Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Rep. Barbara Lee has sponsored legislation seeking to repeal the authorizations of military force that sent United States forces to Afghanistan and Iraq. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Politics

Barbara Lee is still warning about the perils of “forever wars” 20 years after 9/11

In 2001, the House Democrat was the only member of Congress to vote against the War on Terror.  She says we need to “start reimagining our national security strategies.”

Amanda Becker

Washington Correspondent

Amanda Becker portrait

Published

2021-09-10 13:09
1:09
September 10, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Twenty years ago, as the country reeled from the September 11 attacks and Congress moved quickly to authorize the use of military force in what became known as the U.S. War on Terror, Rep. Barbara Lee urged her colleagues to “pause, just for a minute.”

“Some of us must urge the use of restraint, our country is in a state of mourning,” the California Democrat said ahead of congressional votes authorizing President George W. Bush to use “all necessary and appropriate force” to respond to terrorism.

“Some of us must say, ‘Let’s step back for a moment, let’s just pause, just for a minute, and think through the implications of our actions today so that this does not spiral out of control,’” Lee added.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

But, when the House of Representatives and Senate voted, there was no “us.” Lee was the only lawmaker in either chamber to vote against the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) that started a 20-year U.S. military presence in Afghanistan that spanned the administrations of four presidents and resulted in the deaths of more than 2,400 American troops. 

The 19th spoke to Lee ahead of the 20-year anniversary of the terrorist attacks, and as President Joe Biden’s administration completes the United States’ withdrawal from the country, about “forever wars,” why she opposed the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs and her bills to repeal both. 

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Amanda Becker: I think people forget how quickly the vote to authorize the use of military force to fight terrorism came after the 9/11 attacks, just three days later, on September 14. Looking back, what was the tenor in Congress and what was on your mind as you were weighing that vote?

Barbara Lee: The quickness of it, first of all. It was such an overly broad authorization that set the stage — I knew then — for forever wars, in terms of a president never having to come back to Congress for authorization for going to war, or using military force anywhere in the world. I knew that. 

I also knew very clearly, based on my background in psychology and clinical social work, that you don’t make hard, serious decisions when you’re in the midst of grieving and when you’re mourning, when you’re angry, when you’re emotional. And of course our country was grieving. We lost so many people. A terrorist attack shocked the very core of our democracy. It was a horrific time. And three days later we come up with an authorization that was so overly broad that the costs and consequences were not even debated. Really, quite frankly, I don’t believe we knew what we were doing, other than responding to the horrific attacks and attempting to bring terrorists to justice. 

I’m not a pacifist. My father was a lieutenant colonel, retired from the military after 25 years, served in Korea, and in World War II. I know the grave implications of sending our troops into harm’s way, and the impact on military families. And I know we’d better be ready, we’d better know what we’re doing. We’d better do this with our strategy in mind and an exit strategy. Congress needs to know exactly what the deal is. I didn’t think three days after this terrible attack that we had enough information or knew exactly what we should do.

Did you know when you voted ‘no’ that you would be the only one? Do you think with more time you could have gotten to a place where you could have voted yes? Or did you think, at that point, it was just not a good idea to get involved in Afghanistan in any capacity? 

No, I did not know who was going to vote for it; that wasn’t even part of my thought process. I didn’t see this in political terms. I knew that it was much too soon to come up with whatever response we will come up with. We have to think through the implications of our actions today, and what it would mean for tomorrow, for the troops. Would we be able to accomplish the mission? Would it prevent further acts of terrorism? Members of Congress needed to be thoughtful, rational and clear on why we were doing what we were doing. I did not know who was going to vote yes, who was going to vote no. I figured most members would vote yes. But I tried to talk to members in our Democratic caucus and speak up and talk about why I thought this was not the right time and why I thought it was overly broad, and we should take time — if we were going to respond to militarily — to know what the heck was going on, what we were doing.

Right now, you are working to resettle refugees as they are evacuated — you and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez recently sent a letter to the Biden administration asking them to raise the refugee admissions cap. What do you expect going forward in terms of the resettlement process?

I think we need to lift the cap, as we said in our letter, so we’re working now to get the administration to lift the cap on refugees. Secondly, I’ve talked with the administration about what we can develop as a plan that would help women, especially, and children and girls, to make sure that the progress they’ve made is not thwarted, and that their security is such that we can ensure their safety. 

  • More from The 19th
  • ‘A moral obligation’: How agencies help Afghan women who can escape
  • Women first responders were erased from the 9/11 story. This woman wants to change that
  • ‘Can’t wait to tell my grandkids I was here’: The women arrested for storming the Capitol

A lot of that has to do with who our allies will be: Are we going to work with NGOs? The United Nations? All of that is still coming together. We know who the Taliban government is — I’m not sure what kind of partner they’re going to be. We have to find ways to do our development, diplomatic and humanitarian work for women and girls and children — and for the Afghan people in general — through a variety of non governmental ways, or with our allies. So that’s what we’re working on now. 

Also, I’m helping to raise money for Afghan resettlement in my area, like many members of Congress throughout the country are, because they absolutely need our help. They supported the United States, we need to support them. That’s just the way it works. We have to honor what they did, and help them by whatever means necessary. There’s also this big issue between asylum seekers versus refugees. We’ve got to sort all that out. But we need to make sure that the benefits are there, that they get resettled, that they are able to get decent jobs and housing.

Your legislation to repeal the 2002 AUMF against Iraq passed the House. What’s next? Do you feel good about that happening this year?

We’re certainly working on it and I’m hoping Sen. [Chuck] Schumer will bring it up on the Senate floor [for a vote]. I’ve talked with Sen. [Tim] Kaine, and we have Republican support, but I’m not sure how many Republican votes right now. It’s a priority of mine to try to get it onto the Senate floor. We were looking at possibly September, but we want it done as quickly as possible. The president has indicated that he would sign it, he issued a statement of administration policy when I brought it to the floor of the House. And so we just have to keep working and asking Sen. Schumer to make sure that it’s a priority and I know Sen. Kaine is doing just that.

Do you think your other bill, to repeal 2001’s AUMF, will get some renewed support or interest as we kind of watch this withdrawal play out and you’re debating repealing the 2002 AUMF?

Yes, we have a working group of national security members who are across the spectrum politically. Most agree that there has to be a sunset to these AUMFs and that we have to have some guardrails and criteria. What I’m trying to do is get my 2001 passed, which repeals the 2001 authorization, which is Afghanistan, but actually leaves it in place for eight months in case the president thinks that he needs to use that. Because what we’re talking about is, should we replace it versus should we not, should we repeal? We’re having those discussions. My position is: We passed the 2001 AUMF in three days, you can’t tell me Congress can’t pass another one within eight months’ time if the president thinks he needs the authorization to use force. We’re working very diligently, all of us together with different points of views, bringing them together, so that we can get the 2001 repealed.

You’ve talked about the dangers of an imperial presidency and how Congress has abdicated its responsibility. Could you explain to somebody who isn’t as well versed as you are on this topic what that means and how the 2001 and 2002 AUMF votes should have played out versus how they did?

There are three branches of government, the judicial, the legislative and the executive branch. Each branch has their role and responsibilities per our Constitution. The Constitution requires members of Congress to authorize or declare war, not the president. The president can always use the military option to go to war if we’re under imminent threat, that’s a given, but when it comes to the issue of inserting our troops into a war, then in fact, the Congress must authorize it. Otherwise, this does create an imperial presidency, which it is now quite frankly. 

Any president — President Bush, President Obama, President Trump, now President Biden — they all can use that authorization that we passed in 2001 in perpetuity to go anywhere in the world. And they’ve used it over 41 times. I have a declassified study done by the Library of Congress, which has shown where this authorization has been used, in no way connected to 9/11. For instance, in Niger, where those brave troops were killed. It’s been used for domestic spying. It’s been used all over the world not related to 9/11. So the bottom line is: If the president wants to go to war, constitutionally, he’s required to come to Congress. In our democracy, this is the people’s house, the people’s voice. So what it means now is that the people in our country have lost their ability to have their voice and their positions heard. We’ve abdicated your voice, the people’s voice, to the executive branch. That’s what an imperial presidency entails. And to me, that is fundamentally a slippery slope we’re on in this country.

Are there lessons for lawmakers from the last 20 years in Afghanistan and how our presence there ended? 

First of all, one is you can’t go around the world nation building. I think that’s what we attempted to do in Afghanistan. Several trillion dollars have been lost. We know the Afghan government was corrupt, and we’re trying to find out exactly how much U.S. tax dollars were spent and stolen in Afghanistan. 

We need to get defense spending under control, it’s $740 billion [for Fiscal Year 2021]. What we’ve been trying to get [Congress] to do is support a minimum 10 percent cut in defense spending, that’s $74 billion that could be used to support our troops, enhance their quality of life and also for domestic spending. So that’s one lesson people need to really think about. It’s not going to harm our national security, we have counterterrorism measures in place, and we have more than enough resources to maintain global leadership in the world as it relates to defense. 

We need to have more balance between defense, diplomacy and development. I chair the subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee that funds all of our development and diplomatic initiatives. My budget is $62 billion. The country needs to start reimagining our national security strategies and recognize how we get to peace and security, and it’s not necessarily through using the military-first approach. That’s the second lesson: Let’s think about the fact that the military solution is always on the table if the president needs it, but why do we use that as the first option? Why don’t we seek to find a variety of strategies that can help reduce tensions in the world and create for a safer and more secure and a more peaceful world? We have to start talking about peace, and how we achieve that. 

Dr. [Martin Luther] King Jr., and all of those who came before us, really talked about the fact that peace is not just the absence of war, it is the presence of justice. We have to really begin to look at what that means. And look back in the last 20 years and think about how we now move forward, lessons learned, and make sure that the investigations move forward to determine where that money was misspent, we owe taxpayers full accounting of what took place. We’ve lost over 2,400 brave troops. They’ve done everything in the world that we asked them to do, they served with honor. Now we need to take care of our veterans and all the issues they’re dealing with in terms of health, their families, and their economic security. It’s way past time to have brought them home and figured out a way to support development and diplomacy in Afghanistan without having a military footprint.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

Miami-Dade County Mayor Daniella Levine Cava speaks at a news conference.

Politics

Miami-Dade mayor Daniella Levine Cava on what the world has to learn from the Surfside condo collapse

Daniella Levine Cava, the mayor of Miami-Dade County in South Florida, talks about the experience of helping the public grieve one of the deadliest structural building failures in history.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram