Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

An abortion rights activist speaks outside the Supreme Court.
An abortion rights activist speaks outside the Supreme Court in protest against the Texas abortion law. (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

Abortion

The Supreme Court will hear arguments on Texas’ abortion law. Here’s what you need to know.

The unusual structure of Senate Bill 8 means that Monday’s arguments will not actually address the constitutional right to an abortion.

By

Shefali Luthra, Candice Norwood

Published

2021-11-01 05:56
5:56
November 1, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The Supreme Court will hear multiple challenges to Texas’ six-week abortion ban Monday, just weeks after it initially refused block the law from going into effect.

The court will hear two challenges to the Texas law, one from some of the state’s abortion providers and another from the federal Department of Justice. In both cases, the plaintiffs have argued that the Texas law violates the protections established by Roe v. Wade, the 1973 case that guaranteed the right to an abortion up until a fetus can independently live outside the womb, which typically happens around 24 weeks of pregnancy. The Texas law appears to violate those protections. 

But the unusual structure of Senate Bill 8 means that Monday’s arguments will not actually address the Roe v. Wade standard or the constitutional right to an abortion. Instead of criminalizing abortion after six weeks, the Texas law empowers private citizens to sue anyone who has provided “aid or abetment” in procuring such an abortion. A successful litigant would receive at least $10,000, and would have legal fees reimbursed. Since the law took effect, lawmakers from several other states have moved to introduce similar legislation. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Monday’s arguments will focus on this novel punishment structure.

In the case brought by the state’s abortion providers, the justices will weigh whether a scheme like Texas’ — which uses private enforcement to “insulate from federal-court review a law that prohibits the exercise of a constitutional right” — is in fact legal. And in the case brought by the federal government, the justices will address whether the Department of Justice actually has experienced harm as a result of the law, and whether it has the right to sue both to protect its own interests and to protect the broader rights of the American public. 

Texas is arguing that neither the federal government nor the abortion clinics in Texas have demonstrated they suffer harm as a result of the law. It is also arguing that the clinics, who are suing state officials tasked with carrying out lawsuits, are addressing the wrong defendants.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“This is a kind of flashback to cases of the civil rights movement when Black people demanded that the federal government intervene to protect their interests when states were refusing to abide by either federal legislation or Supreme Court jurisprudence,” said Michele Goodwin, a chancellor’s professor of law at the University of California, Irvine.

Because access to abortion is currently an established constitutional right, the federal government argues it has the authority to ensure that Texas does not evade that constitutional obligation by preventing SB 8’s enforcement from being challenged in federal courts.

In the past two months, the threat of costly lawsuits has limited abortion access in Texas, caused some clinics to stop providing abortions altogether, and drastically reduced people’s ability to successfully end a pregnancy without leaving the state. In September, only about 2,000 people in Texas were able to access an abortion — less than half the number of abortions done the previous month. Policy researchers expect the number to decline further if the law stays in effect. 

Already, the law’s private enforcement mechanism has helped the abortion ban evade legal scrutiny, including from the Supreme Court. 

In a September decision, the court declined an emergency petition to block the law from taking effect, suggesting that Texas’ abortion providershad identified the wrong defendants and that the the threat of harm was mainly theoeritcal, and that Texas’ abortion providers therefore did not have the legal right to challenge the ban. The decision had a 5-4 split, with Chief Justice John Roberts siding with the court’s three liberal justices.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor, one of the court’s leading liberals, blasted the decision.

“Presented with an application to enjoin a flagrantly unconstitutional law engineered to prohibit women from exercising their constitutional rights and evade judicial scrutiny, a majority of Justices have opted to bury their heads in the sand,” Sotomayor wrote in a dissent joined by the court’s two other liberal justices, Stephen Breyer and Elena Kagan.

Monday’s arguments may not directly address abortion rights. But its decision could still have dramatic implications for the future of access to the procedure. 

If, for instance, the court — which has six conservative justices, and previously declined to block the law— agrees with the state of Texas, that could still send a signal to other conservative states that the private enforcement mechanism offers a viable workaround to Roe v. Wade, Goodwin said.

Already, lawmakers in several states, including Florida, Arkansas and Mississippi, have indicated that they intend to introduce copycat abortion legislation based on the Texas ban. 

Private enforcement as a legal loophole could also extend to other types of legislation. Two laws signed this year use a similar method of citizen enforcement to target the rights of transgender people: One law in Tennessee allows a student, parent or employee to sue for monetary damages if school officials permit a transgender person to use the bathroom or locker room when others are inside. Another in Florida allows students to sue if a school allows a transgender girl or woman to play on a team with cisgender peers.

A decision on the Texas law could come within days, suggested attorneys at the Center for Reproductive Rights and the American Civil Liberties Union. But the Texas law is not the last time this term the court will address abortion rights. Another case is scheduled to be heard on December 1, examining the constitutionality of a 15-week ban on abortion, which was passed in Mississippi but has not taken effect. That case is widely seen as another chance for the court’s conservative wing to either weaken or eliminate abortion rights. 

Jennifer Gerson contributed reporting.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

Up Next

An ultrasound machine sits next to an exam table in an examination room.

Abortion

Abortion clinic wait times surge in states surrounding Texas

Texas patients could be straining capacity at the small number of abortion clinics near the state, a new report finds.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram