Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Joe Biden stands at a podium.
U.S. President-elect Joe Biden addresses the media about the Trump Administration’s lawsuit to overturn the Affordable Care Act on November 10, 2020 at the Queen Theater in Wilmington, Delaware. Mr. Biden also answered questions about the process of the transition and how a Biden Administration would work with Republicans. (Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Health

Health care: What Joe Biden can accomplish even with a GOP-controlled Senate

Some of Biden's ambitious plans to extend gender-based health care protections could be accomplished without Congress. 

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2020-11-10 16:29
4:29
November 10, 2020
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

We’re the only newsroom dedicated to writing about gender, politics and policy. Subscribe to our newsletter today.

With the inauguration just a few months away, President-elect Joe Biden is emphasizing the work his administration could do to expand health care access, building on and dramatically expanding the regulations and coverage made available through the Affordable Care Act, including its gender-based protections.

“Beginning on January 20, Vice President-elect Harris and I, we will do everything in our power to ease the burden of health care on you and your families,” Biden said Tuesday. In particular, he said they would pursue “a dramatic expansion of health care coverage and bold steps to lower health care costs.”

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

But when Biden is sworn in come January, he could face an uphill battle to enact his agenda. 

Biden’s plan could have significant gender implications. He has proposed expanding coverage through a public insurance option and legislating more generous subsidies for people buying marketplace plans. Federal data shows that women are more likely to cite high health costs as a barrier toward health insurance; they are also more likely to buy coverage on the individual marketplace. A fifth of transgender people are uninsured, more than twice the national rate — and expanding access to affordable coverage could help close that gap.

But certain aspects of Biden’s health care plan could be dead on arrival, given the Congressional makeup. Democrats are expected to hold the House of Representatives, but Senate elections are ongoing. Currently, Democrats have 48 Senate seats; Republicans have 49 and are expected to pick up Alaska. Both of Georgia’s senate seats have gone to a runoff and  won’t be elected until early 2021.

The Supreme Court will also be a major factor in the ACA’s future. The court is currently weighing a legal challenge that could overturn the entire law, or at the very least, its pre-existing conditions protections. (The court, which heard oral arguments Tuesday, will issue a ruling sometime in the coming months.) 

Congress could theoretically pass legislation to maintain the ACA, but there is little Biden can do independently if the justices ultimately vote to strike down or dramatically scale back the law — though such an outcome appears unlikely.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

If the ACA stands, the new administration could use its own authority to dramatic effect — even without Congress — undoing many of the regulations issued by President Donald Trump and putting in place more funding and health care protections.

“It’s big operational things they might do,” said Katie Keith, a Georgetown University law professor and health policy expert. “There’s straight-up rollback of Trump administration initiatives, and pushing the envelope.” 

Supporting the existing ACA

Simply having the White House be interested in enforcing and supporting the current iteration of the ACA could make a difference, experts agree. The Trump administration cut funding for “navigators,” which are people who are paid to guide enrollees through their ACA coverage options, and declined to open up a special enrollment period for people to buy insurance during the COVID-induced economic downturn.

The Biden administration could use its executive authority to reverse course on both of those without Senate buy-in. And both changes would affect women in particular, since they are more likely to buy insurance on the individual marketplace and are more likely to have lost jobs — and, potentially, health insurance — during the coronavirus pandemic.

Experts also say a President Biden would likely undo many of the regulations issued under Trump, especially those that undercut the ACA’s protections for people with pre-existing conditions and standards for what health insurance must cover. 

Private insurance

On the private insurance side, Biden has indicated he would issue rules to reverse the expansion of so-called “short-term, limited-duration plans” put in place by Trump’s Department of Health and Human Services. Those plans are not sold on the ACA-regulated individual marketplace, and are meant to be stopgap insurance plans lasting just three months – but under Trump, people have been able to buy them for a year at a time, renewable for three years.

Those plans, called “junk insurance” by critics, aren’t required to cover people with pre-existing conditions — a category that more often includes women and LGBTQ+ people — and have bare-bones coverage requirements that often don’t include benefits such as pregnancy-related care, mental health or prescription drugs. 

Experts worry short-term plans, which are cheaper than marketplace coverage, can lull people into a false sense of having adequate insurance, only to be left hanging in case of actual medical need. The burden is heightened for women and LGBTQ+ people, who also have higher rates of anxiety and depression, and are more likely to forgo prescriptions because of cost. 

“The benefits are horrible for women. None of them include maternity care,” said Laurie Sobel, the associate director for women’s health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation. “In terms of feeling like you have coverage and affordability [and then not having it] —  those are things that tend to strike women more.”

Transgender health care

Under President Barack Obama, the government interpreted the ACA’s anti-sex discrimination protections to prohibit denying people health care based on their gender identity. The Trump administration sought to walk that back, though its proposed new rule never took effect.

Biden has promised to reverse the Trump administration changes, restoring ACA protections for transgender people. But his administration could go further, Keith said, issuing regulations that also explicitly prohibit health care discrimination based on sexual orientation, something the Obama administration never did. 

That protection would also have firmer legal standing now, she argued, following a July Supreme Court ruling that found sex discrimination prohibitions also applied to gender identity and sexual orientation. 

“I think there’s a question of, are there ways they go further than what the Obama administration did,” she said. “Some of the things the Obama administration did weren’t enough at the time. It’s definitely not enough now.”

Reproductive health

Biden said he would increase access to abortion and contraception — though some of those changes could run up against an unfriendly judiciary. 

As president, Trump has sought to undermine abortion access in particular, issuing rules to bar health care providers from the federal Title X program — which financially supports family planning services — if they refer patients to abortion services. 

The Title X rule resulted in more than 1,000 family planning clinics leaving the program, including more than 400 Planned Parenthood affiliates. Those clinics are often responsible for providing contraception, cancer screenings and other preventive health care. 

Reversing that regulation would be fairly easy to do. But other changes — such as reversing Trump-era efforts to undercut contraceptive coverage, which is guaranteed under the ACA — will be much harder. The Trump administration, backed by multiple Supreme Court rulings, has argued that employers could opt out if they had a moral or religious objection to birth control. 

Sobel imagined the new White House might take steps to limit cases in which an employer can claim a moral exemption from contraceptive coverage. But new family planning regulations would likely be subject to litigation, she said. It’s unclear how either the federal judiciary or Supreme Court — the latter of which now has three Trump-appointed justices — would rule. And again, if the ACA is struck down, those questions could become meaningless.

“Obviously the thing on everyone’s mind is the ACA case,” Sobel said. 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

A group of people stand with signs that read

Health

The Affordable Care Act — and its protections for women and LGBTQ+ people — looks likely to survive

Two conservative Supreme Court justices indicated in oral arguments that they would not strike down the health-care law.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram