Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Donate to our newsroom

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Health

Abortion providers’ main legal challenge to Texas’ six-week abortion ban is effectively over

Friday’s decision by the Texas Supreme Court could signal that similar abortion bans are likely to stay enforced and successfully survive legal challenges.

Anti-abortion rights demonstrators march during the "Right To Life" rally in Dallas, Texas in January 2022.
Anti-abortion rights demonstrators march during the "Right To Life" rally in Dallas, Texas in January 2022. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)

By

Shefali Luthra, Barbara Rodriguez

Published

2022-03-11 11:01
11:01
March 11, 2022
am

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

Abortion providers’ main legal challenge to Texas’ six-week abortion ban is effectively over: A ruling Friday by the Texas Supreme Court will keep Senate Bill 8 in effect indefinitely.

The law, which appears to violate the abortion rights protections established in 1973 by Roe v. Wade, has been in effect since September 1 and has forced thousands of Texans to travel out of state for abortions.

The law has survived legal challenges because of its unusual structure. Instead of criminalizing the procedure after six weeks, it deputizes private citizens to sue anyone who “aids or abets” the provision of such an abortion, with successful plaintiffs receiving a minimum of $10,000. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to block the law. In December, it ruled that abortion providers could challenge the law, but only on very narrow grounds. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority ruled abortion providers could sue state medical licensing officials — health boards, for example — that are empowered to penalize health care providers who violate the abortion ban. But in a loss for the providers, the justices said they could not sue state officials who helped process the civil lawsuits that constitute SB 8’s main penalty.

At the time, legal experts suggested that the decision significantly weakened abortion providers’ odds of eventually getting the law blocked. And the Friday decision from the Texas Supreme Court suggests they were right. 

  • More abortion coverage from The 19th
    Nurses check women's vitals as they lay down before, or after their abortions.
  • Texas’ six-week abortion ban is still causing more than twice as many patients at clinics in nearby states
  • Why so many abortion restrictions are working their way through state legislatures now
  • Idaho is the second state to ban abortion after six weeks

After ruling on SB 8, the U.S. Supreme Court relegated the case back to a lower federal court, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit. That court was asked to reconsider a question that the Supreme Court appeared to have settled: whether abortion providers could in fact sue state medical licensing officials. If the answer was no, there would be no state entity abortion providers could sue, and no avenue for them to challenge the law in court and seek a ruling blocking its enforcement.

At the end of January, the 5th Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, sent the case to the Texas Supreme Court. In a decision released Friday, that court dealt a blow to the state’s abortion providers, finding that medical licensing officials don’t actually enforce the state’s abortion ban. 

The decision has effectively blocked a significant pathway for abortion providers to challenge the law in its totality. Providers can challenge individuals who sue under SB 8. Lawsuits are also pending in the state court. 

The decision comes at a critical moment for abortion rights law. The U.S. Supreme Court is weighing a challenge to Roe v. Wade, and expected to issue a ruling this summer that could weaken federal abortion protections. In anticipation, conservative-led state are pushing forth bills that would further restrict abortion access.

Oklahoma and Idaho’s state Senates have passed bills that would emulate Texas’ six-week ban. Those bills have yet to be voted on by the respective Houses or signed by the governor. But Friday’s decision could encourage them to move forward with such bills, by signaling that a Texas-inspired abortion ban is likely to stay enforced and successfully survive legal challenges.

Leah Litman, a constitutional law expert at the University of Michigan, said the ruling could impact how policymakers in other statehouses think about the enforcement component.

“It basically provides more incentives to states to adopt laws like SB 8 in order to insulate their laws from judicial review and allow states to put in place laws that nullify people’s ability to exercise constitutional rights without having to defend those laws in court,” she said.

The decision could have an impact on other kind of bills moving through statehouses, Litman said. In Missouri, two bills have been introduced that would ban ectopic pregnancies and traveling out of state to obtain abortions. Both use a similar punitive structure to Texas’ six-week abortion ban.

“There’s just no reason to think that this enforcement structure and these implications are going to be limited to the context of abortion bans after six weeks,” she said. “Which makes the implications all the more troubling.”

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland arrives at a news conference to announce a civil enforcement action at the Department of Justice.
The 19th Explains: Will Texas’ six-week abortion ban be blocked by the courts?
A view of the U.S. Supreme Court under a cloudy sky.
Supreme Court to hear two challenges to Texas abortion law on November 1
Sunset light illuminates the U.S. Supreme Court building.
The 19th Explains: Texas’ six-week abortion ban is still stuck in court. Here’s why.
Oklahoma Gov. Kevin Stitt delivers a speech.
Oklahoma just passed a near-total abortion ban. More restrictions are likely coming.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Our newsroom's Spring Member Drive is here!

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.