Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Miseducation: How Climate Change Is Taught in America book cover
Courtesy of Katie Worth

Education

The problem with how children in the U.S. are learning about climate change

Katie Worth's new book, ‘Miseducation,’ says climate change deniers and the fossil fuel industry seek to influence what students learn about global warming.

Nadra Nittle

Education reporter

Nadra Nittle

Published

2022-01-27 09:02
9:02
January 27, 2022
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

What students learn about climate change can vary widely from state to state and, sometimes, even within the same school. And not all of what they learn is true.  For her new book, “Miseducation: How Climate Change Is Taught in America,” Katie Worth,  an award-winning former investigative journalist at Frontline PBS, reviewed dozens of science textbooks and visited communities across the country to speak to students and teachers about climate change instruction.

Worth’s book not only identifies a red-blue divide in how states approach lessons about global warming but also efforts by oil corporations, conservative lobbyists, state legislatures and others to fuel skepticism about climate science. Although most Americans believe that climate change is occurring, just one in four know that nearly all scientists agree that it is and that humans are the cause. Public ignorance about how the scientific community views global warming has given climate denialism the chance to infiltrate the classroom, “Miseducation” contends. 

In an interview with The 19th, Worth addressed how climate science deniers and corporate interests are influencing science education and what teachers are doing to ensure that students learn the truth about global warming. She also discussed how young women are emerging as climate change activists and global warming intersects with gender justice and other social concerns.  

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity. 

Nadra Nittle: What made you want to write a book about how schools teach climate change?

Katie Worth: I was assigned a story about climate change in the Marshall Islands and talked to students there in 2017. The kids there could speak really fluently about climate change, and one of the kids’ families was thinking about moving to Oklahoma. The question arose, ‘What would they learn about climate change in Oklahoma?’ I kind of got curious about that and tried to get a picture of what climate change education looks like in America. I was curious if there had been any efforts to push climate denialism in schools.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

I decided to attend a conference by the Heartland Institute, a conservative think tank based in Chicago, that brings all the climate denialists together. The-then president president of the Heartland Institute told me that they were just starting to send out packets to every science teacher in America that included a book called ‘Why Scientists Disagree About Global Warming’ — which, of course, they do not — and a DVD called ‘Unstoppable Solar Cycles,’ which presents a theory that global warming is happening because of solar cycles. There’s not actually any evidence that this is true, but, sure enough, hundreds of thousands of science teachers in America received this book. Most threw it away; some of them used it. So, it just felt like there was rich territory there for reporting. 

In the book, you discuss the fossil fuel industry’s influence on science education. What role is that industry playing and how does it trickle down to students in the classroom?

In some places the influence is subtle, and, in others, it’s not so subtle. The fossil fuel industry has created a lot of curricular materials that they put online for free, so if a teacher Googles, say, ‘energy lesson, fifth grade,’ they may very well find their way to a lesson plan that was developed or paid for by the fossil fuel industry and does not go into depth about climate change. In some states, the oil and gas industry association sends people out to schools to give presentations that pump up the reputation of the fossil fuel industry. In Oklahoma, they produce kids’ books like ‘Petro Pete’s Big Bad Dream’ about a little boy who wakes up in a world where there are no petroleum products, and it’s a total nightmare. That book is in every elementary school in Oklahoma. And the fossil fuel industry’s influence on how standards are adopted in some places was very visible in Texas this last year. The oil industry pushed hard to water down what was in the standards about climate change.

One point the book raises that readers may not know is that science instruction varies from one state to another. The next generation science standards provide a framework for K-12 science education. But many states have not adopted them, and those that have differ in their approach to these standards.   

The next generation science standards was an effort of educators from all over the country to think about what the research says about how to teach kids about science. What’s the best pedagogy? How can we make a better set of standards or best practices? And then those teachers went back to their own states and tried to get their states to adopt the standards or a version of them.

How are teachers circumventing climate change denialism?

There’s a ton of teachers who really care about this issue and want their students to be engaged, so they teach climate change. But there’s lots of teachers who avoid the issue or they teach it as a debate, asking whether or not climate change is happening or whether or not it’s being caused by humans. They’re basically asking students to debate something that scientists don’t debate, and that’s a big problem. A lot of teachers themselves didn’t learn about climate change in school. They don’t have a lot of support or professional development resources to learn about it. They know that there’s going to be pushback if they teach about climate change, so they kind of just sidestep it. But there are some efforts to make sure teachers do have lessons on climate change. In Washington, they’re working on giving every science teacher in the state a seminar on how to incorporate climate change into their lessons. Having a concerted program like ClimeTime to get them to think through how to bring up the topic in their own classrooms is really helpful and necessary.

Early on in the book, you discuss how a history teacher at a school in Chico, California, was showing students climate change hoax videos, making it difficult for the science teacher nearby to teach students about global warming. So, within the same school in a liberal state like California, students were getting very different messages about climate change. What are your thoughts about that?

There’s a mix of people of all ideologies in each state. So, that means even in the reddest states, there’s teachers who are intrepidly teaching that subject no matter what the standards say or what’s in their official curriculum, just because they think it’s important and that students deserve to know. Then, in even the most liberal communities, there are people who have really absorbed this idea that the science is unsure and that it’s all a hoax, and they pass that onto their students in some way, either directly, the way that that history teacher was doing, or kind of more indirectly, like teaching it as a debate.

Your book argues that climate change instruction is important for students not only because they need to understand science but also because they’re already experiencing the effects of global warming. 

That’s one of the arguments that educators make about why we should talk to students about this issue. It’s arguably the most important scientific issue of our century and definitely one of the most socially important ones, and it’s already impacting the world. It’s not like some hypothetical, futuristic problem; it’s already happening and these kids are already living through it. At the end of the book, I talk about being in Chico and observing a class of middle school students whose school had been closed because it was in a wildfire, and they were displaced into a hardware store because that was the only real estate available for that school. Those kids in that school could arguably be called climate refugees, but lots of them had never even heard of climate change, or if they had heard anything about it, they’d heard that it was a hoax, even as their lives had already been transformed by it. Students have a right to understand the world that they’re born into, and this is a central theme of that world. This knowledge also allows them to participate in the solutions, to kind of roll up their sleeves and get to work with the rest of us.

  • More from The 19th
    Students from Boston Latin Academy in Dorchester walk out of class in protest of the lack of protection from COVID.
  • Girls emerge as leaders of student walkouts over COVID concerns
  • Lawsuits, complaints and protests are upending sexist school dress codes
  • Can pay raises help solve a teacher shortage? States hope so.

Do you see similarities between efforts to promote climate change denialism in schools and the movement to ban critical race theory in schools, which has garnered much more attention?  

I think CRT, critical race theory, has gotten a ton of attention in the last year. Schools have become a focus of the culture war. Climate change has not been the central focus; race and  sexuality have been. But from my reporting, I know that there’s a ton of friction over what kids learn about climate change. I hardly talked to a single teacher who didn’t have some story about getting pushback from parents, students, other teachers or their own administration. It’s become this political issue, so I think climate change is part of the same culture war as CRT. Denialists are trying to control what kids learn and don’t learn, and that’s happening with the CRT debate, too.

‘Miseducation’ mentions Greta Thunberg’s work to raise awareness about climate change. Do you think the activism of Greta and other young women, like Vanessa Nakate, will influence students in the U.S. to take an interest in climate change, even if they’re not learning about it in school?

School isn’t the only place kids learn. They learn from the media. They learn from their family. They learn from social media. So, even if they’re not encountering information about climate change in their school, they are encountering information about it elsewhere, and student activists like Greta and many others are a powerful force. It can actually work backwards, where students are engaged in this issue, and then they go talk to their teachers, and they’re like, ‘Hey, I want to know about this,’ or, ‘Oh, we’re on a weather unit. Tell me about climate change.’ And then the teachers who want to engage their class and want to be teaching things that the class is interested in start incorporating that into their lessons. There’s also evidence that there’s an intergenerational effect. There’s a really interesting study done where they looked at what happened when they educated kids in this really conservative community and how that affected their parents, and what they found was when they educate the kids about climate change, their parents became more concerned about climate change, because the kids were coming home and talking to their parents, and then the parents were like, ‘Oh, yeah, I should learn about that.’ That effect was especially powerful with little girls, and especially effective on fathers.

Increasingly, climate change has been framed as a racial justice issue, a gender justice justice issue, an economic justice issue. Might framing climate change in this way make students more concerned about it? 

Absolutely. This issue layers on to all of the other systems of oppression in our world, and there’s plenty of evidence that shows that women will suffer more because of climate change, than men globally, and that people of color and poor people will suffer more than privileged folks globally. It’s not happening in a vacuum. It’s happening within the context of a heteropatriarchal, racist world, and so for people who are interested in racial justice, social justice or gender justice, climate change absolutely fits into that picture.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Students from Boston Latin Academy in Dorchester walk out of class in protest of the lack of protection from COVID.

Education

Girls emerge as leaders of student walkouts over COVID concerns

Girls’ activism has become more visible in recent years — and also tends to come with specific types of harassment and dismissal.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram