Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Sunset light illuminates the U.S. Supreme Court building.
Sunset light illuminates the U.S. Supreme Court building. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images)

Abortion

The 19th Explains: Texas’ six-week abortion ban is still stuck in court. Here’s why.

Despite a December ruling allowing legal challenges to proceed, the abortion law remains in effect. Where do things currently stand? And where will they go next? 

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2022-01-04 15:13
3:13
January 4, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Abortion providers challenging Texas’ six-week abortion ban have asked that the Supreme Court send their case to a district judge, a critical follow-up to a December ruling that could effectively end any challenges to the law. 

Because of the law’s unique structure — rather than criminalizing abortion, it allows private citizens to sue anyone who helps someone end a pregnancy at six weeks or later — the state of Texas argued before the Supreme Court that the abortion ban did not fall within the purview of federal courts and could not be legally challenged.

On December 10, the Supreme Court held that state abortion providers could challenge the law in court — but narrowly, in a way that experts say could ultimately offer little if any meaningful recourse — and sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, where it has been, unmoving, ever since. Abortion providers are now asking for the Supreme Court to move the case along. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The court did not issue any kind of injunction blocking the abortion law, and the new filing represents an effort to change that. But it is widely considered a long shot, and it comes after weeks of delay. Despite the court’s ruling, the Texas abortion ban remains in effect. 

Where do things currently stand? And where will they go next? 

Where is the Texas case now? 

There are two federal courts with jurisdiction over the Texas case, known as Whole Woman’s Health v. Jackson. The first is a district court in Austin, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas. The second is the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, a conservative appeals court that typically weighs in after the district court does.  

Whole Woman’s Health, one of Texas’ largest abortion providers, had asked the Supreme Court to remand the case to the district court, which is considered friendlier toward the abortion providers’ legal challenge. The presiding judge in Austin, Robert Pitman, has previously ruled against the law, Senate Bill 8, issuing an injunction last fall that temporarily blocked it. If given the opportunity to do so, he is expected to make a similar decision in this case.

But so far, he has not had the chance to weigh in. 

The state of Texas had argued that, instead of returning to the district court, the case should be remanded to the 5th Circuit, which has previously found in favor of the Texas law, and is considered one of the most conservative appeals courts in the country. On December 16, Supreme Court Justice Neil Gorsuch, who authored the court’s December 10 ruling, issued an order doing so.

What question is the appeals court considering? 

In its December 10 ruling, the Supreme Court’s conservative majority held that providers challenging Texas’ abortion law could only sue a narrow class of defendants: the state’s health licensing boards, who could punish medical professionals for providing abortions after six weeks. 

Texas officials have said that even licensing boards should not be sued, arguing that they don’t play any role in enforcing the Texas law. That is the specific question before the 5th Circuit, which has a hearing set for January 7. The 5th Circuit would also assess what role Texas’ state Supreme Court plays in litigating the abortion law. 

If the appeals court decides that Texas’ licensing boards do not help enforce the Texas law — and therefore cannot be sued — it could put an end to any legal challenges attempting to block SB 8. 

That’s because in its December 10 ruling, the Supreme Court held that abortion providers could not sue other state officials, mainly court clerks, despite their potential role in processing civil lawsuits, the threat of which have effectively ended access to most abortions in Texas. 

On Monday night, Whole Woman’s Health asked the Supreme Court to intervene. They argued that there is no meaningful question the appeals court needs to resolve, because the Supreme Court has already said licensing boards can be sued under the law, and said the 5th Circuit should instead hand off the case to the district court in Austin. 

And they expressed concern that further delays in processing — especially if the state supreme court must be involved — could imperil pregnant people in Texas seeking abortions. 

“With a clear majority of this Court having held that the case may proceed past the motion-to-dismiss stage, the Fifth Circuit has no issues left to resolve on the appeal,” the request said. 

What happens next?

Whole Woman’s Health has asked the Supreme Court to respond quickly, but there is no guarantee as to when they will answer the request or what they will say. 

The form of petition the providers have filed — what’s known as a writ of mandamus — is not often granted. The Supreme Court must agree that the providers have been denied a legal right by someone who has abstained from performing their duty. In this case, the court would have to agree that the 5th Circuit’s has taken unnecessary delays in acting that have denied abortion providers the rights guaranteed by the December 10 ruling.

In the meantime, abortions after six weeks remain inaccessible in Texas. Research from last fall shows that abortions performed in Texas declined precipitously after the law took effect, though more recent data is not yet available. 

Meanwhile, many people seeking abortions any later in pregnancy traveled to surrounding states — such as Oklahoma, Louisiana, Kansas and New Mexico — to obtain care. But that journey is unaffordable for many, particularly those who don’t have paid time away from work, access to a car or guaranteed child care. And clinics in neighboring states reported that they did not have enough medical providers or other resources to meet the increased demand for abortions. 

Is there a time limit for a response?

There isn’t a deadline for when the Supreme Court has to respond, or when lower courts need to move forward with the Texas case. But longer delays mean more people unable to access abortions when they become pregnant. And legally, the situation is changing quickly.

On December 1, the Supreme Court heard arguments in another major abortion case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health. 

In that case, examining a Mississippi law that would ban abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, the court considered overturning Roe v. Wade in its entirety, eliminating any federal protection to abortion. During oral arguments for that case, a majority of conservative justices appeared open to such a decision. 

A ruling in the Dobbs case is expected in June or July. And if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned, it would be far easier for a lower court to uphold the Texas abortion law. Even if not, Texas — along with 20 other states — has other laws on the books that would effectively end legal abortions in the absence of a federal protection.

Some legal observers expect the courts to delay a decision on the Texas case until the Supreme Court rules on Dobbs.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

From the Collection

The 19th Explains

People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
  • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

    Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

    Kate Sosin · December 8
  • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

    Mariel Padilla · December 1

Up Next

Demonstrators hold boxes of abortion pills in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Abortion

FDA permanently allows medication abortion pills through mail

The Thursday announcement upholds a decision from April to temporarily suspend federal requirements that had previously required in-person purchase of abortion pills from a clinic, hospital or medical office.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram