Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact
Donate
Home

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Topics

  • Abortion
  • Politics
  • Education
  • LGBTQ+
  • Caregiving
  • Environment & Climate
  • Business & Economy
View all topics

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

  • Latest Stories
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Ways to Give
  • Search
  • Contact

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Health

Trump directive ‘dangerously’ conflates gender-affirming care with a human rights violation

Groups that work to end female genital mutilation and cutting worry about an executive order that co-opts the policies they’ve worked to pass over nearly 30 years.

Screenshot of an executive order that reads "PROTECTING CHILDREN FROM CHEMICAL AND SURGICAL MUTILATION"

Jasmine Mithani

Interim Data and Technology Reporter

Published

2025-02-14 05:00
5:00
February 14, 2025
am

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Republish this story

A network working to end female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) in the United States and globally says President Donald Trump’s January 28 executive order attempting to restrict gender-affirming care for transgender youth “wrongly and dangerously” conflates the two.

Opponents of transgender rights have sought for several years to co-opt anti-FGM/C laws to further gender-affirming care bans, mostly in state legislatures. The executive order builds on these efforts by directing the Department of Justice and state authorities to review and prioritize the enforcement of laws banning FGM/C, which are unrelated. 

FGM/C is a human rights violation and one of the most extreme forms of gender-based violence. According to the World Health Organization, FGM/C “comprises all procedures that involve partial or total removal of the external female genitalia, or other injury to the female genital organs for non-medical reasons.” It is practiced across many cultures and takes many forms, and is most commonly performed on young girls who are unable to consent. There are no health benefits to FGM/C, and it is more likely to cause medical complications.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

In contrast, gender-affirming genital surgeries like phalloplasty or metoidioplasty are medically necessary and done only with the consent of the patient. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health, the international body that publishes research-backed standards of care, does not recommend genital gender-affirming care surgeries for patients under 18. Extensive documentation from medical professionals is required for any medically necessary gender-affirming care surgery. 

It is estimated that in 2012, over half a million girls in the United States had either undergone FGM/C or were at risk based on the country of origin of their parents. Survivor advocates think the number could be much higher now.

FGM/C has been a federal crime since 1996. The law has been revised several times — most recently in 2020, when Trump signed the STOP FGM Act, which prevented defendents from using religious or cultural reasons to avoid prosecution. 

  • More from The 19th
    Protesters hold signs in front of the Supreme Court that read
  • Trump directs federal government to restrict access to gender-affirming care for youth
  • The 19th Explains: What to know about executive orders as Trump takes office
  • On day one, Trump pits his administration against transgender people

Forty-one states also ban FGM/C, and the laws vary, said Mariya Taher, the co-founder and executive of Sahiyo, the most prominent nonprofit dedicated to eliminating FGM/C domestically. Only a few states have comprehensive legislation, including civil remedies for survivors, education outreach and law enforcement training. Among them is Massachusetts. Taher worked for seven years to pass that law, and is now advocating for a similar bill in Connecticut. “You need to do more than just make it illegal,” she said. 

The potential weaponization of anti-FGM/C laws against transgender people has been on the radar for U.S. advocates for several years, Taher said, because they have seen attempts made on the state level. 

Anti-trans extremists have warped these laws to ban health care for trans people “despite clear medical and ethical distinctions,” said Ash Lazarus Orr, press relations manager at Advocates for Trans Equality. Orr also pointed out that this rhetoric excludes non-consensual surgeries performed on intersex youth. Many bans include a carve-out ensuring “corrective” surgeries remain legal for minors with intersex characteristics.

Republican lawmakers in Idaho and Texas introduced bills in 2022 that would remove the word “female” from current legal codes banning FGM/C. Anti-FGM/C advocates helped defeat those bills, but Idaho ended up passing a separate law banning gender-affirming care for transgender youth the next year.

Excluding the word “female” means these laws no longer prevent FGM/C because they then refer to something else entirely, said Kaitlin Mitchell, policy and advocacy coordinator at the U.S. Network to End FGM/C. Using the laws to restrict gender-affirming care instead of addressing the specific issue they were designed to make it harder for advocates to campaign for more funding or research on this little-known, severe form of gender-based violence.

All the activists The 19th spoke with emphasized the importance of doing no harm to the transgender community while working to combat FGM/C. This is important too because not all survivors of FGM/C are cisgender women.

Several groups hosted a briefing at the Connecticut legislature in January 2024 to discuss the importance of a state law against FGM/C. A local conservative “pro-family” advocacy group took the opportunity to conflate FGM/C and gender-affirming care for minors, falsely saying that the state was paying for the “genital mutilation of minors.” The group called attention to six cases in which patients with Medicaid or CHIP received procedures coded as mastectomies — nothing to do with genitals.

“The legal definitions of FGM/C inherently exclude” gender-affirming care, wrote Anastasia Law, the program officer for North America at Equality Now, a feminist organization supporting the rights of women and girls worldwide. “FGM/C is non-consensual and without any medical purpose, whereas [gender-affirming care] is provided with robust informed consent processes and for recognized medical purposes,” she continued.

The U.S. Network to End FGM/C, where Mitchell works, released a statement last week condemning the executive order. “Any attempt to shift focus away from protecting girls from FGM/C, preventing this specific violence, and providing services to those affected by FGM/C, especially for political purposes, is misguided and extremely harmful,” it reads.

Activists aren’t the only people fighting back against Trump’s directive to use FGM/C laws to prevent gender-affirming care. Fourteen Democratic attorneys general issued a statement February 5 saying there is no connection between the two.

“As state attorneys general, we stand firmly in support of healthcare policies that respect the dignity and rights of all people,” the statement reads. “Health care decisions should be made by patients, families, and doctors, not by a politician trying to use his power to restrict your freedoms.”

Republish this story

Share

  • Bluesky
  • Facebook
  • Email

Recommended for you

Trump directs federal government to restrict access to gender-affirming care for youth
A pride flag is seen in front of the White House.
White House says it opposes gender-affirming surgery for minors
Gov. Doug Ducey gives his state of the state address at the Arizona Capitol.
Arizona’s anti-trans bills meet resistance among Republicans
Little boy sitting on a hospital bed coloring a book.
Intersex surgery is condemned by the United Nations. Anti-trans bills are allowing it.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Please complete the following CAPTCHA to be confirmed. If you have any difficulty, contact [email protected] for help.

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please email [email protected] to subscribe.

This email address might not be capable of receiving emails (according to Bouncer). You should try again with a different email address. If you have any questions, contact us at [email protected].

Become a member

Explore more coverage from The 19th
Abortion Politics Education LGBTQ+ Caregiving
View all topics

Support representative journalism today.

Learn more about membership.

  • Transparency
    • About
    • Team
    • Contact
    • Privacy Policy
    • Community Guidelines
  • Newsroom
    • Latest Stories
    • 19th News Network
    • Podcast
    • Events
    • Careers
    • Fellowships
  • Newsletters
    • Daily
    • Weekly
    • The Amendment
    • Event Invites
  • Support
    • Ways to Give
    • Sponsorship
    • Republishing
    • Volunteer

The 19th is a reader-supported nonprofit news organization. Our stories are free to republish with these guidelines.