Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s swearing in makes history during unprecedented time for the Supreme Court

        Candice Norwood · June 30
      • Biden’s new environmental justice office aims to tackle the health impacts disproportionately faced by people of color

        Jessica Kutz · June 2
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: How pregnant people can prepare for a summer of heat waves

        Jessica Kutz · June 17
      • The 19th Explains: How new Title IX guidelines on sexual misconduct may give more help to survivors

        Nadra Nittle · June 14
      • The 19th Explains: How would overturning Roe v. Wade affect IVF?

        Jennifer Gerson · May 27
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Support The 19th

As a nonprofit newsroom, members are critical to our sustainability. Your financial support helps make our journalism possible.

Become a Member

Donate to support our mission

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland arrives at a news conference to announce a civil enforcement action at the Department of Justice.
U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland arrives at a news conference to announce a civil enforcement action at the Department of Justice. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Abortion

The 19th Explains: Will Texas’ six-week abortion ban be blocked by the courts?

The federal government is asking a judge in Texas to block the state’s six-week abortion ban. Its argument could hold up, legal experts say.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2021-09-16 15:37
3:37
September 16, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The Department of Justice is seeking to block Texas’ six-week abortion ban — the most restrictive active abortion law in the country — which has been in effect for two weeks. The request came in a court filing Tuesday night, part of the case known as United States v. Texas. 

Attorney General Merrick Garland announced last week that the DOJ had filed suit against Texas over its law, Senate Bill 8, which he called “clearly unconstitutional under long-standing Supreme Court precedent.” 

Previous Supreme Court rulings — 1973’s Roe v. Wade and 1992’s Planned Parenthood v. Casey — have held that the Constitution guarantees the right to an abortion up until a fetus can independently live outside the womb. Texas’ law bans the procedure not only before viability but also before many people even know they are pregnant.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

What will the DOJ’s request mean for abortion access in Texas? The 19th reached out to legal experts to learn more.

What happens now?

The DOJ has requested either a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction that would temporarily block the law as legal arguments proceed.

“This relief is necessary to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States in ensuring that its States respect the terms of the national compact,” the filing reads. “It is also necessary to protect federal agencies, employees, and contractors whose lawful actions S.B. 8 purports to prohibit.”

The DOJ is making its argument before the federal court for the Western District of Texas. The judge handling the case has slated arguments for October 1. 

That means the law will have been in effect for at least a full month. Even if it is blocked, the impact will be significant.

“It may be a permanent loss of the number of clinics that are available,” said Carol Sanger, a professor at Columbia Law School who studies abortion law.

Already, clinics are scaling back services as a result of SB 8. Some are no longer providing any abortions whatsoever. Fear of legal action means that some doctors who previously provided abortions in Texas also have stopped — even abortions before six weeks of pregnancy.

“The law is in effect. It has essentially shuttered abortion providers in Texas,” said Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University who studies reproductive policy. “If you are a pregnant person seeking an abortion in Texas right now, that’s dead on arrival.”

What argument is the DOJ making? Is it likely to succeed?

SB 8 is different from previous bans. Rather than criminalizing the procedure, the law empowers private citizens to sue anyone who may have helped another person get an abortion after six weeks.

That structure has made the law harder to challenge in court. When asked to intervene in a previous lawsuit over the ban brought by abortion providers in the state — Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson — the Supreme Court’s conservative majority did not address whether the Texas ban is constitutional. Instead, the five justices cited the unusual punishment scheme in its decision not to block the law.

But the DOJ could have more luck. It is making a distinct, new argument in its case. The lawsuit argues that Texas’ law interferes with the United States government’s ability to effectively govern the nation and protect the rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution. 

It targets both the law’s specific ban on abortion and the lawsuit component of SB 8, arguing that neither is constitutional.

“Texas devised an unprecedented scheme that seeks to deny women and providers the ability to challenge S.B. 8 in federal court. This attempt to shield a plainly unconstitutional law from review cannot stand,” the DOJ’s brief reads. 

An injunction, it adds, is necessary “to protect the constitutional rights of women in Texas and the sovereign interest of the United States in ensuring that its States respect the terms of the national compact.”

Because United States v. Texas is making a separate argument from the Whole Woman’s Health case, the DOJ could succeed in winning an injunction, even when the clinics did not.

“Whether they have a better chance has to do with whether they have better arguments,” Sanger said. “They’re saying what’s at stake is the United States defending the Constitution.”

What would an injunction do? 

If the DOJ’s request is granted, either a preliminary injunction or temporary restraining order would effectively halt SB 8 while the law is being challenged in court. Lawsuits could not be filed under its civil enforcement provision, and abortion providers could legally perform the procedure at or after six weeks pregnancy.

That could allow the vast majority of abortions to resume in Texas. But it wouldn’t be the end of the case. 

If the district court grants an injunction, Texas has the right to appeal to the next level – the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. That court is considered one of the most conservative appeals courts in the country. 

The appeals court has the power to block any injunction if it finds fault with the district court’s reasoning. If that happened, it could create a ping-pong effect — where the Texas ban ricochets between being in place and not.  

“You could see this sort of oscillating, ‘We’re open! We’re closed!’ And that doesn’t help either,” Murray said. “There are so many women in Texas who wonder if they have this right. That could further complicate things.”

After the 5th Circuit, the next remaining avenue for appeal would be the U.S. Supreme Court. But it’s hard to know if or when that court would hear such an appeal, or whether the nation’s abortion laws the DOJ is trying to safeguard will have changed before then.

How does the Texas lawsuit factor in with other abortion cases?

The Supreme Court is scheduled to hear a different abortion case — Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health — this coming term. In that case, the court will hear oral arguments regarding a Mississippi law that bans abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy. That law has not taken effect.

It’s possible — though not guaranteed — that the Dobbs case will be decided before the Supreme Court has a chance to weigh in on Texas’ law. A verdict upholding the Mississippi law would undermine or eliminate the abortion rights protections guaranteed by Roe v. Wade and affirmed in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. 

Such a decision could make it easier for lower courts to uphold Texas’ ban, too.

“That would turn the whole [abortion] question back to the states,” Murray said. “Now all of a sudden it’s not clear the constitution protects the right to an abortion pre-viability, and we’re trying to figure out whether 12 or six weeks is OK. And then, SB8 isn’t so blatantly unconstitutional.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Support The 19th

As a nonprofit newsroom, members are critical to our sustainability. Your financial support helps make our journalism possible.

Become a Member

Donate to support our mission

From the Collection

The 19th Explains

People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
  • The 19th Explains: How pregnant people can prepare for a summer of heat waves

    Jessica Kutz · June 17
  • The 19th Explains: How new Title IX guidelines on sexual misconduct may give more help to survivors

    Nadra Nittle · June 14
  • The 19th Explains: How would overturning Roe v. Wade affect IVF?

    Jennifer Gerson · May 27

Up Next

Simone Biles speaks to McKayla Maroney and Aly Raisman.

Health

‘Not ever over’: Simone Biles, U.S. gymnasts castigate FBI over its failures on Larry Nassar case

The gymnasts testified at a Senate hearing on the bureau's delayed -- and flawed -- response to early accusations against the team doctor.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram