Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
      • U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik wants to elect more Republican women into office

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 13
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
      • Meet J. Michelle Childs, South Carolina judge and possible Supreme Court contender

        Candice Norwood · February 18
      • ‘The bench is loaded’: A record number of Latinas are running for governor

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 11
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: The governor’s races we’re watching in 2022

        Barbara Rodriguez · May 3
      • The 19th Explains: What to know about Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing

        Candice Norwood, Terri Rupar · March 21
      • The 19th Explains: Colleges are dropping the SAT in admissions. That’s a good thing for most girls.

        Nadra Nittle · March 3
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
      • Girls are being socialized to lose political ambition — and it starts younger than we realized

        Barbara Rodriguez · September 23
      • Kathy Hochul’s rise in New York spotlights the barriers to women becoming governors

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 23
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
      • LGBTQ+ seniors fear having to go back in closet for the care they need

        Sara Luterman · October 12
      • The pandemic continues to strain nursing homes. What happens if a lot of them close?

        Mariel Padilla · September 9
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Donate to get our member newsletter

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A newborn baby
(Getty Images)

Abortion

What are safe haven laws, and why did they come up in a Supreme Court case on abortion?

Justice Amy Coney Barrett asked about safe haven laws and their ability to relieve the burden of parenting.

Sara Luterman

Caregiving reporter

Sara Luterman, The 19th

Published

2021-12-08 08:53
8:53
December 8, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

During last week’s Supreme Court oral arguments on Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization — a case that could have an outsize impact on abortion access in the country — Justice Amy Coney Barrett repeatedly asked about safe haven laws, or policies that allow parents to surrender their children soon after birth without negative legal consequences. 

She presented safe haven laws as a way to alleviate the “burdens of parenting” and “obligations of motherhood” discussed in Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that guaranteed the constitutional right to an abortion. “Why don’t the safe haven laws take care of that problem?” Barrett asked during oral arguments. 

Barrett could have gleaned the idea from Mississippi’s request for the court to hear the case. The filing argues that because there are laws addressing issues like pregnancy discrimination and family leave that “facilitate the ability of women to pursue both career success and a rich family life,” they are no longer burdened in the way that they were when Roe was decided. The filing presents safe haven laws as another legal development that challenges the premises of previous rulings on abortion. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Advocates for safe haven laws, with a variety of personal viewpoints on abortion, were surprised to hear them discussed in a case about abortion or as a way to reduce the burden of parenting. Their use is extraordinarily rare: Only a handful of babies are relinquished through them every year. Other forms of relinquishment — fostering and adoption, the latter of which was also brought up by Barrett — are more widely used. Safe haven laws are seen as harm reduction measures for parents in the most desperate of circumstances. 

Anthony Michael Kreis, an assistant professor of law at Georgia State University, argues that Barrett’s view ignores the risks of pregnancy itself, physical and mental. 

“There’s health care costs. There’s the emotional toll. … The assumption that [relinquishing a baby] is all rainbows, sunshine and butterflies because we have [safe haven laws] … makes no sense,” he said. “People don’t just drop a child off and go on with their lives.”

A newsletter you can relate to

Storytelling that represents you, delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

The first American safe haven law was enacted in 1999, but the concept of anonymously, legally surrendering a child is much older than that. In fact, it can be traced back to ancient Rome, if not earlier, according to Dr. Sara McDougall, an associate professor of history at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. 

“You would abandon a child and hope someone found it. There was no stigma. You didn’t have to be private about it,” McDougall, who has written extensively on the history of abortion, adoption and infanticide, told The 19th.

The arrival of Christianity in the first century shifted attitudes in Rome significantly, however. Church leaders argued that if a child is abandoned, effort should be made to ensure the child does not die from exposure. The survival of the infant had not been prioritized or especially considered in ancient Rome. This concern was present at the highest echelons of the Catholic Church. According to legend, Pope Innocent III dreamt that fishermen drew drowned infants out of the Tiber River in their nets. He institutionalized “foundling wheels” in Italy in 1198. Using a foundling wheel, an infant in a crib could be set in the opening of a church or hospital. Then, a wooden wheel would be rotated so that the abandoned child would be moved inside and not left exposed. Foundling wheels eventually spread throughout Europe.

After 13 infants were found in disturbing circumstances, three dead, Texas passed the country’s first safe haven law in 1999. The law allows new parents to leave infants with employees at designated safe places such as fire stations or hospitals. 

Safe haven laws now exist in all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico, but there are typically only a handful of cases per year, experts told The 19th. 

  • More from The 19th
    President Biden walks off stage after delivering remarks to the press.
  • Abortion rights advocates want to hear more from Joe Biden
  • When federal assistance for ‘daily living’ doesn’t include parenting
  • Women doctors are getting paid millions less than men, a new study suggests

Still, the laws are not without controversy. Nebraska’s safe haven law, which was passed in 2001, did not specify a maximum age for relinquishing children, and a spate of abandonments in 2008 sparked reform. In one case, a single father went to a hospital in Omaha and surrendered nine of his 10 children — who were between the ages of 1 and 17 — saying he could not care for them after his wife died. The law has since been reformed, and now specifies that only infants up to a month old may be surrendered without risk of arrest for abandonment. 

Safe haven laws are not generally presented as alternatives to abortion when advocates have pushed them forward. Instead, safe haven laws are intended to offer a safer option for new parents in extreme crisis, according to Monica Kelsey, a former volunteer firefighter and the founder of Safe Haven Baby Boxes. Those parents might otherwise leave an infant somewhere dangerous, like public restrooms, dumpsters or the side of the road, said Kelsey, who is also a national expert on safe haven laws. 

Safe Haven Baby Boxes, installed at fire stations and hospitals in six states, provide temperature-controlled, anonymous drop-off points — essentially, contemporary foundling wheels. When the hatch on the box is closed, Emergency Medical Services are notified immediately. Safe Haven Baby Boxes also operates a National Safe Haven Crisis line, which informs parents considering relinquishing new babies on the safest legal pathways.

“Women who chose to use safe haven laws have already chosen life for their child … An adoption plan is a better option. A parenting plan is a better option. [Relinquishing under a safe haven law] is only a good option if it’s the only option the mother has left,” Kelsey told The 19th. 

Kelsey describes herself on her website as a “pro-life speaker.” But she sees safe haven laws as a separate issue entirely. “My goal is that we give women every option available to them to utilize, to make a good choice for them and their baby,” Kelsey told The 19th. In 2018 she told US News: “This isn’t a pro-life or pro-choice issue. These children are alive, they’re living.”

Monica Kelsey poses with a baby box in front of a firetruck.
Monica Kelsey poses with a prototype of a baby box, where parents could surrender their newborns anonymously in February 2015. (Michael Conroy/AP)

Kreis shares Kelsey’s view of the law’s purpose and necessity. He helped reform initial problems in his state’s safe haven law. 

“[Georgia’s law] was very limited in terms of the places a parent could bring an infant. It also required the relinquishing parent to provide identifying information, which was a deterrent,” Kreis explained. For Kreis, who describes himself as “unabashedly pro-choice,” functional safe haven laws are part and parcel with gender equality. 

“I’ve always firmly believed that more options for women in bad situations are better,” he said. “In my ideal world, we have robust access to reproductive health care across the board for women. And those who find themselves in a position where they’ve just given birth to a child and don’t feel like they have an out, I think that’s an important measure to give, too,” Kreis said.

Many of Kreis’s colleagues in reforming the bill were anti-abortion, but he does not see that as evidence that safe haven laws have an anti-abortion purpose. He was outraged by Barrett questioning about safe haven laws at oral arguments. 

“I find [Barrett’s] invocation of safe haven laws to be obnoxious and egregiously offensive,” he told The 19th. “What the safe haven laws are supposed to do is help women who find themselves in a bad situation when it’s far too late. … The idea that you could just part with an infant, that’s not based in reality,” Kreis said.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Building stronger together.

A new model for nonprofit journalism: For our readers. For our team. For our community.

Become a member

Sign up for our newsletter

Up Next

President Biden walks off stage after delivering remarks to the press.

Abortion

Abortion rights advocates want to hear more from Joe Biden

With 50 years of abortion rights in the balance, some would like the president to use the bully pulpit — and say the word ‘abortion’ out loud.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram