Skip to content Skip to search

Republish This Story

* Please read before republishing *

We’re happy to make this story available to republish for free under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives Creative Commons license as long as you follow our republishing guidelines, which require that you credit The 19th and retain our pixel. See our full guidelines for more information.

To republish, simply copy the HTML at right, which includes our tracking pixel, all paragraph styles and hyperlinks, the author byline and credit to The 19th. Have questions? Please email [email protected].

— The Editors

Loading...

Modal Gallery

/
Sign up for our newsletter

Menu

  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships
    • From the Collection

      Changing Child Care

      Illustration of a woman feeding a baby a bottle
      • Washington, D.C., offers financial relief to local child care workers

        Orion Rummler · September 20
      • As climate change worsens hurricane season in Louisiana, doulas are ensuring parents can safely feed their babies

        Jessica Kutz · May 5
      • Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito argued abortion isn’t an economic issue. But is that true?

        Chabeli Carrazana · May 4
    • From the Collection

      Next-Gen GOP

      Illustration of a woman riding an elephant
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • A banner year for Republican women

        Amanda Becker · November 11
      • Republican women could double representation in the U.S. House

        Amanda Becker · November 4
    • From the Collection

      On The Rise

      Illustration of three women marching
      • Can Cheri Beasley build a winning coalition in North Carolina?

        Candice Norwood · October 11
      • Los Angeles has never elected a woman mayor. Karen Bass hopes to change that.

        Nadra Nittle · September 8
      • Judge J. Michelle Childs is confirmed to D.C. appeals court

        Candice Norwood · July 20
    • From the Collection

      Pandemic Within a Pandemic

      Illustration of four people marching for Black Lives Matter with coronavirus as the backdrop
      • The 19th Explains: Why the nursing shortage isn’t going away anytime soon

        Mariel Padilla · September 23
      • Some LGBTQ+ people worry that the COVID-19 vaccine will affect HIV medication. It won’t.

        Orion Rummler · November 23
      • Why are more men dying from COVID? It’s a complicated story of nature vs. nurture, researchers say

        Mariel Padilla · September 22
    • From the Collection

      Portraits of a Pandemic

      Illustration of a woman wearing a mask and holding up the coronavirus
      • For family caregivers, COVID is a mental health crisis in the making

        Shefali Luthra · October 8
      • A new database tracks COVID-19’s effects on sex and gender

        Shefali Luthra · September 15
      • Pregnant in a pandemic: The 'perfect storm for a crisis'

        Shefali Luthra · August 25
    • From the Collection

      The 19th Explains

      People walking from many articles to one article where they can get the context they need on an issue.
      • The 19th Explains: What we know about Brittney Griner’s case and what it took to get her home

        Candice Norwood, Katherine Gilyard · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why the Respect for Marriage Act doesn’t codify same-sex marriage rights

        Kate Sosin · December 8
      • The 19th Explains: Why baby formula is still hard to find months after the shortage

        Mariel Padilla · December 1
    • From the Collection

      The Electability Myth

      Illustration of three women speaking at podiums
      • Mayra Flores’ victory set a record for women in Congress. It also reflects the growing visibility of Republican Latinas

        Candice Norwood · June 21
      • Stepping in after tragedy: How political wives became widow lawmakers

        Mariel Padilla · May 24
      • Do term limits help women candidates? New York could be a new testing ground

        Barbara Rodriguez · January 11
    • From the Collection

      The Impact of Aging

      A number of older people walking down a path of information.
      • From ballroom dancing to bloodshed, the older AAPI community grapples with gun control

        Nadra Nittle, Mariel Padilla · January 27
      • 'I'm planning on working until the day I die': Older women voters are worried about the future

        Mariel Padilla · June 3
      • Climate change is forcing care workers to act as first responders

        Jessica Kutz · May 31
    • From the Collection

      Voting Rights

      A series of hands reaching for ballots.
      • Election workers believe in our system — and want everyone else to, too

        Barbara Rodriguez, Jennifer Gerson · November 8
      • Voter ID laws stand between transgender people, women and the ballot box

        Barbara Rodriguez · October 14
      • Emily’s List expands focus on diverse candidates and voting rights ahead of midterm elections

        Errin Haines · August 30

    View all collections

  • Explore by Topic

    • 19th Polling
    • Abortion
    • Business & Economy
    • Caregiving
    • Coronavirus
    • Education
    • Election 2020
    • Election 2022
    • Environment & Climate
    • Health
    • Immigration
    • Inside The 19th
    • Justice
    • LGBTQ+
    • Politics
    • Press Release
    • Race
    • Sports
    • Technology

    View All Topics

Home
  • Our Mission
  • Our Team
  • Latest Stories
  • Search
  • Upcoming Events
  • Contact Us
  • Newsletter
  • Donate
  • Work With Us
  • Fellowships

We’re an independent, nonprofit newsroom reporting on gender, politics and policy. Read our story.

Our reporters want to speak with you about what you are experiencing or witnessing in your community as abortion access becomes increasingly limited.

Get in touch with us.

The 19th News(letter)

News from reporters who represent you and your communities.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting...

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

Become a member

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

A capitol policeman surveils demonstrators.
Capitol police surveils a crowd of Abortion rights activists at a protest outside the Texas state capitol. (Photo by Sergio Flores/Getty Images)

Abortion

More than half of men favor Texas’ abortion ban, poll shows

Americans are split on Texas’ strict new abortion ban, with roughly equal numbers supporting and opposing it, but women far more likely to disapprove of the law.

Shefali Luthra

Health Reporter

Shefali Luthra portrait

Published

2021-10-05 05:01
5:01
October 5, 2021
am

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Americans are split on Texas’ strict new abortion ban, with roughly equal numbers supporting and opposing it, but women far more likely to disapprove of the law, per a new national poll first shared with The 19th and MSNBC. 

About 46 percent of adults support the Texas law, which bans abortions after six weeks of pregnancy and deputizes private citizens to enforce it through civil lawsuits. About the same amount — 47 percent of adults — oppose the law. The remaining 7 percent were undecided. 

Adults who oppose the law are more likely to say that they feel “strongly” about their position. Democrats and independents generally oppose the Texas law, while Republicans tend to support it.

The 19th thanks our sponsors. Become one.

The poll was conducted from September 22 through September 24 by the national survey organizations Lake Research and Emerson College Polling in partnership with All in Together, a group that advocates for civic engagement by women across political parties. It looked at 1,000 adults across the country and had a 3.1 percent margin of error.

The poll also identified a substantial gender gap. Most men expressed support for the law, with 53 percent in favor and 42 percent in opposition. Women, by contrast, generally opposed the law: 51 percent said they disapproved of the Texas abortion ban, and only 39 percent supported it. The poll included nonbinary respondents, but not enough to break out with confidence their views on the law.

The gap illuminates a larger trend in political alignment, argued Lauren Leader, the CEO of All in Together.

Stories by experienced reporters you can trust and relate to.

Delivered directly to your inbox every weekday.

You have been subscribed!

Submitting…

Uh-oh! Something went wrong. Please try again later.

“We talk a lot about political polarization, but there’s pretty significant gender polarization,” Leader said. “Women are more Democratic, more pro-choice and more progressive than men.”

Still, such a stark gender gap is relatively new to abortion politics, said Celinda Lake, the president of Lake Research and a longtime Democratic pollster. 

“When the law passed there was some difference in intensity, but there wasn’t the magnitude of gender gap you’re seeing now,” Lake said. “What you’re seeing is women who are directly affected — particularly younger women — are maintaining their intensity, whereas men have shifted away from feeling as intensely about it because they tend to be less personally affected.”

The Lake-Emerson poll is one of only a few to probe the national reaction to Texas’ law, which is the strictest active abortion restriction in the country and is inspiring copycat legislation in other Republican-led states. Because the pregnancy clock starts at four weeks — when someone has missed their menstrual period — it gives pregnant people no more than two weeks to realize they are pregnant, find the money, book an appointment and often travel for an abortion. As a result, the law has effectively ended abortion access for many Texans, and has resulted in many clinics ceasing to offer any kind of abortion services. 

This poll suggests a more polarized reaction to the six-week abortion ban. Other public opinion research — namely a poll by Monmouth from September 9 through 13 — had indicated much starker disapproval. 

In that poll, 54 percent of Americans said they opposed a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to let the law take effect. Key provisions of the law — in particular its reliance on private lawsuits and the $10,000 bounty — registered as especially unpopular, with about 8 in 10 saying they opposed such enforcement mechanisms. 

The difference, at least in part, likely comes down to how the polls worded their questions, Lake suggested. And some public outrage has likely waned over the past several weeks, because voters may be preoccupied with other concerns, such as the economy or the coronavirus pandemic. (The Monmouth poll was conducted sooner after the law had taken effect.) 

But both polls indicate that, when confronted with the details of the law, voters aren’t likely to support it.

“When you engage them in discussing the decision, and you give a sense of the provisions like ‘no exceptions for rape and incest,’ and the bounty hunter provision, then people are just really adamantly against it,” she said.

The Lake-Emerson poll suggests the abortion law — and increasing abortion restrictions more generally — could motivate Democrats and women in particular to vote in large numbers in the 2022 midterm elections. Currently, Republicans are more likely to indicate enthusiasm about voting in the next election. That’s fairly typical, since midterms usually favor the party out of power.

  • More from The 19th
    Cecile Richard is seen clapping and smiling.
  • ‘I need to be with other folks as outraged and motivated as I am’: Cecile Richards on why this year’s Women’s March matters
  • The 19th Explains: How 3 lawsuits could potentially stop the Texas abortion ban
  • In a personal turn, 3 lawmakers testify about their abortions

About 59 percent of people said they would be more likely to vote in the midterms because of the Texas law. The effect was greater for people who indicated they supported abortion access: 73 percent said they were more likely to vote next year because of the Texas law. Of people who said they oppose abortion rights, 60 percent said they were more likely to vote in the election.

Abortion rights could loom large in the midterms. Beyond the Texas law, the Supreme Court is slated to weigh in on a law from Mississippi, which would ban the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy. That law is currently not in effect and appears to contradict the federal abortion protections established by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade, which guaranteed the right to end a pregnancy up until a fetus can independently live outside the womb. 

The Court will hear arguments on the Mississippi law in December, and is expected to issue a ruling by June or July, only months before the election. 

If the Supreme Court — which has a conservative majority and is generally considered hostile to abortion rights — does uphold the Mississippi law in some form, the ruling would likely weaken or eliminate the protections established in Roe v. Wade, potentially relegating to individual states the power to ban abortions, if they choose. 

Such a ruling could also drive turnout among Democrats and people who support abortion rights, the poll suggested. About 55 percent of respondents said they would be more likely to vote if the court eliminates the Roe v. Wade protection. Democrats were more likely to say so than Republicans — 66 percent compared to 45 percent. About 69 percent of people who believe abortions should be legal and available said they would be more likely to vote if Roe v. Wade is overturned, compared to 51 percent of people who believe they should be banned. 

Roughly equal shares of men and women said they would be more likely to vote because of the Texas law, or because of a Supreme Court ruling erasing abortion rights. But intensity was greater for women voters — larger percentages said they would be “much more interested” in voting because of the Texas law in particular. Two-thirds of Democratic women said they would be more likely to vote if Roe v. Wade were to be overturned. 

Young women, young unmarried women and suburban women also appeared particularly moved by the issue, Lake said. If that energy is sustained, it could ameliorate the advantage Republicans have. 

“One of the groups we’re really having trouble with is younger voters, including younger women. This decision, plus the pattern [of abortion restrictions] could really affect turnout,” Lake said. “All groups of women could be motivated to vote based on this pattern of decisions and suburban women and independent women could be motivated to vote Democratic based on this.”

Our reporters want to speak with you about what you are experiencing or witnessing in your community as abortion access becomes increasingly limited.

Get in touch with us.

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Email

Help sustain what we started

Your monthly investment is critical to our sustainability as a nonprofit newsroom.

Donate Today

Become a member

Up Next

A protester waves her arm into the sky and closes her eyes while holding a large banner in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Abortion

106 restrictions on abortions have become law this year. It’s a record.

Texas, which effectively outlawed most abortions, was not even in the top five states in terms of the number of abortion restrictions enacted, an analysis found.

Read the Story

The 19th
The 19th is a 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organization. Our stories are free to republish in accordance with these guidelines.

  • Donate
  • Newsletter
  • Events
  • Search
  • Jobs
  • Fellowships
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Community Guidelines
  • Membership
  • Membership FAQ
  • Major Gifts
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Instagram