Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The outside of the Supreme Court.
(Photo By Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

Health

Supreme Court agrees to hear Mississippi challenge to Roe v. Wade

Justices are likely to rule next summer on whether a ban on abortions after 15 weeks is constitutional.

By

Shefali Luthra, Mariel Padilla

Published

2021-05-17 09:29
9:29
May 17, 2021
am

Updated

2021-05-17 19:09:33.000000
America/New_York

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Support our community. Have a seat at our table. Become a 19th member.

The Supreme Court will hear a case this fall that could roll back the constitutional right to an abortion established by Roe v. Wade.

The case, Dobbs vs. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, concerns a Mississippi law that bans abortions after 15 weeks. Under Roe v. Wade, people are guaranteed the right to an abortion until the fetus is medically able to live outside the womb, typically around 24 weeks, though the definition varies from case to case. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Subsequent cases have granted states the right to regulate abortion access, and those rulings in turn have opened the door to many states — particularly those considered hostile to abortion rights — passing laws that often make it harder to get an abortion. 

But those restrictions, while targeting the circumstances under which one may receive abortion, did not take direct aim at the core protection of Roe v. Wade: the right to have an abortion up until the fetus is viable. The 15-week ban is seen as a likely candidate to weaken that protection.

In accepting the case, the Supreme Court said it would specifically examine whether “all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional.” A ruling is likely to come down next summer. The court had waited for months before deciding whether to hear the Mississippi case, fueling speculation among observers that its members may have been unsure about whether they wanted to weigh in on this form of ban, or on a less sweeping restriction. The law had so far been blocked by the 5th U.S. Court of Appeals.

Laurie Sobel, the associate director of women’s health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, said it was “alarming” that the Supreme Court decided to review the case even after a lower court ruled in agreement with Roe v. Wade.

The Supreme Court currently has six conservative justices, including three appointed by former President Donald Trump, who long vowed to nominate members who would undo the protections granted by Roe v. Wade. Advocates across the ideological spectrum believe the current court makeup to be unfriendly toward maintaining those protections. 

“It’s been a long time coming,” Sobel said. “Many states have gerrymandered districts that have resulted in legislatures that are very interested in abolishing in abortion. Trump filled over 200 federal court seats, and now these states see an opening.” 

The number of abortions has steadily decreased in the United States. over the last several decades, often attributed to the increased affordability and accessibility of contraception. Depending on how the court rules, future access to abortion might depend entirely on where one lives, Sobel said. In the last several years, more than 250 abortion clinics have closed. Currently, six states — including Mississippi — only have one abortion clinic. Three states only have two clinics and another six states have three each.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

It’s not yet clear if upholding the ban would mean other, similar bans would also be immediately upheld. If so, the impact would be vast. 

As of last fall, 16 states had laws that would immediately ban abortion if Roe v. Wade was overturned, per a briefing by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF). However, legal experts are unsure if they would need to be passed once again following any court ruling. 

As of May 1, more than 530 abortion restrictions have been introduced in 2021, an unprecedented number over such a period of time, according to a tally by the Guttmacher Institute. Already, 61 abortion restrictions in 13 states have been passed this year alone and at least 16 states had attempted to ban abortion at some point before viability. Texas is expected to be the latest state to pass such a restriction — Gov. Greg Abbott has indicated he will sign a recently passed bill that would ban the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy, a “heartbeat bill” that has also passed in several states, including Ohio, Georgia, Louisiana, Missouri, Alabama and Kentucky. None of the bills went into effect due to immediate court challenges. 

During a press conference on Monday, White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki said she wouldn’t comment on the Supreme Court’s decision to take the case but said more generally that the right to health care and the right to choose have been under “withering and extreme attack” these past four years.

“The president and the vice president are devoted to ensuring that every American has access to health care, including reproductive health care — regardless of their income, zip code, race, health insurance status or immigration status,” she said. 

Psaki also said President Joe Biden is committed to codifying Roe v. Wade regardless of the outcome of this case.

“Make no mistake,” Elizabeth Nash, the institute’s principal policy associate on state issues, said in a statement. “The purpose of any abortion ban — including this 15-week ban in Mississippi — is to snowball into a outright ban on all abortion at any point in pregnancy and for any reason.” 

According to a KFF survey published in January 2020, the majority of Democrats and independents do not want to see Roe v. Wade overturned, but most Republicans do. Across partisan lines, nearly 40 percent of women identify as “pro-life.” And about 27 percent of women believe it is currently “too easy” for women to access abortions, while 37 percent think it is “too difficult.”

In a responding press teleconference, Nancy Northup, the president and chief executive of the Center for Reproductive Rights said that “alarm bells should be going off” for people who want to make sure abortion remains safe and legal. 

“The Supreme Court has heard various cases over the years on different issues, but never before an abortion ban case,” Northup said. “The Court has previously refused again and again to review these kinds of laws because they are clearly unconstitutional and in violation of 50 years of precedent.”

Katie Glenn, the government affairs counsel for Americans United for Life, said in a statement that the country’s highest court finds itself “grappling with abortion” every few years and argued its “true constitutional business” is to protect the human right to life. 

The vast majority of abortions occur early in pregnancy, with more than 90 percent performed during the first trimester — at or before 13 weeks — according to the latest KFF data. Abortions that occur at or after 21 weeks only account for less than 2 percent of all abortions. 

Maureen G. Phipps, the chief executive officer of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, said in a statement that abortion restrictions like Mississippi’s ban worsen existing inequities in the health care system and disproportionately impact people of color. 

“Abortion access in the United States is in crisis,” Phipps said. “Across the country, politicians are advancing legislation that would impose professional, civil and even severe criminal penalties on clinicians for providing safe, high-quality abortion care to their patients.” 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

A patient rests in a corridor as a nurse looks on in the distance.

Business & Economy

Women in health care are at a breaking point — and they’re leaving

In the pandemic, women are abandoning health care jobs, citing burnout and decades of inequities in a system that was never designed to support them.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram