Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Abortion rights activists march past the Washington Monument as they protest in Washington, DC, on June 26, 2022. Samuel Corum/AFP via Getty Images

Abortion

After slow response, Biden administration ramps up abortion access protections

The administration sued Idaho and signed an executive order related to interstate travel. The 19th asked experts what more could be done. 

Mariel Padilla

General Assignment Reporter

Mariel Padilla portrait

Published

2022-08-05 12:06
12:06
August 5, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

After a relatively subdued response to the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, the Biden administration had a busy week in reproductive rights policy. The executive office made several moves to protect abortion access across the country and delay state restrictions. Some lawmakers continued to urge the president to do more — but legal and policy experts acknowledge there might not be much more the executive branch can do to shore up abortion access as states move to pass their own laws, courts rule on the constitutionality of those laws and the U.S. Congress works to pass its own legislation. 

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit Tuesday against Idaho on the grounds that its abortion ban, set to take effect on August 25, violated federal law. That same day, Kansas, the first state to bring the question of abortion access directly to the electorate, voters showed up at the polls to protect abortion access,  prompting President Joe Biden to quickly issue a statement in support and call on Congress to “listen to the will of the American people and restore the protections of Roe as federal law.” On Wednesday, Biden signed an executive order to help people seeking abortions cross state lines during the first meeting of the Interagency Task Force on Reproductive Healthcare Access,which Biden had assembled through a previous order. 

Several experts told The 19th that the administration took “meaningful steps” but acknowledged the limitations the president faces in renewing or even preserving reproductive rights. Helen Silverstein, head of the government and law department at Lafayette College, said that the administration’s actions this week were notable because they sent a clear — if delayed — signal to the Democratic base that the executive branch is taking access to reproductive health care seriously. On July 8, two weeks after the Supreme Court overturned Roe, Biden issued an executive order outlining actions his administration would take to protect health care services — some of which are coming to fruition nearly one month later. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“What seemed to be slow movement in the immediate aftermath of Dobbs on the part of the Biden administration was disheartening to pro-choice advocates and people in the Democratic Party who really strongly support abortion rights and reproductive justice issues,” Silverstein said. “And so the fact that steps are now being taken provides some optimism to those who were hoping that the administration would lead more forcefully on the issue.”

  • More abortion coverage
    Emergency entrance at urban hospital at dusk with lighted sign, Kootenai Health hospital in Coeur d'Alene Idaho
  • The Justice Department sues Idaho over its abortion ban, citing ‘medical emergency’ violation
  • Kansas voters reject effort to eliminate state abortion protections
  • Few abortion bans have fetal anomaly exceptions — even when ‘carrying a child you know is going to die’

One of the Biden administration’s strategies, experts said, is to delay abortion bans for as long as possible by bringing lawsuits and challenging state legislation. Anne Douds, chair of the public policy program at Gettysburg College, wasn’t optimistic that the president’s actions would make a significant impact but conceded that not much else could be done before the midterms. It’s Congress that can pass laws, Douds said, and it’s voters that will decide in several months who will be a part of that process. 

“The Biden administration is trying to hang on with whatever limited powers they can use until hopefully in November people vote on the issue and we have sufficient numbers in Congress to make a path forward that codifies abortion protections,” Douds said. 

Douds said the Kansas election, in which Kansans rejected a constitutional amendment that would have said abortion was not a protected right in the state, was a “good harbinger” of what could come during the midterms if the issue of reproductive rights drives large numbers of people to the polls. 

Melissa Murray, a law professor at New York University, agreed that the Biden administration could have been “more assertive in communicating outrage” with daily updates on new restrictions across the country or more consistent denunciation of the Supreme Court’s decision. But Murray pushed back on the idea the president was too slow in acting. 

“They’re sort of doing everything can, recognizing that things you do in the context of abortion may have really profound implications in other areas,” Murray said. 

Last month, Biden said he was weighing whether to declare abortion access a public health emergency after calls to do so from his party. The declaration would give the administration more flexibility to reallocate funding, personnel and resources. In 2022, national public health emergencies have been declared because of monkeypox, COVID-19 and the opioid crisis. Murray argued that even if Biden were to declare a public emergency, it would likely be challenged and eventually struck down by the Supreme Court, impacting every future president’s ability to respond to emergencies. 

“It’s not easy to focus solely on the question of reproductive rights,” Murray said. “These questions have tentacles that go beyond reproductive rights and could ostensibly, if decided by a hostile body, have real ramifications for just how government works. And that could be a real problem.” 

There’s no silver bullet, and the administration must tread carefully, she said.

Members of a task force on reproductive rights sit together for a meeting at The White House.
U.S. President Joe Biden, appearing via teleconference, delivers remarks at a meeting of the Task Force on Reproductive Healthcare Access during an event at the White House complex August 3, 2022 in Washington, DC. Abortion rights advocates achieved a victory yesterday in Kansas when voters rejected a proposed constitutional amendment that would have allowed state legislators to ban or significantly restrict abortion. (Win McNamee/Getty Images)

The “most impactful effort,” according to Murray, was this week’s lawsuit against Idaho. She said it was smart to invoke the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) in a suit that can easily be replicated for other states and it was a “genius” move to file it in Idaho, which is under the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, long considered a liberal stronghold for its majority of Democratic appointees. 

Passed by Congress in 1986, EMTALA requires all emergency departments that receive Medicare funds to treat emergency medical conditions regardless of a patient’s insurance status or ability to pay. U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced on Tuesday the United States was filing a lawsuit against Idaho because its trigger law, which criminalizes physicians for performing abortions, might incentivize medical professionals to withhold emergency medical treatment to pregnant people. Garland also cited the Supremacy Clause in the constitution, noting that federal law takes precedence over state laws when there is a conflict. 

Meanwhile, Democratic lawmakers are asking for further action. Democratic Sens. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii and Tammy Baldwin of Wisconsin sent a letter to the heads of the Departments of Health and Human Services, Veterans Affairs, Justice and Homeland Security, urging them to use their authority to make medication abortion more accessible. The senators said they were encouraged by Biden’s executive order last month that promised to try to protect access to medication abortion, but provided seven concrete recommendations they wanted the departments to pursue. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“As states escalate bans and restrictions on abortion, there is more urgency than ever to take immediate steps to expand access to medication abortion,” Warren, Hirono and Baldwin wrote. “We support your efforts to take all possible actions to protect abortion access.” 

The senators called on the federal government to: bring lawsuits to states that are denying patients access to FDA-approved medications; expedite an FDA review process to help make medication abortion more accessible sooner; declare a public health emergency; enhance state Medicaid programs to ensure access to medication abortion; add a miscarriage indication to medication labels; eliminate barriers to importation; and expand access to medication abortion for veterans. 

In the interim, Murray said the abortion rights movement could learn something from the anti-abortion strategy: focus on state legislatures, focus on the courts, focus on the district attorney races to decide whether these bans will be enforced. 

“We’re not going to win back Roe v. Wade in two months,” Murray said. “I may not live to see the restoration of abortion rights, and I think people have to sit with that right now. It took the conservatives 40 years to undo this, and it may take us just as long — maybe longer — to restore it.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

A group of three women walk on a crowded street.

Politics

‘Our freedoms are under attack’: Women express hopelessness about the state of the country

The 19th was granted exclusive access to listen in on discussions with a group of women who identify as Democrats or soft partisans. These were their concerns.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram