Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • The full PUMP Act is now in effect. Here’s what it does for lactating parents.

        Chabeli Carrazana · April 28
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: How to ease the ‘loneliness epidemic’ and social isolation among older adults

        Sara Luterman · April 24
      • The 19th Explains: Who will be most impacted by Medicaid changes — and when

        Rebekah Barber · March 28
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Ranked-choice voting is gaining momentum. So are efforts to stop it.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 24
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Rep. Jackie Speier speaks in front of an #ERANow sign at the Capitol.
Rep. Jackie Speier of California speaks in support of the Equal Rights Amendment in October. (Andrew Harnik/AP)

Politics

Should the ERA be in effect? On a key anniversary, it depends who you ask.

Democrats in Congress are pushing for its recognition, but the inclusion of the Equal Rights Amendment is caught up in complex questions of how, exactly, an amendment is added to the Constitution.

Barbara Rodriguez

State Politics and Voting Reporter

Barbara Rodriguez portrait

Published

2022-01-27 13:47
1:47
January 27, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

On a key anniversary for the Equal Rights Amendment, Democratic members of Congress this week launched a new effort to recognize the amendment and its gender equity protections under the Constitution — but what it will mean in the long run remains unclear.

Rep. Jackie Speier of California announced Thursday that she would help file a resolution that recognizes that the amendment is a part of the Constitution because the text of the ERA states that it goes into effect two years after enough states ratify it. 

Thursday marks exactly two years since lawmakers in the Virginia legislature ratified the ERA, making it the 38th and final state needed to add the amendment to the Constitution. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“This resolution draws attention to the fact that it is law, and should be reflected as such,” Speier told The 19th.

But the ERA’s addition as the country’s 28th Amendment has been ensnared in questions of legitimacy by opponents who say the last three states that ratified the ERA — Nevada in 2017, Illinois in 2018 and Virginia in 2020 — did so way past deadlines imposed by Congress in the 1970s and 1980s for ratifying the amendment. Litigation has followed, and some attorneys believe more legal challenges are on the way if people believe they can now cite the ERA in gender discrimination lawsuits

Supporters of the ERA have noted in part that the rules around adding an amendment are ambiguous but that those spelled out in the Constitution — that Congress must approve it with a two-thirds majority and so must three-fourths of state legislatures — have been met. They’ve also emphasized their belief that Congress has the power to decide what happens next.

A newsletter for the new electorate

Analysis and interviews from Errin Haines, delivered to your inbox every other week.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The resolution from Speier and Rep. Carolyn Maloney of New York comes after the U.S. Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) on Wednesday released a new opinion, this one revising its 2020 opinion about the amendment’s future.

The 2020 opinion, under the Trump administration, said that a deadline imposed decades ago by Congress was binding. Further, it said the United States archivist, a federal employee who certifies new amendments to the U.S. Constitution, did not have the authority to certify the ERA. The archivist has cited that DOJ opinion in refusing to certify the ERA.

A lawsuit filed by attorneys general for the last three states that ratified the ERA also challenged the archivist’s actions. A district court judge dismissed the lawsuit last year, saying there was no legal grounds to proceed. An appeal is pending.

  • More from The 19th
    Speaker Pelosi and the Women's Caucus speak to the media
  • In 2022, a revived legal fight over the ERA takes shape
  • Why didn’t Congress codify abortion rights?

The latest OLC opinion does not withdraw the previous one but instead clarifies that the law does not provide “clear guidance” on the ratification process. It also does not instruct the archivist to certify the ERA.

“Whether the ERA is part of the Constitution will be resolved not by an OLC opinion but by the courts and Congress,” according to the opinion.

President Joe Biden noted the new opinion’s potential significance in a statement Thursday that called on Congress to act “immediately” to pass a resolution recognizing the ERA. He did not mention the archivist.

“As the recently published Office of Legal Counsel memorandum makes clear, there is nothing standing in Congress’s way from doing so. No one should be discriminated against based on their sex — and we, as a nation, must stand up for full women’s equality,” he said.

ERA supporters see a ‘significant victory’

Supporters of the Equal Rights Amendment cheered on the developments Thursday during a news conference that preceded a planned rally.

“In sum, we did it,” said Maloney during the news conference. “I want to take a moment to celebrate all of the ERA advocates who never gave up the fight. We are on the cusp of making history and empowering women thanks to their tenacity.” 

The latest resolution effort is separate from a resolution passed in 2020 and 2021 by House Democrats that effectively aims to remove any time limits associated with the ERA. While a handful of Republicans have expressed support for the amendment in the Senate, they have not passed the resolution in that chamber.

Separately this week, Speier, Maloney and a handful of Democratic senators — Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada — sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Justice seeking that it withdraw its 2020 opinion. Their efforts came shortly before the OLC released its new opinion.

The ERA Project at Columbia Law School’s Center for Gender and Sexuality has developed legal analysis on the Equal Rights Amendment. The group, which does not lobby lawmakers but instead shares research with them and others, also believes the 2020 DOJ opinion should be withdrawn in part because it goes beyond the scope of the office’s duties. It called Thursday’s new opinion “a significant victory.”

“Congress historically has the role, and constitutionally has the role, to resolve any disputes in the Constitutional amendment process,” Ting Ting Cheng, director of the ERA Project, told The 19th.

A process nearly a century long

The process of adding gender equity to the Constitution, specifically through the ERA, dates back nearly 100 years. There is little precedent on next steps, in part because there is limited case law on the amendment process.

Supporters of the ERA have often pointed to the history of other amendments to show the process has always been messy. When the 14th Amendment — which granted citizenship and other legal protections to Black Americans — was added to the Constitution, a handful of states rescinded their ratification votes. Congress still included those states in the final tally needed to add it to the Constitution. (Some states have also rescinded their support for the ERA.)

The 27th Amendment, which stated rules for congressional pay, was added to the Constitution in the early 1990s, more than 200 years after Congress ratified it. Legal experts at the time raised questions about its inclusion to the Constitution, but enough members of Congress asserted collective agreement despite the lapse in time.

David Pozen, a law professor at Columbia Law School who also serves on an academic advisory council for the ERA Project, has written about the ambiguity of the rules under Article V of the Constitution, which defines how an amendment can be added. He has argued Congress has the power to take action regarding constitutional amendments.

Pozen said the more members of Congress back the ERA, the more the public will accept it is a part of the Constitution. There is a subjectivity over what exact action Congress must take now — whether it’s majority votes in both chambers or supermajority votes — to turn the tide in terms of acknowledging the amendment.

“There will be no magic moment when it’s like, ‘Oh, now the ERA is in there, now it’s the 28th Amendment,’ Pozen told The 19th. “Because there never is. It’s a much more diffused, complex process of just Americans acting as if something has made it across the line.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

Supreme Court justices

Politics

Biden poised to nominate first Black woman to Supreme Court

The retirement of Stephen Breyer sets the stage for the president to make good on a campaign promise.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram