Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Justice Neil Gorsuch's arguments in Bostock v. Clayton helped preserve a lower court ruling on transgender students and bathroom use. (Photo by WIN MCNAMEE/GETTY IMAGES)

Justice

How conservative legal arguments paved the way for transgender rights

Even as Republican-controlled statehouses endanger trans rights, a different line of conservative thinking is bolstering them in the courts.

Orion Rummler

LGBTQ+ Reporter

Orion Rummler headshot

Published

2021-07-06 11:00
11:00
July 6, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The Supreme Court’s decision to preserve a ruling on Gavin Grimm’s right to use the school bathroom is an example of how conservative legal arguments have paved the way for major wins in the LGBTQ+ movement, especially for transgender rights, attorneys tell The 19th. 

The role of conservative legal thinking in upholding some transgender protections is emblematic of a philosophical divergence on the American right. Republican lawmakers have pitched a record number of bills restricting whether trans youth can access life-saving, gender-affirming health care and play on school sports teams. Amid all this, a few GOP governors and more seasoned Republican lawmakers have found themselves at odds with their own party over the necessity and morality of the bills, which have sometimes prompted families to relocate. 

At the courthouse level, the conclusion of the Grimm case drew from Bostock v. Clayton, a Supreme Court ruling that placed LGBTQ+ people firmly under the protections of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. As the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit weighed Grimm’s case, the ACLU filed a notice to draw the court’s attention to Bostock.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“Bostock was just the cherry on the top,” Joshua Block, the ACLU’s senior staff attorney, told the 19th. Block said he felt the Court of Appeals would probably still have ruled in Grimm’s favor without the legal support provided by Bostock, but it “certainly made a difference in the Supreme Court not taking the case,” Block said.

The reason that Bostock has staying power as a consequential victory for LGBTQ+ rights is that it uses language that appeals to conservative judges in a majority opinion penned by Justice Neil Gorsuch, said Ezra Ishmael Young, a civil rights attorney and founding board member of the National Trans Bar Association.

“I think Gorsuch was tactically smart,” Young told The 19th. “He wrote Bostock to speak to the people who were most unlikely to follow. I think that is part of why we’ve seen, holistically speaking, pretty wide compliance with Bostock.”

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

When Gorsuch wrote the court’s 6-3 opinion for Bostock, he wrote: “Those who adopted the Civil Rights Act might not have anticipated their work would lead to this particular result … But the limits of the drafters’ imagination supply no reason to ignore the law’s demands.”

He used precedent set by another famous conservative justice, the late Antonin Scalia, to make his case, Block said.

“A lot of the bad decisions interpreting Title VII to exclude LGBT people were made by courts in the ‘70s and early ‘80s, where it was all based on this idea of, ‘We look to legislative intent and there’s no proof in the legislative record that Congress intended to protect LGBT people,’” Block said.

“And Scalia came to the court and said intent doesn’t matter. We don’t guess about what’s in people’s heads, all that matters is the words that they wrote on paper. And that is exactly what Gorsuch said.” 

Gorsuch’s reasoning supported Grimm’s lower-court victory, but the justice’s work has applied differently in other decisions. Most recently, the court declined on Friday to hear an appeal from a Washington state florist who had refused service to a same-sex couple, but Gorsuch was among the minority of justices who wanted to hear the case.

The line of conservative thought that bolstered Grimm’s victory has not been as evident among elected officials, where major Republican voices are still the ones driving anti-trans rhetoric and legislation. 

Former President Donald Trump used his platform to push for barring trans women from sports, and state legislation pursuing that goal has been signed by potential 2024 presidential contenders like Govs. Kristi Noem of South Dakota and Ron DeSantis of Florida.

“The sweeping legislative attacks we’re seeing this year are the result of a perfect storm of media misinformation, anti-LGBTQ activism, and a lack of education around trans issues,” GLAAD spokesperson Mary Emily O’Hara said in an emailed statement. “Negative right-wing coverage of trans issues dominates the media landscape.”

Gov. Tate Reeves of Mississippi, before signing his state’s bill to exclude trans girls from sports that match their gender identity, blamed President Joe Biden for forcing the party’s hand on the issue by signing an executive order that extended Bostock’s holding to all federal laws that prohibit sex discrimination, including Title IX — which prohibits sex discrimination in schools.

  • More from The 19th
  • Supreme Court won’t rule on transgender bathroom access in schools
  • The 19th Explains: What did Title IX changes just do for trans students?
  • ACLU sues Arkansas over ban on gender-affirming health care

But the push in statehouses has met some resistance elsewhere as other Republicans take a look at what the government is asking of private citizens.

“Even conservative politicians and governors are not 100 percent on board with the idea that the state should be involved in regulating medical decisions that children are making in the context of their families and with medical advice,” said Alexander Chen, the founding director of the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic. 

Gov. Asa Hutchinson of Arkansas, a Republican who has worked in government for over three decades, vetoed his state’s bill criminalizing gender-affirming care for trans kids, denouncing it as an “extreme” government overreach. (His veto was overturned by legislators.) 

Hutchinson did sign two bills barring trans students’ participation in sports. He told Axios that he signed those measures knowing that though no trans student had posed an issue trying to compete, he felt the ramifications of the health bill were real and immediate.

Hutchinson’s willingness to voice his concerns on the health care bill feed into a broader issue worrying some transgender attorneys: Coalition-building with conservatives has been left out of the trans rights movement and the push for LGBTQ+ civil rights as a whole. 

Shannon Minter, legal director of the National Center for Lesbian Rights who has been representing LGBTQ+ rights cases for nearly 30 years, believes the movement to some degree has “fallen into positing conservative families as our enemy.”  

“We don’t engage, and we just criticize and even demonize people. We really can’t afford to do that here,” Minter said during a conversation in May on the record number of bills targeting trans youth.

Young, who during his postdoctoral program said he read all available recorded cases involving trans people (around 530 cases at the time), lamented LGBTQ+ advocates’ unwillingness to appeal to conservatives — and their tendency to lump all conservative judges in the same boat. 

“Not very many people are talking about it. I’d say it’s sort of against most people’s interests to admit it and many people just struggle to see it,” Young said. “A lot of the advocacy organizations, their media mouthpieces, it’s in their interests to scare people about what’s going on because that’s how they get fundraising,” he added.

But the Bostock ruling, coupled with the Supreme Court’s decision not to take up Grimm’s case, will make the landscape more difficult for the state legislatures rallying behind bills targeting trans youth, Carl Charles, a Lambda Legal staff attorney, told the 19th. 

“It makes it that much more difficult for them to demonstrate that these state laws that are being passed, or trying to be passed, are anything other than just pure animus,” he said, adding that Lambda Legal and other advocacy groups are actively working on lawsuits against some of the bills that have passed. Those fights will continue despite the Supreme Court’s decision to drop Grimm’s case, he said.

And conversations behind the scenes will continue. Alphonso David, the president of the Human Rights Campaign, stressed to the 19th that his advocacy group is working with elected officials and institutions across the aisle. 

“I don’t think it’s accurate to suggest that the work of engaging with those who disagree with us has stopped,” David said. “I don’t think the issue is about engaging conservatives or Republicans or religious leaders — it’s engaging people who don’t see our humanity.”

“And I think as we divide people into different classifications, we lose focus on what our job is. Our job is to make sure that we achieve the civil rights of LGBTQ people, regardless of what label you assign to the person who doesn’t see our humanity.” 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

Ashton Mota embraces Biden with an American flag beside them

LGBTQ+

White House to review interagency protections for transgender Americans

The Biden administration wants to address employment discrimination, homelessness and other issues that have a disproportionate effect on transgender people.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram