Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Arizona state Rep. Raquel Terán working at her desk.
Arizona state Rep. Raquel Terán, at work in her office, called the number of voting bills introduced "extreme." (Photo by Amanda Becker)

Politics

The fight over voting rights comes to Arizona

Arizona, like Georgia, flipped in 2020. And like in Georgia, new rules on voting may be coming.

Amanda Becker

Washington Correspondent

Amanda Becker portrait

Published

2021-04-08 14:36
2:36
April 8, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

PHOENIX — As Arizona’s Republican-controlled state legislature weighs a series of bills that would impose new restrictions on when and how voters can cast ballots, voting rights advocates are hoping that backlash to a similar law passed in Georgia will help derail the proposals in the Western state.

Arizona is at the forefront of a nationwide Republican push to place new restrictions on voting in the form of additional identification requirements, shortened early voting windows and limits on how voters can return ballots. New measures could result in the most significant contraction of voting access in decades. 

The effort follows Democratic victories in newly minted political battlegrounds, most prominently Arizona and Georgia, that put President Joe Biden in the White House and flipped party control of the U.S. Senate. It also comes as former President Donald Trump continues to erroneously insist that massive voter fraud cost him the election, fueling concerns about voting irregularities among the Republican base. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Critics of the proposed restrictions, including Biden, say the bills are designed not to address election fraud but to suppress votes from Democratic-leaning constituencies such as communities of color. In his first presidential news conference, Biden likened the Republican proposals to a new version of the “Jim Crow” laws that existed before the Civil Rights Movement that blocked Black voters.

In a move that could come to define Biden’s presidency, Washington Democrats are trying to pass a sweeping voting rights bill, known as H.R.1 or the For the People Act, that would preempt some of the state proposals. But their party is largely on defense on the state level, including in Arizona, one of the 30 states where Republicans control both legislative chambers. It is also one of 23 states where Republicans not only control the legislature but hold the governor’s mansion, meaning any voting bill that passes is likely to be signed into law. 

Arizona state Rep. Raquel Terán, a Democrat, said in an interview that the sheer number of voting bills Republicans have introduced this session “feels extreme.” She attributes it in part to their party’s loss of a second U.S. Senate seat last year and the state backing a Democratic presidential candidate for the first time since 1996. Republican margins of power in both the state House and Senate also dwindled to just one seat, meaning if Republicans lose the support of a single lawmaker in either chamber it can stymie a bill’s chances.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“Either they want to show what their values are, to try to get votes, or they know this is the last session that they have because they’re on the verge of losing this power,” Terán said. 

“I think after the bill that was passed in Georgia, Arizona has been on everybody’s radar,” she added.

As of late March, 361 bills with restrictive provisions had been introduced in 47 statehouses, according to the Brennan Center for Justice, marking a 43 percent increase in just over a month. Texas now leads the country in sheer number, with 49 bills pending, followed by Georgia, which has 25, including the proposal that has already been signed into law. Arizona is on its heels with 23 bills, including a handful that could still receive a vote before the legislative session ends. 

Brennan Center’s Eliza Sweren-Becker said the unprecedented number of proposals to restrict voting this year is both a “backlash to historic turnout” in the 2020 election and a “reaction to the ‘browning’ of America.” “It’s not a coincidence that Georgia, Arizona and Texas are generally more racially diverse already than most of the rest of the states across the country, and they are becoming less White more quickly than most of the rest of the country,” she said.

Read more on voting

  • ‘This is the first litmus test’: Andrea Young of the ACLU of Georgia on corporations and voting rights
  • Sen. Amy Klobuchar thinks this is the time to pass major voting legislation
  • Georgia is the epicenter of the fight over how Americans can vote

Arizona was one of the earliest states to expand early voting via the use of mail-in ballots. In the 1990s, when Republicans typically controlled the state legislature and the governor’s mansion, Arizona shifted from “absentee” voting to early voting and laws were changed so that voters did not need to have a reason to request ballots ahead of an election instead of voting in person. In 2007, the Republican-controlled legislature approved the Permanent Early Voting Act (PEVL), a popular program that allows voters to remain permanently on a list to automatically receive mail-in ballots. In the 2012 presidential election, about 61 percent of Arizona voters cast early ballots; by the 2018 midterm elections, nearly 80 percent did, according to elections data.

As the state’s demographics shifted, with Latinx voters making up an increasing share of the electorate, Democrats began treating Arizona as a presidential swing state. In 2020, for the first time in the state’s history, the rate at which Democrats opted to cast early ballots was comparable to the rate at which Republicans did.

Now, in the halls of Arizona’s statehouse, it is only the offices of Democratic lawmakers that display the “I love PEVL” signs distributed by Progress Arizona. It was one of more than 30 organizations that sent a letter last week to Allstate Insurance, CVS pharmacies, Enterprise Rent-A-Car and Farmers’ Insurance — the top donors to sponsors of the restrictive voting bills, along with others that would criminalize some forms of protest and lessen police accountability, according to critics — saying the Republican proposals do not square with public statements the companies have made supporting democracy and racial justice. As of mid week, none had publicly responded. 

It’s part of an effort spanning several states to pressure corporations that embraced racial justice slogans during last summer’s protests to reject restrictive voting bills that could disproportionately hurt minority voters.

Delta Airlines and Coca-Cola, which are headquartered in Georgia, have struggled with how to handle public outcry over the voting law there, which gives voters less time to request absentee ballots and imposes new identification requirements, among other provisions. Major League Baseball moved its All-Star game from Atlanta to Colorado in protest. Progress Arizona executive director Emily Kirkland said it made clear that corporations are “important to the fight” to stop similar laws in places like Arizona, adding: “The world is watching.”

Republicans have decried critical reactions to the voting bills as yet another sign of so-called “cancel culture” and urged businesses not to get involved. Georgia Republican Gov. Brian Kemp warned corporate leaders not to “bow down” because it will “never be enough.” Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell told corporate executives this week to “stay out of politics” before clarifying that “they’re certainly entitled to be involved” but should “read the damn bill.”

Arizona’s legislature on Wednesday approved two election-related bills: One was a messaging bill rejecting H.R. 1, and the other will prohibit the use of private money to administer elections or register voters. Neither is significant enough to be included in the Brennan Center’s tally of proposed restrictive laws, but a handful of substantive proposals are still in the mix as lawmakers debate a state budget ahead of the legislative session’s end.

SB 1485 would make PEVL impermanent if a voter did not vote at least once every four years; SB 1713 would change identification requirements for individuals who vote by mail; and SB 1106, which has become a sort of catch-all vehicle, has a provision that would make it a felony for out-of-state voters who do not meet residency requirements to vote in a presidential election in Arizona. SB 1593, which would require mail-in ballots to be postmarked by the Thursday before an election, is technically still in play but its critics believe it likely does not have the Republican support to pass. Given one Republican “no” vote can sink a bill, voting-rights groups plan to keep the pressure on key lawmakers with phone campaigns. 

“Any given day they can bring those bills up — most of them are one step, or two steps away, from ending up on the governor’s desk,” said Alex Gulotta, the Arizona state director for All Voting is Local, a group that advocates for voting access.

Doug Ducey, Arizona’s Republican governor, has said he does not comment on pending legislation but is “interested” in the slate of proposals. 

Though dozens of other bills, including some of the most extreme, appear to be dead — one would have given lawmakers final review of election results; another would have required notarization of mail-in ballots — voting-rights advocates note the Arizona legislature has entered “striker season.” As Arizona lawmakers attempt to wrap up their work, they sometimes file strike-everything amendments that entirely replace a bill’s language. These striker bills mean at any point a rejected voting proposal could resurface and see a swift vote.

Arizona state Rep. John Kavanagh, a Republican who chairs the House elections committee, said his panel did not debate some bills considered too controversial. He questioned why a group of Arizona business leaders last week said the remaining proposals were an attempt to disenfranchise voters instead of saying the group “applauds Republicans for killing controversial election bills.” 

The push by Arizona Republicans to enact new laws to restrict voting predates the national effort inspired by the results of the 2020 election, though it has picked up steam since. Democratic state Rep. Athena Salman notes there was an uptick in proposed restrictions nearly immediately after the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. Holder, which invalidated the “preclearance” section of the 1965 Voting Rights Act. 

Before the decision, Arizona was among the states and localities with a history of race-based voter suppression that were required to clear changes to voting laws with the Justice Department before they could take effect. After the decision, dozens of voting laws were introduced in states previously covered by what was seen as the heart of the Civil Rights-era statute. 

“Now, since Shelby County, we don’t have any preclearance,” Salman said, listing voting laws that Arizona Republicans have proposed or passed in the years since, including one that is currently before the Supreme Court.

“This year, it’s open season,” she added.

Last month, conservative justices, who have a majority on the high court, indicated during oral arguments that they were receptive to upholding a 2016 Arizona law that limited who could return ballots on behalf of another voter and invalidated ballots cast in the wrong precinct. A lower court had deemed the law racially discriminatory. When the lawyer representing the Arizona Republican Party was asked why such ballots cast in the wrong precinct should not be counted, he said it could put them at a “competitive disadvantage.” Voting rights advocates worry that the Supreme Court’s ruling in the case has the potential to further erode the Voting Rights Act’s protections.  

Opponents of the Arizona voting bills say some will likely have a disproportionate impact on specific voting groups, such as those living in remote areas of the Navajo Nation, where many members’ first language is not English but Diné. The bill that would require voters returning mail-in ballots to include their driver’s license or voter number as a form of additional identification adds a hurdle for voters without driver’s licenses, who tend to be lower-income individuals or racial minorities.

Kavanagh rejected arguments that those still under consideration were designed in any way to be discriminatory. “To suggest that the measures we’re talking about disproportionately burden minorities is frankly insulting to minorities, it’s like saying they’re not capable of responding to a letter … or they don’t vote as frequently as non-minorities,” he said in an interview.

“Our motivation is to stop election fraud,” he said. 

Critics of the voting bills say they are largely in the dark about if and when specific proposals will come up for a final vote. Arizona’s legislative session technically ends on April 24 but will continue until lawmakers approve a state budget.

“We’re at a time of uncertainty — mile 16 in the marathon, or maybe 18, we still have awhile to go — where on any given day something could come forward and it could pass,” Gulotta said. 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Tishaura Jones addresses her supporters during her mayoral victory.

Politics

What Tishaura Jones’ mayoral win says about the political power of Black women

Tishaura Jones became the latest with a Tuesday win to become the first Black woman mayor of St. Louis.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram