Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: Who will be most impacted by Medicaid changes — and when

        Rebekah Barber · March 28
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Portrait of Dr. Caitlin Bernard looking at the camera with a slight smile.
Dr. Caitlin Bernard photographed in Indianapolis in September 2022. (Kaiti Sullivan/The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Abortion

She made headlines for providing abortion care to a 10-year-old. Now she’s fighting to protect patient privacy.

A judge will decide if the Indiana attorney general who is investigating Dr. Caitlin Bernard can seek her patient records.

Jennifer Gerson

Reporter

Jennifer Gerson headshot

Published

2022-11-22 15:14
3:14
November 22, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Weeks after Roe v. Wade was overturned, Dr. Caitlin Bernard made national headlines when she disclosed that she had provided an abortion to a 10-year-old girl who had been raped. That attention landed Bernard in the middle of an investigation by Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita into whether she properly documented the abortion and if she violated privacy laws. Now a judge will decide whether Rokita can seek other patients’ medical records as part of the investigation.

Monday night concluded the second part of an emergency hearing scheduled to determine whether Bernard will be granted a preliminary injunction to block Rokita from continuing to subpoena medical records from Bernard and her medical partner as part of his ongoing investigation into her. Rokita’s investigation continues even after Bernard proved that she had properly documented the abortion and that she had not violated patient privacy laws when she told reporters about the 10-year-old. 

In a statement after testifying Monday, Bernard said, “As a physician, I never imagined that I would be in the position to engage in a legal fight to protect the rights of women and girls to not have their private medical records released for political purposes. But nonetheless, I feel strongly that this fight — the fight for physicians to compassionately provide abortion care to every single person who needs their care and their patients to access safe, legal abortion care, free from fear of criminalization — is worth waging.”

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The judge’s decision, expected next week, will conclude whether Rokita can use what Bernard alleges are fraudulent complaints to continue the investigation. If Rokita is blocked, it would bar his office from using such complaints to investigate other medical providers.

  • More like this
    An ultrasound machine sits next to an exam table in an examination room at an Indiana abortion clinic.
  • Indiana doctor performed abortion for a 10-year-old girl, document shows
  • Indiana becomes first state to pass abortion ban after Roe v. Wade reversal
  • How Indiana’s abortion ban maintained rape and incest exceptions

Earlier this month, Bernard and her medical partner filed suit against Rokita in Indiana’s Marion County. The suit claims that the consumer protection complaints that have been filed against Bernard — the foundation of Rokita’s investigation into her — are from individuals who have never interacted with her personally. In Bernard’s filing of her suit against Rokita, her legal team outlines that seven complaints were filed against Bernard between July 8 and 12 of this year. Excerpts from the complaints show that they were not filed by patients of Bernard’s or Indiana residents.

The consumer protection statute in Indiana applies to only consumers from the state who have acquired a good or service within the state. These out-of-state complaints, according to Bernard’s suit, should not be allowed to serve as a basis for any kind of consumer protection investigation. 

In a statement issued the day after the emergency hearing concluded, Rokita justified the ongoing investigation into Bernard. 

“If the doctor did not choose to use her patient, a 10-year-old rape victim, to further her own political agenda, we would not be here today. There is no defensible reason for this doctor to shatter her 10-year-old patient’s trust by divulging her abortion procedure to a reporter so her traumatizing experience could be used in the polarizing abortion debate on the heels of Dobbs,” Rokita said in the statement.

But Bernard’s legal team believes it is Rokita politicizing health care. “Here we have the attorney general going on Fox News, saying a bunch of things about Dr. Bernard, and are now having people from all across the country filing complaints who have never met Dr. Bernard and have never purchased any goods or services from her. They are not, by definition, consumers,” Bernard’s attorney Kathleen DeLaney told The 19th. 

DeLaney said it’s unfair to patients who have not consented to having their private health information reviewed by the state. “These are people with no connection to these patients, and the attorney general is using these third-party complaints as an excuse or justification to go after the most personal documents you can imagine,” DeLaney said.

Last week, Bernard’s lawyers also filed for an emergency injunction to ban Rokita’s office from continuing their investigation of her and from starting any future related investigations while they await a judgment on the case. 

Nicole Huberfeld, a professor specializing in health law at Boston University, explained that subpoenaing medical records from Bernard’s patients butts up against laws that have recognized the confidentiality between doctors and patients. Legal precedent has held that exceptions to this confidentiality need to be clear-cut: things like public health surveillance in light of an infectious disease outbreak in a given community. Huberfeld also pointed out that past attempts to create exemptions related to abortion have not held up in court, such as in 2003’s case of Aid for Women v. Foulston, when Kansas’ then-attorney general made it mandatory to report all sexual activity among minors under the age of 16. That would have meant that abortion providers would need to report abortions performed on minors to the state or face liability of being in violation of child abuse reporting laws. The Kansas Supreme Court blocked the interpretation. 

“At the end of the day, the court said, ‘No you can’t use general laws to create exemptions to the rule that medical information is private and confidential,’” Huberfeld said, adding that consumer protection laws are not designed to be applied in a health care setting, a field that is already highly regulated. 

“Consumer protection laws … do not appropriately apply to patient-provider relationships, and using these broad consumer protection laws on that relationship that is already so heavily regulated is a poor fit, and opens the door to revealing confidential medical information unnecessarily,” Huberfeld said.

Tanya Washington, a law professor at Georgia State University, said that state officials and medical providers across the country will all be closely watching how Bernard’s suit moves through the legal system. Attorney generals in other states could try to utilize things like consumer protection laws to put a chilling effect on abortion providers. And providers will be watching to see what legal tools are available to them to fight back against threats or harassment from their own state attorney generals. 

“I’m glad to see Dr. Bernard challenging this exercise of authority because I think we need to define the authority of our elected officials and state officials in the context of this dynamic legal landscape, because there are so many gray areas now,” Washington said. “We need to know when overreach is occurring and how to combat it. It’s these kinds of lawsuits that are going to help us get more definition around where the guard rails are for attorney generals and other state officials when they exercise their authority in a way that jeopardizes patient privacy and also interferes with the rights of medical providers who are regulated and licensed to practice their discipline and provide much-needed care.” 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Washington said she will also be curious to see the ways in which Bernard’s suit speaks to state sunshine laws, particularly how they will be used and interpreted when involving private citizens in enforcing state laws. Bernard’s suit and Monday’s hearing for an emergency injunction raises the question, Washington said, of how “much protection do patients have and how much protection do medical professionals have when either state officials or deputized citizens are seeking to investigate the practice of reproductive health care.” 

It remains to be seen whether attorneys general in other states hostile to abortion access will turn to consumer protection laws as a new avenue for creating additional barriers to abortion. 

“If any patient knew that their medical records could be reviewed by the state because of a person unrelated to them with a political agenda filing a complaint, that will affect how much patients feel comfortable confiding in doctors, to be honest with their providers about what’s affecting their health,” DeLaney said. “They will be reluctant to have open and candid conversations.”

DeLaney said she imagines the chilling effect could go beyond that, though, if the utilization of third-party consumer protection complaints is allowed to be used for state investigatory review of patient medical records. “Doctors will be worried about what they put in the chart if it can end up in the hands of politicians. The implications for the future of standards of medical care are very significant. Why should we think they will stop at abortion.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

A volunteer places a door tag in support of Proposal 3 on a door. The tag read

Election 2022

Support for abortion measures was greater than support for Democratic candidates in some states

Pro-abortion rights ballot measures outperformed Democrats on the ballot in three states, while Republican politicians ran ahead of failed anti-abortion ballot measures in two states. 

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram