Passing legislation such as the Women’s Health Protection Act requires 60 votes. Meanwhile, all 50 Democrats would need to unite to repeal the Hyde Amendment. Neither of those appears likely to happen. 

Sign up for more news and context delivered to your inbox, daily

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Preview of the daily newsletter from The 19th

The Senate is evenly split between the parties, but Democrats control the chamber because Vice President Kamala Harris has the tie-breaking vote. Two Democratic senators — Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Bob Casey of Pennsylvania — are generally unfriendly toward legislation that expands abortion access and declined to sign on in support of the Women’s Health Protection Act. Democrats’ margin has for now become even slimmer, with Sen. Ben Ray Luján, of New Mexico, temporarily incapacitated after a stroke. 

Meanwhile, Biden has said little publicly about the White House’s stance on abortion rights. 

The White House did not respond to multiple requests for updates on how or when it hopes to move forward with either effort. But the looming midterm elections mean the window to pass either bill into law may be growing narrower. Democrats are considered at great risk of losing their slim governing majorities in both the House and Senate this November, though some believe a ruling by the Supreme Court that restricts abortion access could mobilize their voters. 

Some experts suggested that, given the limited possibilities in Congress, the administration should use executive power.

“Legislative fixes are nonstarters, and every second that’s spent trying to work on legislation is a second that’s not being spent trying to affect access on the ground,” said David Cohen, a professor at Drexel University’s Kline School of Law, who focuses on constitutional law and gender. “I don’t think anyone thinks legislation is going to happen, and if they do they’re living in a fantasy world.”

There are a few avenues the White House could take, suggested Mary Ziegler, a law professor at Florida State University who studies abortion. In particular, she said, the Biden administration should rely on the the Food and Drug Administration to issue regulations that expand access to medication abortion, a two-pill regimen that people can use to safely end a pregnancy at home up until 10 weeks. 

“The most significant thing the Biden administration has done is through the FDA, and the most significant things the Biden administration will be able to do going forward are through the FDA,” she said. 

  • More from The 19th
    Woman looks at phone with image of mifepristone
  • Laws restricting abortion may also limit options for people who miscarry
  • ‘You never forget it’: These are the stories of life before Roe v. Wade transformed America
  • Proposed bill would cover breastfeeding support for families fleeing natural disasters

Already, the administration has moved in that direction.This past December, the agency loosened regulations on how one of the medication abortion pills — a drug known as mifepristone — is dispensed. Previously, the agency held that the mifepristone must be administered in-person, even though medical groups have long said that the pill can be safely taken at home. 

The FDA’s move — initially prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic and made permanent in December — allowed for medication abortion pills to be prescribed virtually and sent to patients through the mail, eliminating numerous barriers for patients who do not have the time or resources to travel to a licensed clinic or health care facility. 

But without more White House action, the impact will probably be limited. So far, 19 states have laws in place that require physicians to dispense mifepristone in-person, essentially rejecting the FDA guidance. More state legislatures are preparing similar legislation. The administration could attempt to overrule those state laws, Ziegler and others said, challenging them in court and arguing that the FDA regulations, as a representation of federal law, preempt state ones. 

There is no precedent for using FDA guidance to overrule state limitations on medication abortion. But it’s an argument that at least has a chance of succeeding in courts, legal experts said. 

“There is some support for the idea that states cannot ban FDA-approved medication,” said Greer Donley, an assistant professor at the University of Pittsburgh Law School, who specializes in laws surrounding medication abortion access. “This is a novel legal argument. Maybe it would mean states cannot ban the sale of medication abortion, which would mean states must allow abortion up to 10 weeks.”

Abortion rights activists demonstrate in front of Supreme Court.
Abortion rights activists demonstrate outside the Supreme Court in January 2022. (ALEX EDELMAN/AFP/Getty Images)

That could take on new relevance if the Supreme Court does use its major abortion case — Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — to overturn or severely weaken Roe v. Wade, an outcome legal observers say is highly likely. Such a ruling would eliminate the federal abortion rights guarantee and could allow states to ban abortion entirely. A decision in the case is expected this summer. 

If such an argument withstood legal challenges, it could render toothless any state law that attempted to ban abortion prior to 10 weeks of pregnancy. 

“If the Supreme Court does overrule Roe, there is more urgency for the Biden administration to pursue arguments like this,” Donley added. 

There are other strategies the administration could explore, experts said. The Department of Health and Human Services could encourage states to use their own Medicaid funds — which are not governed by the Hyde Amendment — to cover abortion services, though it’s not clear how much impact that would have. 

Cohen also suggested looking at whether the government could lease federal land to abortion clinics. In theory, those clinics could then operate within the borders of a state that has limited or even banned abortion. Since they would not be on state property, those clinics could be exempt from the state’s abortion laws and instead governed by only federal statute. (Similar approaches could be tried on reservation land, if tribal leaders also sought to maintain abortion access.)

Again, he added, it’s not guaranteed that such an approach would survive a court challenge. But it’s not out of the question, either. 

“It is possible that clinics can operate on federal lands without having to follow state law. That has to be explored. The federal government needs to push the envelope,” Cohen said. “It’s not a slam-dunk legal argument, but these are the kinds of things that need to be tried.”

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Tammy Duckworth (left) Elizabeth Warren and Maria Cantwell conduct a news conference outside the U.S. Capitol in support of reproductive rights.
Medication abortion and clinics on federal land: Here are Democrats’ ideas to protect abortion access
President Biden speaks in front of a microphone
Biden signs executive order on abortion access and legal backing
Xavier Becerra speaks from a podium during a news conference.
Biden administration officials offer few details on medication abortion protections
Abortion rights advocates rally in front of the Georgia State Capitol.
In 2021, states are poised to tighten abortion restrictions

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Our newsroom's Spring Member Drive is here!

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.