Skip to content

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
      • Pregnant people are at 'greater risk' in states hit hard by wildfire smoke, air pollution, new report shows

        Jessica Kutz · April 20
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
      • U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik wants to elect more Republican women into office

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 13
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Jessica Cisneros takes on the last anti-abortion U.S. House Democrat

        Amanda Becker · February 25
      • Meet J. Michelle Childs, South Carolina judge and possible Supreme Court contender

        Candice Norwood · February 18
      • ‘The bench is loaded’: A record number of Latinas are running for governor

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 11
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: The governor’s races we’re watching in 2022

        Barbara Rodriguez · May 3
      • The 19th Explains: What to know about Ketanji Brown Jackson’s Supreme Court confirmation hearing

        Candice Norwood, Terri Rupar · March 21
      • The 19th Explains: Colleges are dropping the SAT in admissions. That’s a good thing for most girls.

        Nadra Nittle · March 3
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
      • Girls are being socialized to lose political ambition — and it starts younger than we realized

        Barbara Rodriguez · September 23
      • Kathy Hochul’s rise in New York spotlights the barriers to women becoming governors

        Barbara Rodriguez · August 23
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • Woman alleges that an assisted living facility denied her admission because she is transgender

        Sara Luterman · November 8
      • LGBTQ+ seniors fear having to go back in closet for the care they need

        Sara Luterman · October 12
      • The pandemic continues to strain nursing homes. What happens if a lot of them close?

        Mariel Padilla · September 9
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Florida’s redistricting fight continues. The head of the state League of Women Voters talks about what’s at stake.

        Barbara Rodriguez · April 19
      • Women have been sounding the alarm ahead of Texas’ first-in-the-nation primary

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 28
      • LGBTQ+ people of color are at risk from rising voter restrictions as federal protections falter in the Senate, advocates say

        Orion Rummler · January 19

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Elections 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th News(letter)

News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Donate to get our member newsletter

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Women in all white sitting in the back of a truck with
A case argued that a Florida law requiring formerly incarcerated people to pay court fees and fines constituted a poll tax, and cited that the law was a 19th Amendment violation. (AP Photo/David Crigger, Bristol Herald Courier)

Election 2020

Nation’s lone 19th Amendment felony disenfranchisement lawsuit struck down by appeals court

The 11th Circuit ruled that court fees and restitution are not “poll taxes,” but demands of justice.

Ko Bragg

General Assignment Reporter

Ko Bragg portrait

Published

2020-09-14 18:26
6:26
September 14, 2020
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

More than 700,000 formerly incarcerated Floridians owe money to the courts — and now, following a 6-4 decision by an appeals court last week, they will not be able to vote in the 2020 presidential election unless they pay off the fees, which for some can be excessively high. 

The case, which was the nation’s sole felony disenfranchisement lawsuit citing a 19th Amendment violation, argued that a Florida law requiring formerly incarcerated people to pay court fees and fines constituted a poll tax.

Earlier this year, a federal judge agreed. On Friday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit overturned the earlier ruling and declared the law constitutional.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“The reason these laws leave some felons disenfranchised — the justification for their continued disenfranchisement — is not their failure to pay a tax,” the appeals ruling reads. “It is instead Florida’s legitimate interest in restoring to the electorate only fully rehabilitated felons who have satisfied the demands of justice.” 

Plaintiffs could appeal this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, but have not yet finalized the decision.

In 2018, two-thirds of Floridians voted in favor of an amendment to restore voting rights to 1.5 million formerly incarcerated people. It was billed as the largest mass enfranchisement effort since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. The Republican-led state legislature responded with Senate Bill 7066, which said that restitution, fines, and court costs — referred to as legal financial obligations — must be paid before someone who’d served their prison time, including parole and other supervisory measures, could register to vote. 

The law has been in the courts ever since. 

In the appeal, Nancy Abudu, the deputy legal director for Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), brought a 19th Amendment claim on behalf of Rosemary McCoy and Sheila Singleton, two formerly incarcerated Black women who cannot pay their fees. McCoy owes about $7,500 in victim restitution, including interest; Singleton owes $12,000, including interest. Duval County, where they live, requires these fees to be paid all at once. Statewide, payment plans are left to the discretion of the counties, some of which tack on a 40 percent collections fee to unpaid court debt.

SPLC argues that harsh economic realities — Black women are more likely to live in poverty, make less money than their white counterparts, and are less likely to get a job when they have a criminal record — will disproportionately deny voting rights to women like McCoy and Singleton. 

“When you talk about the ability to pay these fines, if you are a woman already making less money, if you are Black and already discriminated against, and if you are poor and don’t even have real access, then of course this requirement is going to have a disparate impact on low-income women of color,” Abudu told The 19th in August.  

Abudu said Friday’s decision was completely contrary to the “words and spirit” of the constitution. 

Related Articles

  • On suffrage centennial, Black women are fighting a modern day ‘poll tax’
  • ‘We’ versus ‘Me’: Suffrage centennial exposes vote gap in Black and White women
  • Labor rights mobilized women during suffrage — and now

“The poll tax we have challenged — and will continue to challenge — especially burdens Floridians who are low-income people of color, especially women who statistically earn less than men with or without a criminal conviction,” Abudu said in a statement. “Floridians like our clients Rosemary McCoy and Sheila Singleton will be shut out of the democratic process this November simply because they lack the thousands of dollars they owe in [legal financial obligations] in order to vote. There is no rehabilitative goal that can be accomplished by denying the franchise to people solely based on their economic status.” 

The portion of the appeal court’s ruling that mentions the 19th Amendment is mainly a debate in semantics, and the appeals court majority does not believe the 24th Amendment’s outlawing of taxes “by reason of” failure to pay a tax equates to the 19th and 15th Amendment protecting the right to vote “on account of” sex and race, respectively. 

Over the past year, five felony disenfranchisement cases, including McCoy and Singleton’s, have been consolidated into Jones v. Florida, which won a favorable ruling from U.S. District Judge Robert Hinkle in May. 

Florida Gov. Rick DeSantis’ legal team kept pushing, achieving a temporary injunction of Hinkle’s decision, which blocked formerly incarcerated people who owe money from voting in this summer’s primaries, despite plaintiffs’ last-ditch effort to get the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene. 

On August 18, the governor’s efforts culminated in a rare en banc, or full court hearing by the 11th Circuit, on the same day as Florida’s primary elections and the centennial of the 19th Amendment. Friday’s ruling put an end to this fight, but plaintiffs still have lingering questions.

In Hinkle’s May decision to overturn the “pay-to-vote system,” he said it would take until 2026 for Florida to find out which citizens owe money and how much they owe. In the meantime, this “uncertainty” would deny almost a quarter million Floridians access to the franchise — unless they want to risk more prison time. Plaintiffs took issue with the fact that the 11th Circuit appeals court never denied that the system of telling formerly incarcerated people the amount they owe creates an “administrative nightmare.” 

Then, there is the appeals court itself. 

In July, voting rights attorneys, including Abudu, requested that Judges Robert Luck, Barbara Lagoa and Andrew Brasher be disqualified from ruling on Jones v. Florida based on their past involvement in voting rights cases. Brasher was the only among them to recuse himself, following up on his promise to step down from any case involving a government policy he previously defended. As former solicitor general of Alabama, he worked on the Thompson v. Alabama case, another felony voting rights case. 

A newsletter you can relate to

Storytelling that represents you, delivered to your inbox.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Luck and Lagoa declined to recuse themselves. During their confirmation hearings to become federal appeals judges, Luck and Lagoa, former Florida Supreme Court justices, stated in writing to the Senate Judiciary Committee their promises to recuse themselves from any case involving the Florida Supreme Court during their tenure. In September 2019, the Florida Supreme Court weighed in on defining legal financial obligations at DeSantis’ request. Luck and Lagoa heard oral arguments on the matter before being confirmed to the 11th Circuit in November 2019. 

Luck and Lagoa denied the recusal motion themselves in July, pointing out, in part, that the state supreme court’s review was not at issue in this case and that neither of them were still members of that court when it issued the advisory opinion on voting fees to DeSantis this January. 

Had Luck and Lagoa stepped down, the remaining justices would’ve been deadlocked, leaving the lower court ruling in place and allowing defendants like McCoy and Singleton to vote. 

Brasher, Luck and Lagoa were appointed under President Donald Trump, who’s appointed more federal appeals court judges to date than any recent president at the same point in their presidency, according to the Pew Research Center. 

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Building stronger together.

A new model for nonprofit journalism: For our readers. For our team. For our community.

Become a member

Sign up for our newsletter

Up Next

Shirley Chisholm speaks at a campaign rally.

Election 2020

Black electoral advocates lean on past movements to build power ‘from the grassroots up’

In 1972 Shirley Chisholm ran for president and thousands attended the National Black Political Convention. Can 2020 harness that energy?

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Subscribe to the Newsletter
  • Attend an Event
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram