Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • 1 in 4 parents report being fired for work interruptions due to child care breakdowns

        Chabeli Carrazana · February 2
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
      • Few incarcerated women were released during COVID. The ones who remain have struggled.

        Candice Norwood · August 17
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Connecticut voters approved early voting. Here’s how their new secretary of state wants to make it happen.

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 13
      • Women lawmakers in Minnesota are in the vanguard of the democracy movement

        Barbara Rodriguez · February 3
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Election 2024
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Military
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

Medication for fertility treatment on a table.
IVF medications (Photo by Carolyn Van Houten/The Washington Post/Getty Images)

Abortion

‘This is our new normal’: Fertility treatment advocates are gearing up to fight abortion bans and personhood laws

RESOLVE, a major advocacy group, is launching a new campaign to bring fertility patients’ and doctors’ stories directly to lawmakers — and the public — in 2023.

Grace Panetta

Political reporter

Published

2022-11-14 19:30
7:30
November 14, 2022
pm

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Anti-abortion politicians and ballot initiatives lost big at the ballot box in the 2022 midterms. But fertility treatment advocates and patients are gearing up to fight against the next wave of anti-abortion legislation and restrictions on reproductive health.  

RESOLVE: The National Infertility Association is gearing up for 2023 state legislative sessions with a new initiative, Fight for Families, to expand its lobbying and advocacy against strict abortion bans and proposed personhood laws that could threaten access to fertility treatments including in vitro fertilization, or IVF. 

Fight for Families, the details of which were shared first with The 19th, will build on RESOLVE’s current lobbying and organizing in statehouses against laws that seek to establish personhood for embryos at the moment of fertilization. In addition to tracking and monitoring legislation that could threaten IVF, it will center the voices of fertility doctors and affected patients sharing their stories directly with lawmakers and the public. 

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

“We have been fighting these attempts at the state level for the last 15 years or so,” Barb Collura, RESOLVE’s president and CEO, told The 19th in an interview. “But the stakes are much higher. And we have such incredible stories from our community that need to be told.” 

Betsy Campbell, RESOLVE’s chief engagement officer, said patient stories and testimony have been crucial for the organization’s past work defeating proposed fetal personhood laws, expanding insurance coverage for fertility treatment and egg freezing, and bolstering access to IVF and surrogacy for LGBTQ+ couples. 

“Fight for Families is a public education and storytelling campaign,” Campbell said. “Whenever we’re advocating in a state, whether it’s good or bad legislation, it’s important for patients to share their stories. That’s how we’ve had success passing pro-family bills, and it’s how we’ve had success fighting bills that are anti-family.”

  • More from The 19th
    In this illustration, two people hug each other. In the background, a window reminiscent of an airplane or train window is seen. The window seems to be closing. The shadows in the picture are heavy and evoke a feeling of unease and uncertainty.
  • IVF patients started moving their embryos out of states with abortion bans when Roe fell
  • For fertility doctors, a moral question: Will they help protect IVF from abortion bans?
  • Many low-income people are already shut out of IVF. Could abortion bans make it even more expensive?

The Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade brought the consequences of abortion bans into stark relief for those affected by infertility and pregnancy loss. Some patients struggled to receive care for miscarriages and complications later in pregnancy, and those who created frozen embryos in IVF worried laws defining life at the moment of fertilization could threaten the routine practice of disposing of some embryos. 

In a given IVF cycle, embryos are often frozen but later discarded because of genetic abnormalities uncovered in testing, other problems that could reduce the chances of a successful pregnancy, or because they’re not needed. And if an IVF cycle results in multiple viable fetuses implanting in the uterus, some IVF patients also opt for selective reduction to reduce medical risks associated with carrying multiples. 

Over a dozen states have total abortion bans in effect, some of which define the beginning of life as the moment of fertilization, even before conception. Alabama’s abortion ban contains a specific carveout for embryos created as part of IVF cycles, but other states’ abortion bans are much murkier on where life begins — leaving patients and providers in a lurch. 

E-Beth Marshall, an infertility patient advocate and RESOLVE board member based in Arizona, said many fertility patients are still “stuck in these islands” of inconsistent insurance coverage, legal uncertainty and the fear of not being able to access abortion care if a wanted pregnancy becomes dangerous or non-viable. 

“We talk about how to prevent pregnancy, and we talk about what to do when you have a pregnancy and what your choices are,” Marshall said. “We kind of lose in the middle what happens when you can’t get pregnant or when you can get pregnant, but you have recurring losses.”

Republicans lost ground in state legislatures Tuesday, with Democrats flipping control of key battleground chambers in Michigan and Minnesota, and three states voting to enshrine reproductive rights protections into their state constitutions. 

But advocates are nervously anticipating Republican-controlled states introducing both restrictions on the handling of embryos in IVF itself and additional abortion bans and personhood laws that could threaten access to fertility treatment more broadly in 2023 legislative sessions.

Comments from some politicians and candidates have sparked concern about the future of IVF. An IVF patient in Tennessee, Sara Chambers, emailed her state representative to seek clarity on whether the state’s abortion ban, which defines life at the moment of fertilization, meant she couldn’t dispose of her embryos. He responded that “life does begin at conception either in the womb or in the IVF clinic.” 

And top lawmakers in Florida, where Republicans gained a legislative supermajority, are already discussing plans to pass abortion restrictions stricter than the state’s current 15-week ban. 

Trying to ban IVF altogether is likely a political non-starter in any legislature. But infertility treatment advocates worry that personhood laws and potential restrictions on genetic testing and destruction of embryos could put fertility treatment out of reach for many.

“Our experience has been when we have conversations with lawmakers, they didn’t realize that the legislation implicates IVF and can make it more difficult for people trying to have a healthy pregnancy,” Campbell said. “That’s why these patient stories are so important.”

Sean Tipton, the chief advocacy, policy and development officer for the American Society of Reproductive Medicine, previously told The 19th that such restrictions could result in “the best way to do IVF” becoming prohibitively expensive and burdensome. 

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

Please check your email to confirm your subscription!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“We’re expecting bills to be written in a way that not only impacts the creation and disposition of embryos during an IVF cycle, but also prevent an infertility patient from getting the care they need during an ectopic pregnancy or miscarriage,” Campbell said. “In the post-Roe world, we’re not only opposing personhood, but also protecting IVF and others trying to build their family.”

Collura likened potential regulations on fertility clinics to the targeted restrictions on abortion providers, or TRAP laws, that many Republican-controlled states passed to make abortion less accessible without banning it outright. 

“I think they’re gonna be savvier, smarter and maybe sneakier about how they do this and it’s not going to be as obvious,” she said. “And I’m worried that we’re gonna see things regulating what people can and can’t do with their embryos. We haven’t seen specific kind of thing before, but I think they’re going to say, ‘Hey, you can still do it, you can still go to a fertility clinic, you just have to do this and that with your embryo.’” 

And despite the major setbacks abortion opponents faced in the midterms, Collura warns that anti-abortion movements won’t be dialing back their presence in statehouses anytime soon. “This is our new normal for the future. This is not about 2023 only,” she said.

Marshall, one of RESOLVE’s on-the-ground advocates and volunteers, is planning on showing up for the long haul, saying one of her first goals is to meet every newly elected state senator in Arizona.  

“I think people need to understand that it’s not just about a baby, it’s about having a normal functioning reproductive system,” Marshall added. “It’s so important for women to have that, and if they need a little help, that’s okay. It doesn’t make anyone any less or any undeserving.”

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

The 19th Represents Summit

Don’t miss our biggest event of 2023!

Register Today

Become a member

Up Next

A woman fills out her ballot at a table.

Election 2022

Two states have still never had an out LGBTQ+ person in their legislatures

This lack of representation persists even after a year in which out LGBTQ+ candidates ran and won up and down the ballot across the country — and three legislative candidates in Alaska made history.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram