Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Natalia Reyes sits in the exam room as she gets a health care checkup.
(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Election 2020

Democrats’ Georgia victories put Joe Biden’s health care proposals back in play

Some parts of the president-elect's health care agenda — which would particularly affect women and LGBTQ+ people — are likely to gain traction.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2021-01-07 13:47
1:47
January 7, 2021
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Democrats’ projected dual victories in Georgia give President-elect Joe Biden a slim congressional majority to govern — and when it comes to his health care priorities, the implications could be substantial.

Following Tuesday’s runoff elections, in which Democratic candidates Raphael Warnock and Jon Ossoff both beat Republican incumbents, Democrats will have a one-vote majority in the Senate (Vice President-elect Kamala Harris will be the deciding vote), control of the House of Representatives and the power of the executive branch.

The new Senate majority means lawmakers will be more likely to at least vote on Biden-backed health care proposals, which would disproportionately affect women and LGBTQ+ people. But it won’t necessarily be enough to enact some of the sweeping proposals Biden campaigned on, especially if Democrats don’t move to minimize or eliminate the role of the filibuster in passing legislation, which effectively requires 60 votes — not 51 — to get most legislation passed.  

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

For instance, Biden promised to codify the abortion protections in Roe v. Wade, which experts agree remains an uphill battle. He also promised to enact a so-called “public option,” which would create a government-provided health insurance option to expand coverage. 

That change that would disproportionately affect women, who are more likely to cite cost as a reason they can’t afford health care. But there is debate over whether that could be achieved through a process called reconciliation, which requires only 51 votes in the Senate to enact a change, so long as it is considered “budget-neutral.” If it cannot be passed through that process, that would also remain a long-shot.

Still some policies may be easier to enact, through reconciliation or through bipartisan legislation. For instance, there is potentially enough bipartisan support to pass meaningful legislation to tackle pregnancy-related mortality, an area where the United States ranks well below other wealthy nations, said Cynthia Cox, a vice president at nonpartisan health care research group the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF).

Other changes could squeak through even with a 51-vote majority — including smaller but still substantive changes to the Affordable Care Act that could make insurance more available and affordable for women and gender minorities. 

“A unified government could mean substantial changes to the ACA are possible for the first time since it passed over a decade ago,” Cox said. “When Republicans had a unified government in 2017, they couldn’t agree on how to repeal and replace the ACA. Democrats have shown more unity when it comes to how to fix the ACA.”

For one, Cox said, Democrats could enhance subsidies for people purchasing health insurance through the marketplace — providing tax breaks to make private insurance more affordable both for low-income people and those in the upper-middle income bracket who still can’t afford a health plan. Democrats could also extend those subsidies to people who get insurance at work, but who might benefit from a more generous marketplace plan.

Those changes “even without the public option, would lower costs for just about everyone,” she said, especially women who are more likely to earn less and to face financial barriers when it comes to purchasing affordable health insurance.

In a tweet Tuesday night, Larry Levitt, another KFF vice president, listed a few easier changes Democrats could pass as part of the budgetary process, which only requires 51 votes — many of which would have outsized implications for women, who are more likely to shoulder many of health care’s financial burdens, and who disproportionately benefited from the ACA. 

Among those changes, Democrats could empower the government to negotiate for lower drug prices (women are more likely to skip prescription drugs because of cost), and to put forth financial incentives for states to expand eligibility for Medicaid, an optional component of the ACA that would especially affect pregnancy-related health. None of those proposals made it to the Senate floor in the past four years.

Medicaid covers almost half of all the country’s births, and research shows that when states expand eligibility, pregnant people are less likely to lose their coverage after giving birth — meaning they are more likely to continue getting needed health care. The expansion particularly benefits Black and Latinx pregnant people, who are more likely to be covered through Medicaid. 

“You can’t afford health care without insurance coverage, and you want to keep people covered so they can have access to postpartum care,” Sara Rosenbaum, a professor of health law and policy at George Washington University, previously told The 19th.

If a bipartisan bill on pregnancy-related health doesn’t pass, Democrats could use budget reconciliation to extend Medicaid eligibility after giving birth, Cox said. 

Currently, Medicaid coverage ends after six weeks postpartum — even though many suffer complications well into the first year after giving birth. Extending eligibility to a year postpartum could help ameliorate the national pregnancy-related mortality crisis. 

Congress could also pass legislation that would effectively eliminate California v. Texas, a pending Supreme Court case to undo the ACA, by changing the tax penalty levied on people who do not have health insurance. The court case is based on Republican legislation that set the tax penalty to $0 — a change, some Republican states argue, that eliminates the penalty and means the rest of the law must be struck down, too.  

If the court agreed with those states, and eliminated the ACA, that would get rid of the law’s protections for women and LGBTQ+ people. The law is the basis of expanded Medicaid eligibility and prohibited health plans from charging more to insure people with pre-existing medical conditions — a change that particularly benefited women and transgender people. 

The law also required that health insurance plans cover contraception without cost-sharing, pregnancy-related care, prescription drugs and mental health care — all areas with disproportionate gendered impact. Additionally, it prohibited health care discrimination based on gender identity.

“This has the potential to make a very big difference for health care access and continuity, if for no other reason than to preserve the ACA,” Cox said.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

Sen. Kelly Loeffler speaks as the Senate reconvenes after protesters stormed into the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021.

Politics

Loeffler reverses course and certifies 2020 presidential election

The Georgia senator, who lost her runoff election Tuesday night, was one of several Republican women lawmakers who changed their mind and recognized Biden’s victory. 

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram