Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Dr. Rachel Levine speaking at a desk with a mask on.
Dr. Rachel Levine, the nation’s first transgender assistant secretary of health, told The 19th that the new rule marks a watershed moment. (Photo by Tom Brenner-Pool/Getty Images)

Health

Biden restores transgender ACA protections, ending Trump era of uncertainty

The change comes as many state legislatures are pushing restrictive anti-trans medical bills.

By

Shefali Luthra, Kate Sosin

Published

2021-05-10 12:11
12:11
May 10, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The Biden administration has restored sexual orientation and gender identity protections to the Affordable Care Act, a symbolic end to the constant threats to transgender health care under the Trump administration. And though it’s unclear what many of the immediate impacts will be, experts say the move signals support for trans health care protections.

Under this new guidance, organizations and providers that receive federal funding are barred from discriminating against someone for their sexual orientation or gender identity, protections that were axed under the Trump administration. LGBTQ+ advocates accused former President Donald Trump of weaponizing HHS against transgender Americans: In addition to getting rid of health care protections, the Trump administration moved to shield health care workers who had religious or moral objections from treating transgender patients and those with HIV. 

“Fear of discrimination can lead individuals to forgo care, which can have serious negative health consequences,” Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra said in a statement announcing the change Monday. “It is the position of the Department of Health and Human Services that everyone — including LGBTQ people — should be able to access health care, free from discrimination or interference, period.”

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Dr. Rachel Levine, the nation’s first transgender assistant secretary of health, told The 19th that the new rule marks a watershed moment.

“It was so difficult in the previous administration … even just the articulation of their interpretation — that it [the law] did not include LGBTQ people — that discriminating against us was legal in their opinion, was so disheartening,” she said.

The protections come at a time when more than 30 states are considering bills that would limit the rights of transgender youth, including gender-affirming medical care. Arkansas has already passed a bill that bars doctors from treating kids with gender dysphoria. Levine noted there “was a disconnect” now between federal law and “draconian” anti-trans medical bills moving through states. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Chase Strangio, deputy director for trans justice at the ACLU, praised the move as life-saving. 

“With health care for transgender youth under attack by state legislatures, this move to protect LGBTQ people from discrimination in health care is critical,” Strangio said in a statement.

It’s still unclear if or how the new HHS guidance could affect any of those state-based health care restrictions, or whether it might give Washington any tools to undercut those bans. But at a minimum, it sets a federal tone in contrast to what is emerging in many Republican-led statehouses and could foreshadow further legal action. 

“It’s a signal to LGBTQ Americans that someone wants to redress the harms they face in discrimination in health care settings,” said Katie Keith, a health law expert at Georgetown University, who has written extensively about this component of the ACA known as Section 1557.

Though often touted by the ACA’s supporters, the 1557 protections never fully took effect. They were initially introduced in 2016, thanks to an Obama administration rule that interpreted the ACA’s ban against sex discrimination in health care to also prohibit discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation. 

But the rule was almost immediately challenged in court and subsequently blocked by a Texas district judge. The court then vacated the rule, and the Trump administration issued regulations that would formally undo those protections. 

Now, HHS’ reinterpretation of the law — which coheres with a 2020 Supreme Court ruling Bostock v. Clayton — adds another avenue of protection. The new guidance means that people who face gender-identity discrimination in health care, whether from insurance or from their doctors, can file a complaint with the federal government to investigate without having to hire legal counsel. 

Already, many insurers and health care providers had moved toward improving health care protections and insurance for trans people. But holes remained, Keith said, and having a government ready to investigate anti-trans discrimination could make a meaningful difference.

“If you’re trying to think at the next generation of discrimination — really restrictive medical necessity criteria, where it says something is covered but it’s not — you need the complaints and investigation and data,” she said.

HHS will not go through a formal federal rule-making process to reinstate the protections. Robinsue Frohboese, acting director of the Office of Civil Rights at HHS, said the administration has consulted with the Department of Justice and Office of General Counsel, and believes that the Bostock ruling was sufficient basis for the rule. 

“We are in strong legal ground,” she said.

HHS also indicated its enforcement will comply with the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, which has often been used to justify health care exemptions for medical providers with religious objections. 

“I think it’s important to recognize that first, there has to be a substantial burden on religious exercise,” Frohboese added. “And second, that burden has to be justified by a compelling government interest that is being promoted by the means is least restrictive.” 

Meanwhile, the 2016 lawsuit that initially blocked 1557 from taking effect is still making its way through lower courts, making these new protections vulnerable.

Earlier this spring, the 2016 lawsuit was sent back to the same district court judge in Texas who initially blocked the protections. In this current appeal, the plaintiffs are arguing for an injunction that would prevent any administration from ever interpreting the health law’s wording to prohibit discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity.

In theory, that argument runs counter to the 2019 precedent established by the Supreme Court. But the Texas judge, Reed O’Connor, hasn’t yet weighed in, and has frequently found in favor of lawsuits seeking to limit or undercut the ACA.

“The ultimate interpretation is going to be made by the courts,” Keith said. “I don’t want to say any of this is the last word.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (R-AZ) heads to the Senate floor at the US Capitol building.

Politics

Kyrsten Sinema doesn’t feel the need to explain herself

How she sees past wins sheds light on her resistance to changing long-standing Senate procedures. But the Arizona Democrat isn’t answering a lot of questions about that — or the curtsy.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram