Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Protesters gather outside of the Supreme Court. The sign in the foreground reads
Anti-abortion demonstrators rally outside of the U.S. Supreme Court. (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana)

Health

Abortion restrictions are on the ballot in Louisiana and Colorado

Two ballot initiatives could preview a future without Roe v. Wade, one in which voters can add new restrictions or virtually ban the procedure.

By

Shefali Luthra, Barbara Rodriguez

Published

2020-10-29 09:15
9:15
October 29, 2020
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

We’re the only newsroom dedicated to writing about gender, politics and policy. Subscribe to our newsletter today.

Voters in Louisiana and Colorado will determine whether or not to implement new state-specific abortion restrictions — a prelude to reproductive health battles that activists expect will play out across the country with a more conservative U.S. Supreme Court.

In Louisiana, residents voting in the general election are being asked to amend the state constitution to explicitly limit abortion rights. Colorado voters, meanwhile, are deciding whether to ban abortions after 22 weeks of pregnancy (defined as since the last menstrual period), with exceptions only if the parent’s life is immediately endangered by continuing with pregnancy — at which point, doctors say, the parent would be likely to die regardless of medical intervention. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The battles over these initiatives are happening as President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden cast themselves on opposing ends of the issue. Trump has campaigned against abortion access, while Biden has said that, if elected president, he would prioritize enshrining the constitutional protections guaranteed in Roe v. Wade.

Meanwhile, advocates on both sides of the issue believe that Monday’s confirmation of Amy Coney Barrett could lead to restrictions on abortion access. Barrett has previously suggested that Roe v. Wade was wrongly decided, and, as a federal judge, signed onto dissenting opinions that supported greater abortion restrictions.

If the landmark 1973 ruling is overturned, the future of abortion access will be decided by states. 

Amendments like Louisiana’s are meant in anticipation of Roe v. Wade’s precedent being overturned, said Elizabeth Nash, who tracks state policy for the Guttmacher Institute.

“If the federal protections are dismantled, and there are no protections in the state constitution, it’s much easier to pass an abortion ban,” she said.

Colorado and Louisiana, then, could be seen as test cases for the future of abortion access. Nash said if restrictions pass in Louisiana and Colorado, those could help create a playbook for abortion opponents to advance policies either through a petition-led ballot initiative or, if that’s not possible, state constitutional amendments first pushed through statehouses.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Amendment 1 in Louisiana

Even before Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death in September raised alarms for abortion access advocates, Katrina Rogers said she has been working under the premise that abortion access was not safe in the courts. 

“I was always running this campaign with the assumption of Roe being overturned, and not in the far off future,” said Rogers, the campaign director for Louisiana for Personal Freedoms, a coalition working to reject the constitutional amendment. “We can’t afford to be lackadaisical, or not move with a sense of urgency when it comes to protecting people’s lives and wellness and rights and bodily autonomy.”  

The ballot measure in Louisiana, known as Amendment 1, asks voters to approve new language to the state constitution that would say the state does not protect the right to an abortion nor will the state pay for one. (The state already prohibits Medicaid funding for abortions unless there is a health emergency or if there is a case of rape or incest.)

“The amendment is sweeping in that it really makes no room for abortion,” Rogers said, also calling the measure “an attack on abortion access” and one that its residents did not seek. 

The state legislature approved the constitutional amendment during its 2019 session with at least two-thirds of the vote, sending the proposal to voters. While Republicans control both legislative chambers, several Democrats also supported the measure, including a Democratic state senator who introduced the proposal.

It comes just months after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a different Louisiana state law that would have required doctors who perform abortions to have admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. The court ruled that a nearly identical Texas law was unconstitutional in 2016.

Constitutional amendments to restrict abortion rights are not new. Tennessee voters approved a similar measure in 2014; voters in West Virginia and Alabama did the same in 2018. The ballot measures in Tennessee and West Virginia were close, with just over half of voters approving them.

Pearl Ricks, the executive director of Reproductive Justice Action Collective, an organization based in New Orleans that provides emergency contraception and does advocacy work, is worried about the ramifications of the amendment and is working to reject it. Ricks said that when abortion access comes down to where you live, low-income people are less likely to be able to afford costs associated with travel and taking time off of work.

“The idea of having an unexpected cost come up that involves not only the procedure, but the transportation, and the lodging and the child care for some people who already have their families started, when we look at the idea of getting that done, there aren’t a lot of people that can successfully do that by themselves,” they said.

They also said it’s important to acknowledge that policies that restrict abortion access also limit reproductive rights for transgender and nonbinary people who become pregnant.

Rogers believes in a world where Roe v. Wade is overturned, wealthy people will be able to travel out-of-state to access an abortion. In Louisiana, the procedure would become effectively illegal. The state has enacted at least 89 abortion restrictions since the Roe ruling, more than any other in the country.

“If you’re of means it’s an inconvenience, and if you aren’t of means it can be death or criminalization,” she said.

Louisiana Right to Life claims on its website that the measure, which it calls the “Love Life Amendment,” will ensure judges cannot establish abortion rights. The organization points to state Supreme Court rulings elsewhere that have previously upheld abortion rights following legal challenges.

“Their decisions have resulted in pro-life laws being struck down by judges, reinforcing an abortion-on-demand policy. We can’t let this happen in Louisiana,” reads a passage on the group’s website.

If it succeeds, Louisiana’s measure could spur other states to consider similar constitutional amendments, Nash said. 

“What you imagine is that the states in the South and the Midwest will continue to adopt abortion restrictions and work to make it even harder to access services,” she said. “While states on the West Coast and in the Northeast will look to not only protect abortion legally, but ensure that access is available and affordable.”

Julie Warden agrees. She is an organizer who tried to defeat the abortion amendment measure that ultimately passed in West Virginia in 2018. Days after the measure passed, a health state agency issued a public notice to clarify that Medicaid would now only cover abortion in instances where a pregnant person’s life is endangered, if the fetus has defects or is unlikely to survive, or if there is a case of rape or incest.

Warden is the chief operating officer at WV FREE, a West Virginia organization that advocates for reproductive health rights in the state. She is concerned about the ramifications of giving the state government more power over bodily autonomy.

“If you start today by taking my rights away, whose rights are you going to come for tomorrow?” she said. 

Proposition 115 in Colorado

In Colorado, much like Louisiana, the proposed restrictions could have significant consequences both within the state and for access in other parts of the country. Currently, Colorado does not limit when in pregnancy someone can get an abortion. 

The proposed ban, which does not include exceptions for cases of life-threatening abnormality in the fetus or for cases when the pregnancy is a result of rape or incest, would put Colorardo in line with 18 other states that ban abortion sometime between 20 and 22 weeks, per the Guttmacher Institute. 

If it passes, Proposition 115 would have ramifications both within Colorado and beyond the state. More than 11 percent of abortions in Colorado are performed on people who have traveled from one of 30 other states, per 2019 data from the state’s department of health. Guttmacher has also estimated that, if it passes, people seeking abortions at 22 weeks or after would have to drive at least 300 miles each way to seek such care.

The vast majority of abortions occur before 22 weeks. But research shows that people who do terminate pregnancies at that point often are younger and disconnected from the health care system in other ways — they have lower incomes, may have faced challenges finding a physician or are more often experiencing domestic violence. 

“What we see with this ban is it would potentially impact people who are already facing the most barriers,” said Dr. Rebecca Cohen, an OB/GYN in the Denver area who is campaigning against the initiative.

Some patients have also discovered abnormalities that threaten the life of the fetus, or have learned that going forward could jeopardize the parent’s health, she said. Still, there isn’t good data tracking how often abortions performed at this stage of pregnancy are prompted by those specific health concerns.

Dr. Tom Perille, a retired internal medicine doctor who heads the state’s Democrats for Life, argued that, if the ban is passed, people can get screenings earlier to determine if they want to proceed with pregnancy. 

In cases where a fetal abnormality is discovered, he argued that parents should instead seek perinatal hospice after birth — in which doctors work to limit a newborn’s suffering, even if the baby isn’t expected to live long. (The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists argues that such hospice should be offered as one option, along with abortion.)

Polling suggests Colorado voters are about evenly split, with 13 percent of voters still undecided. And even if the ban passed, it could still face legal challenges. Colorado’s attorney general has argued that the ban would not satisfy existing Supreme Court precedent, which holds that abortion rights are protected up until a fetus is viable. Medical consensus typically suggests that viability emerges around 24 weeks.

If Colorado’s ban passes, that could similarly spur abortion opponents to try their luck in more traditionally blue states, where the statehouse or governor’s office otherwise might not support those policies.

“Ballot initiative is a way to essentially query voters. When you have no success at the legislative level, you have another option,” Nash said. “Certainly some other states might take notice of however [it] pans out for their next steps.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

Presidential advisor Ivanka Trump waits to leave after taking part in a roundtable discussion about the future of child care at the Bright Beginnings Learning Center early Friday, July 24, 2020, in Greenwood Village, Colo.

Election 2020

Child care, once a priority, is now a footnote for the Trump administration

The issue has been largely absent from the debates and campaign rallies at a time when parents seem to care about it most. But as with so many topics, the pandemic has made it political. 

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram